We define a Lie algebroid on the space of smooth 1-forms in the Nualart-Pardoux sense on the Wiener space associated to the stochastic linear Poisson structure on the Wiener space defined Léandre (2009).

1. Introduction

Infinite dimensional Poisson structures play a big role in the theory of infinite dimensional Lie algebras [1], in the theory of integrable system [2], and in field theory [3]. But for instance, in [2], the test functional space where the hydrodynamic Poisson structure acts continuously is not conveniently defined. In [4, 5] we have defined such a test functional space in the case of a linear Poisson bracket of hydrodynamic type. On the other hand, it is very well known [6] that the theories of Lie groupoids and Lie algebroids play a key role in Poisson geometry. It is interesting to study a Lie algebroid for the Poisson structure [4] defined analytically in the framework of [4]. We postpone until later the study the Lie groupoid associated to the same Poisson structure but in the algebraic framework of [5]. The definition of this Lie groupoid in the framework of [4] presents, namely, some difficulties. Moreover some deformation quantizations for symplectic structures in infinite dimensional analysis were recently performed (see the review of Léandre [7] on that). The theory of groupoids is related [8] to Kontsevich deformation quantization [9].

Let us recall what a Lie algebroid is [6, 10–13]. We consider a bundle E on a smooth finite dimensional manifold M. TM is the tangent bundle of M. Γ^∞(E) and Γ^∞(TM) denote the space of smooth section of E and TM. A Lie algebroid on E is given by the following data.

(i)
A Lie bracket structure [·, ·] _E on Γ^∞(E) has in particular to satisfy the Jacobi relation
()
(ii)
A smooth fiberwise linear map ρ_E, called the anchor map, from E into TM satisfies the relation
()
for any smooth sections X, Y of E and any element f of C^∞(M), the space of smooth functions on M.

Let us recall the definition of a Poisson structure on M. It is an antisymmetric ℝ-bilinear map {·, ·} from C^∞(M) × C^∞(M) into C^∞(M), which is a derivation on each components, vanishes on the constant and satisfies the Jacobi relation

()

A Poisson structure is given by a bivector π, that is, an element of Γ^∞(Λ²TM) as

()

where df₁ and df₂ can be seen as 1-forms and the dual of

is T_x(M). i_απ denotes the interior product of the bivector π by the 1-form α. If π is a bivector, then we can define a fiberwise linear smooth map from T^*M, the cotangent bundle of M, into TM, called

If α is a smooth section of T^*M, then

()

This allows us to define a Lie algebroid structure on T^*M [11, 14–18] as follows.

(i)
The Bracket is defined by
()
where L is the usual Lie derivative of a 1-form: if X is a vector field and α a k-form, then L_Xα is given by the Cartan formula
()
(ii)
The anchor map is the map .

Infinite dimensional symplectic structures and their related Poisson structure were introduced by Dito and Léandre [19], Léandre [7, 20–22], and Léandre and Obame [23] in the infinite dimensional analysis, motivated by the theory of deformation quantization in infinite dimension. We refer to the review of Léandre on that in [7].

The infinite dimensional Poisson structure is a tool in the theory of integrable system [24]. We refer to the review of Mokhov in [3] and Dubrovin and Novikov in [2] on that. In particular, some partial differential equations of the theory of integrable systems are described as Hamiltonian systems associated to some Poisson structure. For instance, the Gardner-Zakharov-Faddeev (ultralocal) bracket (see [2, pages 52-53])

()

is used to describe the KdV equation as a Hamiltonian system.

Another simple Poisson structure of Dubrovin and Novikov [2] is given as follows. We consider the set of smooth paths t → (x_i(t)) into (ℝ^m) ^*, the dual of a Lie algebra structure on ℝ^m with structural constants

. In such a case,

()

It is useful to avoid the presence of the Dirac mass, and Léandre [4] has given an appropriate definition of the Poisson structure of the previous formula in the framework of Malliavin Calculus.

The goal of infinite dimensional analysis is to give a rigorous meaning to some formal considerations of mathematical physics. The formal operations of mathematical physics are defined consistently on some functional spaces. It is very well known, for instance, that the vacuum expectation of some operator algebras [25] is given by formal path integrals on the fields. Infinite dimensional analysis deals in the simplest case where these objects are mathematically well established.

(i)
The functional integral side is given by the Malliavin Calculus [26].
(ii)
The operator algebra side is given by white noise analysis and quantum probability [27, 28].

Let us recall basically the objects of these Calculi.

(i)
The main object of white noise analysis and quantum probability is given by the Bosonic Fock space Fock(ℍ₂) associated to the Hilbert space ℍ₂ of L² maps from [0,1] into ℝ. Fock(ℍ₂) is constituted of series σ = ∑hⁿ where hⁿ belongs to , the symmetric n-tensor product of ℍ₂ such that
()
The operator algebra is the algebra of annihilation and creation operator on the Fock space submitted to the canonical commutation relations
()
where a(s) is an elementary annihilation operator. a^*(t) is an elementary creation operator. The presence of a Dirac mass leads to the same difficulties as in (1.8) and (1.9) and leads white noise analysis to consider an improvement of the Fock space (called the Hida Fock space) such that these operators act continuously on it. a(s) + a^*(s) is called the white noise and can be interpreted in the measure theory.
(ii)
The main object of the Malliavin Calculus is the L^p space of the Wiener measure.

If we consider the Brownian motion t → B(t) on ℝ (see part 2 of this work), then we can introduce the Brownian functional associated to σ in the Bosonic Fock space:

()

An element hⁿ of can be realized as a symmetric map from [0,1] ⁿ into ℝ and denotes a Wiener chaos [28]. This map ψ realizes an isometry between the Fock space and the L² of the Wiener measure. The main ingredient of the Malliavin Calculus is to take the derivative (almost surely defined!) in the direction of an element ; h ∈ ℍ₂. An element is called an element of the Cameron-Martin space ℍ. This operation can be interpreted as a “nonelementary” annihilation operator on the Fock space. Through this isomorphism, a(t) + a^*(t) can be interpreted as d/dtB(t), the white noise associated to the Brownian motion, which does not exist in the traditional sense because the Brownian motion is only continuous! Since there are integrations by parts associated to a derivativation along an element of the Cameron-Martin space of a cylindrical functional, this operation is closable. It is the generalization in infinite dimension of the traditional definition of Sobolev spaces on finite dimensional spaces. But in infinite dimension, we consider Gaussian measures and not Lebesgue measure, which does not exist as a measure in infinite dimension! But since there is no Sobolev imbedding in infinite dimension, functionals which belong to all the Sobolev spaces of the Malliavin Calculus (these functionals are said to be smooth in the Malliavin sense) are in general only almost surely defined!

The study of Poisson structures requests that the test functional space where this Poisson structure acts is an algebra.

(i)
In the case of the Malliavin Calculus, there is a natural way to choose an algebra starting from the considerations of measure theory. With the intersection of all the L^p, p < ∞ is indeed an algebra through the Hoelder inequality. We consider the Wiener product on the Wiener space which is the classical product of functionals.
(ii)
In white noise analysis, there is on the Fock space another product called the standard Wick product. The traditional product of a Wiener chaos of length n and of length m is not a chaos of length n + m by the help of the Itô formula. It is an infinite dimensional generalization of the fact that the product of two Hermite polynomials in finite dimension is not a Hermite polynomial. The classical Wick product consists to keep in the product of these two chaoses the chaoses of length n + m. Reference[29] has defined another Wick product (called the normalized Wick product), which fits well with Stratonovitch chaos. We consider now
()
We consider this time multiple Stratonovitch integrals. They are the limit when k → ∞ of the classical random multiple integrals where t → B^k(t) is the polygonal approximation of the Brownian motion. The Itô-Stratonovitch integral is the classical one. The normalized Wick product of Léandre and Rogers [29] :σ₁ · σ₂: of σ₁ and σ₂ belonging to the Hida Fock space is done in order
()
using the Itô-Stratonovitch formula [23]. This reflects in an infinite dimensional sense the classical fact that the product of two monomials is still a monomial in a finite dimensional polynomial algebra.

Léandre [4] has given an appropriate definition to the Poisson structure of the previous formula on an algebra of functional on the Wiener space of the Malliavin type. The main difficulty to overcome is that the good understanding of this Poisson structure leads to the study of some anticipative Stratonovitch integrals. The traditional Malliavin Calculus [26] is not suitable to study some anticipative Stratonovitch integrals. This means that if we consider a random element s → h(s) of ℍ₂ which belongs to all the Sobolev spaces of the Malliavin Calculus, then the anticipative Stratonovitch integral

()

does not exist. This pathology is not true if we consider a refinement of the Itô integral called the Hitsuda-Skorokhod integral [30]. Let us recall that the first authors who have studied anticipative Stratonovitch integrals are Nualart and Pardoux [30]. Léandre has defined conveniently some Sobolev spaces on the Wiener space such that the map anticipative Stratonovitch integral acts continuously on them [31–37]. Thisat means that if h ∈ ℍ₂ belongs to all the Sobolev spaces in the Nualart-Pardoux sense, then the anticipative Stratonovitch integral (1.15) exists. The main difference between the classical definition of the Sobolev space in the Malliavin sense and the Sobolev spaces in the Nualart-Pardoux sense is that some regularity on the kernels on the derivatives on the considered functionals is requested. This is a generalization of the following fact: we can define a nonanticipative Itô integral

without assuming a lot of regularity on the nonanticipative element h of ℍ₂. But in the case of a nonanticipative Stratonovitch integral,

, we have to assume that h is a semi-martingale; this means some regularity on h! The Sobolev spaces of Nualart-Pardoux type were introduced by Léandre in [31–36] in order to study some Sobolev cohomology theories of some loop space endowed with the Brownian bridge measure on a compact Riemannian manifold. So the Poisson structure (1.9) can be defined consistently on the Nualart-Pardoux test algebra [4].

Let us recall that in white noise analysis, the algebraic counterpart of the Malliavin Calculus, the main tool is the Fock space and the algebra of creation and annihilation operators on the Fock space. The Bosonic Fock space is transformed into the L² of an infinite dimensional Gaussian measure by the help of the map Wiener chaoses. The Poisson structure (1.9) was defined by Léandre in [5] on the Hida test algebra endowed with the normalized Wick product.

The goal of this paper is to define a Lie algebroid associated to the Poisson structure (1.9) on the Nualart-Pardoux test algebra. The main remark is that the map transforms a 1-form on the Wiener space smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense in a generalized vector field on the Wiener space, whose theory was done by Léandre in [32, 35], and not in an ordinary vector field on the Wiener space! Classical vector field on the Wiener space are random elements of the Cameron-Martin space which belongs to all the Sobolev spaces of the Malliavin Calculus. Generalized vectorfield is where h(s) is chosen well such that we can define the anticipative Stratonovitch integral . In general, we cannot define the derivative of a functional which belongs to all the Sobolev spaces of the Malliavin Calculus along a generalized vector field. But we can do that if the functional belongs to all the Sobolev spaces in the Nualart-Pardoux sense. In this paper, since we consider smooth 1-forms in the Nualart-Pardoux sense, we can define still their interior product by a generalized vector field through our theory of anticipative Stratonovitch integral. So the formulas (1.1) and (1.2) are still true, but almost surely!

2. The Linear Stochastic Poisson Structure

We consider the set of continuous paths C([0,1]; ℝ^m) from [0,1] into ℝ^m endowed with the uniform topology. A typical path is denoted by t → B(t) = (B_i(t)), on which we consider the Brownian motion measure dP [38].

Let us recall how we construct dP. We consider the Cameron-Martin Hilbert space ℍ [39] of maps from [0,1] into ℝ^m such that

()

and dP is formally the Gaussian probability measure

()

and dD is the formal Lebesgue measure on ℍ which does not exist as a measure (we refer to the works of Léandre [40–42], Asada [43], and Pickrell [44] for various approaches to the Lebesgue measure in infinite dimension). Let ℍ₁ be a finite dimensional real Hilbert space (h₁ ∈ ℍ₁) with Hilbert norm ∥·∥₁. Let us consider the centered normalized Gaussian measure on ℍ₁. It is classically represented by ∑e_iN_i where N_i are centered normalized independent one-dimensional Gaussian variables and the system of e_i constitutes an orthonormal basis of the real Hilbert space ℍ₁.

It should be tempting to represent dP by using the same procedure. We consider an orthonormal basis e_i of ℍ. The law of the Brownian motion is represented by the series ∑e_iN_i where the N_i is a collection of independent centered one-dimensional Gaussian variables. This series does not converge in ℍ but in C([0,1]; ℝ^m) [45]. We refer to the textbook of Kuo [46] for the theory of infinite dimensional Gaussian measures.

Let us consider a functional F on C([0,1]; ℝ^m). Its rth stochastic derivative ∇^rF, according to the framework of the Malliavin Calculus [26, 47, 48], is defined if it exists by

()

where h_i belongs to the Hilbert space of paths ℍ from [0,1] into ℝ^m satisfying

()

The Sobolev norms of the Malliavin Calculus are defined by the following formula. If F is a Brownian functional, then

()

The Malliavin test algebra consists of Brownian functionals F all of whose Sobolev norms ∥F∥_r,p are finite r, p < ∞. Let us recall how we construct these Sobolev spaces. Let f be a smooth function from (ℝ^m) ^d into ℝ with compact support and some times 0 < t₁ < ⋯<t_d ≤ 1. We introduce the cylindrical functional F(B(·)) = f(B(t₁), …, B(t_d)). We consider the Gateaux derivative of F along a deterministic direction h of ℍ:

()

There is absolutely no problem to define it. We use the integration by parts formula for a cylindrical functional

()

where δB(s) is the Itô differential. The Itô integral is the limit in all the L^p(dP), p < ∞ of the sum

where

is a dyadic subdivision of [0,1] of length 2ⁿ. The convergence does not pose any problem because h is deterministic. Since we have the integration by parts formula (2.7), we can extend the operation of taking the stochastic derivative of a Brownian functional F consistently, as we establish classically the definition of Sobolev spaces in finite dimension. The main novelty of the Malliavin Calculus with respects of [49–52] motivated by mathematical physics is that the algebra of functionals which belong to all the Sobolev spaces of the Malliavin Calculus (these functionals are said to be smooth in the Malliavin sense) is constituted of functionals almost surely defined. The reader interested in the Malliavin Calculus can see the books of [26, 47].

If we consider the same dyadic subdivision as before, we can introduce the polygonal approximation Bⁿ(t) of B(t). Let us consider a “nondeterministic!” map from [0,1] into ℝ^mt → β_t which belongs to L²([0,1]; ℝ^m). We can consider the random ordinary integral . It can also be easily defined. In general, the limit may not exist when n tends to infinity, because the Brownian motion is only continuous. If we can pass to the limit, we say that the limit is an anticipative Stratonovitch integral. Nualart and Pardoux [30] are the first authors who have defined some anticipative Stratonovitch integrals. An appropriate theory was established by Léandre [31–36] in order to understand some Sobolev cohomology theories on the loop space. Let us recall it quickly.

We consider another set of Sobolev norms [31]. We suppose that outside the diagonals of [0,1] ^r

()

The smallest C_r,p such that the previous inequality is satisfied is called the first Nualart-Pardoux Sobolev norm. The second Nualart-Pardoux Sobolev norm is the smallest

such that, for all (s_i)∈[0,1] ^r,

()

Definition 2.1. The Nualart-Pardoux test algebra N.P_∞− consists of functionals F whose all Nualart-Pardoux Sobolev norms of first type and second type are finite. The elements of N.P_∞− are said to be smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense.

Let us recall that N.P_∞− is an algebra [31].

We can consider a random element of L²([0,1]; ℝ^m), t → β_t. We can consider its rth stochastic derivative

()

Its first Nualart-Pardoux Sobolev norm C_r,p is the smallest number such that outside the diagonals of [0,1]×[0,1] ^r

()

The second type of Nualart-Pardoux Sobolev norm

of β_(·) is the smallest number such that for all (t, s₁, …, s_r)∈[0,1]×[0,1] ^r

()

Let us recall the theorem of Léandre [31].

Theorem 2.2. Let β be a random element of L²([0,1]; ℝ^m) such that all its Nualart-Pardoux Sobolev norms are finite. Then the anticipative Stratonovitch integral

()

is smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense and its Nualart-Pardoux Sobolev norms can be estimated in terms of the Nualart-Pardoux norms of β.

In such a case,

is the limit in all the L^p(dP), p < ∞ of

. Moreover,

()

This means that the kernel of the stochastic derivative of

. Let us explain this formula; in order to take the stochastic derivative of

, we do the same formal computations as if the anticipative Stratonovitch integral had been a classical integral; we take first of all derivatives of β_t which lead to the term

and derivatives of dB_t which lead to

Let us recall the notion of a Poisson bracket {·, ·}. We consider a commutative Frechet unital real algebra endowed with a family of Banach norms ∥·∥_p. This means that for all p, there exists p¹ such that for all F¹, F² in A

()

A Poisson Bracket is a bilinear map from A × A into A, which is a derivation in each argument, vanishes on the unit. The derivation property means that for all F¹, F², F³ in A

()

Moreover, it satisfies the following properties: if F¹, F², F³ belong to A, then

()

Moreover, for all p, there exist p^′ and C_p such that

()

In the sequel, we will choose A = N.P_∞−. We consider the structural constants

of a Lie algebra structure on (ℝ^m) ^*. The stochastic gradient ∇F of a functional F can be written ∇F = (∇F_i). Formula (1.9) reads in this framework as

()

where we consider a Stratonovitch anticipative integral. This defines a Poisson structure on N.P_∞− in our framework [4, Theorem 1].

Remark 2.3. Let us motivate (2.19). Let us consider the Hilbert space ℍ₂ of L² maps from [0,1] into ℝ^m. The define a structure of Lie algebra on ℝ^m*, and therefore, on ℍ₂. Let us consider two functionals F¹ and F² Frechet smooth on . Their derivatives are given by kernels

()

The Lie bracket [∇F¹, ∇F²] is given by [∇F¹(s), ∇F²(s)] and the classical Lie-Poisson structure is given by

()

These considerations are heuristic because the product of two elements of L² is not an element of L². If we replace dB(s) by h(s)ds and if we consider the white-noise measure on ℍ₂

instead of the Brownian measure (2.2), then this heuristic formula gives the formula (2.19). This is relevant of the so-called Malliavin transfer principle: a formula becomes almost surely true through the theory of Stratonovitch integrals.

3. The Stochastic Lie Algebroid

Smooth vector fields in the Nualart-Pardoux sense on the Wiener space are functions β_t from [0,1] into ℝ^m such that

()

on the connected complements of [0,1]×[0,1] ^r where we have removed the diagonals and such that

()

The infimums of C_r,p and of

in the previous formula are called the Nualart-Pardoux Sobolev norms of the vector field β_(·).

Smooth 1-forms in the Nualart-Pardoux sense on the Wiener space are functions α_(·) from [0,1] into ℝ^m* such that

()

on the connected complements of [0,1]×[0,1] ^r where we have removed the diagonals and such that

()

The infimums of C_r,p and of

in the previous formula are called the Sobolev norms of the 1-form α_(·). The pairing between a 1-form α_(·) and a vector field β_(·) is realized via the formula

()

If α¹, α² are two smooth 1-forms in the Nualart-Pardoux sense on the Wiener space, then the bivector π associated to the stochastic Poisson structure is given by

()

The stochastic bivector π realizes a continuous bilinear map on the space of smooth 1-forms smooth into the space of smooth functionals.

A generalized vector field according to our theory [32, 35] is a a random application from [0,1] into ℝ^m

of the form

()

where β_(i,j,.) and β_(·) are smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense. The Nualart-Pardoux Sobolev norms of a generalized vector field

are the collection of Nualart-Pardoux norms of β_(i,j,.) and β_(·).

We can define a pairing between smooth 1-form and generalized vector fields by using the formula

()

This allows us to define

for a smooth 1-form in the Nualart-Pardoux sense as the generalized vector field

()

This allows us to put the following definition.

Definition 3.1. If α and β are smooth 1-forms in the Nualart-Pardoux sense, then we define

()

where the Lie derivative is defined as usual by the formula

()

and d is the exterior derivative.

Since

is a generalized vector field, the introduction of the Lie derivative leads to stochastic integral (we refer to [32, 33, 35] for similar constructions). Let us recall some results of [31, 32]. Let

be a map from [0,1]×[0,1] into ℝ^m* or later into (ℝ^m*) ^⊗2 such that

()

on the connected complements of [0,1]×[0,1]×[0,1] ^r where we have removed the diagonals and such that

()

The infimums of C_r,p and of

in the previous formula are called the Nualart-Pardoux Sobolev norms of the α_(·). In such case

is still smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense, with t₁ being included as well as

This allows us to show the following theorem.

Theorem 3.2. [·, ·] is a continuous antisymmetric bilinear application acting on the space of smooth 1-forms in the Nualart-Pardoux sense with values in the set of smooth 1-forms in the Nualart-Pardoux sense.

Proof of Theorem 3.2. We remark that

()

which is smooth and its Sobolev norms can be estimated in terms of the Sobolev norms of αⁱ by Theorem 2.2.

Moreover,

()

which is still smooth. Moreover,

()

Moreover,

()

which is smooth by the remark preceding the theorem.

Theorem 3.3. [·, ·] defines a Lie bracket.

Let 0 < t₁ < ⋯<t_r = 1 be a dyadic subdivision of [0,1]. We deduce a partition of [0,1] ^r in cubes I_n,r of volume V_n. If β is a function from [0,1] ^r into some linear space, then we put

()

If we consider the polygonal approximation Bⁿ of B and F_n being the σ-algebra associated to Bⁿ, We denote by Π_n the operation of taking the conditional expectation of a functional f by F_n. The results of Léandre [31, Appendix], allow to state the proposition.

Proposition 3.4. Let one have

()

If α(t₁) with values in ℝ^m* is smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense, t₁ being included, then the random ordinary integral

tends in all the Sobolev spaces of the Malliavin Calculus to the anticipative Stratonovitch integral

. If α(t₁, t₂) which takes its values in (ℝ^m*) ^⊗2 is smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense, then the double random ordinary integral

tends in all the Sobolev spaces of the Malliavin Calculus to the double anticipative Stratonovitch integral

Proof of Theorem 3.3. Let us consider the finite dimensional Gaussian space . A 1-form is piecewise constant as well as a vector field h_t. If Fⁿ is a functional which depends on Bⁿ only, then ∇^rFⁿ is constant on each I_n,r. We put

()

This defines a Poisson structure on the finite dimensional Gaussian space.

We can define πⁿ, [·, ·] _n, and according to the line of the introduction. To a 1-form smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense α on the total Wiener space, we consider the 1-form Πⁿχ_nα = αⁿ on the finite dimensional Gaussian space. We get

()

by doing as in finite dimension. By the previous proposition [[α^1,n, α^2,n] _n, α^3,n] _n tends in all this attained L^p to [[α¹, α²], α³]. Therefore the result.

Let us give the scheme of the proof of this last result. When we write [[α^1,n, α^2,n] _n, α^3,n] _n, there are a lot of terms which will appear. All these terms will tends separately to the corresponding term in [[α¹, α²], α³]. Let us treat one of them, which will lead to double anticipative Stratonovitch integral. The other terms will be treated identically. For instance will lead to double Stratonovitch integral which will tend in all the Sobolev spaces of the Malliavin Calculus to . We can consider in these expressions the term which will lead to a double stochastic integral and which will tend to . But there are two parts in and . We will consider the parts and where we take the covariant derivative of the 1-form α² in the direction of the generalized vector field . We will show that tends to . But in these expressions there are still two parts which can be treated similarly. We will show that the expression tends to (we consider the covariant derivative of α^3,n in the direction of ).

But

()

Therefore

()

This implies that

()

where

( we consider a 1-form in the t variable).

Therefore

()

By Proposition 3.4, this tends in all the Sobolev spaces of the Malliavin Calculus to

()

We recognize in this quantity

where we take the covariant derivative of α³ in the direction of the generalized vector field

(we had taken the covariant derivative of α² in the direction of the generalized vector field

Theorem 3.5. is an anchor map. This means that for all 1-form α, β which are smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense all functional F are smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense; one has the relation:

()

Proof of Theorem 3.5. We get by classical results in finite dimension

()

By the results of Proposition 3.4, this tends when n → ∞ to the formula

()

Therefore the result is attained.

4. Conclusion

We can summarize that realizes a stochastic Lie algebroid acting on the space of smooth 1-forms in the Nualart-Pardoux sense on the Wiener space and functional smooth in the Nualart-Pardoux sense on the Wiener space. takes its values in the space of generalized vector fields.

References

1 Kirillov A. A., Local Lie algebras, Russian Mathematical Surveys. (1976) 31, no. 4, 55–75, ZBL0357.58003.
10.1070/RM1976v031n04ABEH001556
Google Scholar
2 Dubrovin B. A. and Novikov S. P., Hydrodynamics of weakly deformed soliton lattices. Differential geometry and Hamiltonian theory, Russian Mathematical Surveys. (1989) 44, no. 6, 35–124, https://doi.org/10.1070/RM1989v044n06ABEH002300, MR1037010, ZBL0712.58032.
10.1070/RM1989v044n06ABEH002300
Web of Science® Google Scholar
3 Mokhov O. I., Differential geometry of symplectic and Poisson structures on loop spaces of smooth manifolds, and integrable systems, Loop Spaces and Groups of Diffeomorphisms, 1997, 217, Nauka, Moscow, Russia, 91–125, Proceedings of the Steklov Institute of Mathematics.
Google Scholar
4 Léandre R., A stochastic Poisson structure, Symmetry, 2009, 1, 55–63.
Google Scholar
5 Léandre R., M. Schlichenmaier and Th. Voronov, A Poisson structure in white-noise analysis, XXVIII Workshop of Geometrical Method in Physics, 2009, Bialowiesza, Poland.
Google Scholar
6 Weinstein A., Poisson geometry, Differential Geometry and Its Applications. (1998) 9, no. 1-2, 213–238, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-2245(98)00022-9, MR1636305, ZBL0930.37032.
10.1016/S0926-2245(98)00022-9
Web of Science® Google Scholar
7 Léandre R., M. Scheutzow, P. Morters, and J. Blath, Deformation quantization in infinite dimensional analysis, Trends in Stochastic Analysis (Festchrift in honour of H. v. Weizsaecker), 2009, 353, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, 303–325, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, MR2562159, ZBL1172.53056.
10.1017/CBO9781139107020.014
Google Scholar
8 Cattaneo A. S., Dherin B., and Felder G., Formal symplectic groupoid, Communications in Mathematical Physics. (2005) 253, no. 3, 645–674, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-004-1199-z, MR2116732, ZBL1072.58008.
10.1007/s00220-004-1199-z
Web of Science® Google Scholar
9 Kontsevich M., Deformation quantization of Poisson manifolds, Letters in Mathematical Physics. (2003) 66, no. 3, 157–216, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:MATH.0000027508.00421.bf, MR2062626, ZBL1058.53065.
10.1023/B:MATH.0000027508.00421.bf
Web of Science® Google Scholar
10 Cannas da Silva A. and Weinstein A., Geometric Models for Noncommutative Algebras, 1999, 10, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA, Berkeley Mathematics Lecture Notes, MR1747916.
Google Scholar
11 Kosmann-Schwarzbach Y., M. Eastwood and A. Rod-Gover, Poisson manifolds, Lie algebroids, modular classes: a survey, SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry. Methods and Applications. (2008) 4, paper 005, 30, https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2008.005, MR2369386, ZBL1147.53067.
10.3842/SIGMA.2008.005
Google Scholar
12 Mackenzie K., Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids in Differential Geometry, 1987, 124, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, MR896907.
10.1017/CBO9780511661839
Google Scholar
13 Mackenzie K. C. H., General Theory of Lie Groupoids and Lie Algebroids, 2005, 213, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, MR2157566.
10.1017/CBO9781107325883
Google Scholar
14 Coste A., Dazord P., and Weinstein A., Groupoïdes symplectiques, Publications du Département de Mathématiques, 1987, 87, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France, 1–62, MR996653, ZBL0668.58017.
Google Scholar
15 Fuchssteiner B., The Lie algebra structure of degenerate Hamiltonian and bi-Hamiltonian systems, Progress of Theoretical Physics. (1982) 68, no. 4, 1082–1104, https://doi.org/10.1143/PTP.68.1082, MR688120, ZBL1098.37540.
10.1143/PTP.68.1082
Google Scholar
16 Gelfand I. M. and Dorfman I. Ya., Schouten bracket and Hamiltonian operators, Functional Analysis and Its Applications. (1980) 14, no. 3, 71–74, MR583806.
10.1007/BF01078432
Web of Science® Google Scholar
17 Karasev M. V., Analogues of objects of Lie groups for nonlinear Poisson brackets, Mathematics of the USSR-Izvestiya. (1987) 28, 497–527.
10.1070/IM1987v028n03ABEH000895
Google Scholar
18 Magri F. and Morosi C., A geometrical characterization of integrable Hamiltonian systems through the theory of Poisson-Nijenhuis manifolds, Quaderno. (1984) 19.
Google Scholar
19 Dito G. and Léandre R., Stochastic Moyal product on the Wiener space, Journal of Mathematical Physics. (2007) 48, no. 2, 8, 023509, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2472184, MR2297976, ZBL1121.81089.
10.1063/1.2472184
Web of Science® Google Scholar
20 Léandre R., Deformation quantization in white noise analysis, SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry. Methods and Applications. (2007) 3, paper 027, 8, https://doi.org/10.3842/SIGMA.2007.027, MR2299828, ZBL1143.53082.
10.3842/SIGMA.2007.027
Google Scholar
21 Léandre R., Fedosov quantization in white noise analysis, Journal of Nonlinear Mathematical Physics. (2008) 15, no. supplement 3, 251–263, https://doi.org/10.2991/jnmp.2008.15.s3.25, MR2452437.
10.2991/jnmp.2008.15.s3.25
Web of Science® Google Scholar
22 Léandre R., Hochschild cohomology theories in white noise analysis, SIGMA. Symmetry, Integrability and Geometry. Methods and Applications. (2008) 4, paper 066, 13, MR2470530, ZBL1162.53328.
Google Scholar
23 Léandre R. and Obame B., Quantization of the Connes algebra, in preparation.
Google Scholar
24 Odzijewicz A. and Ratiu T. S., Banach Lie-Poisson spaces and reduction, Communications in Mathematical Physics. (2003) 243, no. 1, 1–54, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00220-003-0948-8, MR2020219, ZBL1044.53057.
10.1007/s00220-003-0948-8
Web of Science® Google Scholar
25 Di Francesco P., Mathieu P., and Sénéchal D., Conformal Field Theory, 1996, Springer, Heidelberg, Germany.
Google Scholar
26 Nualart D., The Malliavin Calculus and Related Topics, 1995, Springer, New York, NY, USA, Probability and Its Applications, MR1344217.
10.1007/978-1-4757-2437-0
Google Scholar
27 Hida T., Kuo H.-H., Potthoff J., and Streit L., White Noise: An Infinite-Dimensional Calculu, 1993, 253, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, Mathematics and Its Applications, MR1244577.
10.1007/978-94-017-3680-0
Google Scholar
28 Meyer P.-A., Quantum Probability for Probabilists, 1995, 1610, Springer, Berlin, Germany, Lecture Notes in Mathematics.
10.1007/BFb0084701
Google Scholar
29 Léandre R. and Rogers A., Equivariant cohomology, Fock space and loop groups, Journal of Physics A. (2006) 39, no. 38, 11929–11946, https://doi.org/10.1088/0305-4470/39/38/018, MR2275894, ZBL1100.58015.
10.1088/0305-4470/39/38/018
Google Scholar
30 Nualart D. and Pardoux É., Stochastic calculus with anticipating integrands, Probability Theory and Related Fields. (1988) 78, no. 4, 535–581, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00353876, MR950346, ZBL0629.60061.
10.1007/BF00353876
Web of Science® Google Scholar
31 Léandre R., J. Azéma, M. Emery, and M. Yor, Cohomologie de Bismut-Nualart-Pardoux et cohomologie de Hochschild entière, Séminaire de Probabilités, XXX, 1996, 1626, Springer, Berlin, Germany, 68–99, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, MR1459477, https://doi.org/10.1007/BFb0094642, ZBL0870.58011.
10.1007/BFb0094642
Google Scholar
32 Léandre R., K. D. Elworthy, S. Kusuoka, and I. Shigekawa, Brownian cohomology of an homogeneous manifold, New Trends in Stochastic Analysis (Charingworth, 1994), 1997, World Scientific, River Edge, NJ, USA, 305–347, MR1654376.
Google Scholar
33 Léandre R., A. Hora, Stochastic cohomology and Hochschild cohomology, Development of Infinite-Dimensional Noncommutative Analysis, Kyoto, Japan 1998, 1999, 1099, University Press, Kyoto, Kyoto, Japan, 17–26, RIMS Kokyuroku.
Google Scholar
34 Léandre R., Cover of the Brownian bridge and stochastic symplectic action, Reviews in Mathematical Physics. (2000) 12, no. 1, 91–137, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X00000058, MR1750777, ZBL0968.58027.
10.1142/S0129055X00000058
Web of Science® Google Scholar
35 Léandre R., Stochastic Adams theorem for a general compact manifold, Reviews in Mathematical Physics. (2001) 13, no. 9, 1095–1133, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129055X01000909, MR1853827, ZBL1037.58025.
10.1142/S0129055X01000909
Web of Science® Google Scholar
36 Léandre R., Stochastic algebraic de Rham complexes, Acta Applicandae Mathematicae. (2003) 79, no. 3, 217–247, https://doi.org/10.1023/B:ACAP.0000003885.89851.c0, MR2019477, ZBL1039.58031.
10.1023/B:ACAP.0000003885.89851.c0
Web of Science® Google Scholar
37 Léandre R. and Volovich I. A., The stochastic Lévy Laplacian and Yang-Mills equation on manifolds, Infinite Dimensional Analysis, Quantum Probability and Related Topics. (2001) 4, no. 2, 161–172, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219025701000449, MR1841615, ZBL1049.58037.
10.1142/S0219025701000449
Web of Science® Google Scholar
38 Lévy P., Processus Stochastiques et Mouvement Brownien, 1992, 3rd edition, Gauthier-Villars, Paris, France.
Google Scholar
39 Cameron R. H. and Martin W. T., Transformations of Wiener integrals under translations, Annals of Mathematics. (1944) 45, 386–396, MR0010346, ZBL0063.00696.
10.2307/1969276
Google Scholar
40 Léandre R., J. P. Françoise, G. L. Naber, and T. S. Tsun, Paths integrals in noncommutative geometry, Encyclopedia of Mathematical Physics, 2006, Elsevier, Oxford, UK, 8–12.
10.1016/B0-12-512666-2/00478-8
Google Scholar
41 Léandre R., G. Adenier, C. Fuchs, and A. Khrennikov, Infinite Lebesgue distribution on a current group as an invariant distribution, Foundations of Probability and Physics IV, Vaxjoe, Sweden, 2006, 2007, 889, American Institute of Physics, Melville, NY, USA, 332–335, AIP Conference Proceedings, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.2713476.
10.1063/1.2713476
Google Scholar
42 Léandre R., The Lebesgue measure in infinite-dimensional spaces as an infinite-dimensional distribution, Fundamental′naya i Prikladnaya Matematika. (2007) 13, no. 8, 127–132, translation in Journal of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 159, no. 6, pp. 833–836, 2009https://doi.org/10.1007/s10958-009-9475-2, MR2475586.
10.1007/s10958?009?9475?2
Google Scholar
43 Asada A., Regularized calculus: an application of zeta regularization to infinite dimensional geometry and analysis, International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics. (2004) 1, no. 1-2, 107–157, https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219887804000071, MR2055292, ZBL1078.58019.
10.1142/S0219887804000071
Web of Science® Google Scholar
44 Pickrell D., Invariant measures for unitary groups associated to Kac-Moody Lie algebras, Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society. (2000) 146, no. 693, MR1686655, ZBL0960.43001.
10.1090/memo/0693
Web of Science® Google Scholar
45 Neveu J., Processus Aléatoires Gaussiens, 1968, Les Presses de l'Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada, Séminaire de Mathématiques Supérieures, no. 34, MR0272042.
Google Scholar
46 Kuo H. H., Gaussian Measures in Banach Spaces, 1975, Springer, Berlin, Germany, Lecture Notes in Mathematics, vol. 463, MR0461643.
10.1007/BFb0082007
Google Scholar
47 Ikeda N. and Watanabe S., Stochastic Differential Equations and Diffusion Processes, 1989, 24, 2nd edition, North-Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, North-Holland Mathematical Library, MR1011252.
Google Scholar
48 Malliavin P., K. Itô, Stochastic calculus of variation and hypoelliptic operators, 1978, Proceedings of the International Symposium on Stochastic Differential Equations (Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 1976), 1978, New York, NY, USA, John Wiley & Sons, 195–263, MR536013, ZBL0411.60060.
Google Scholar
49 Albeverio S. and Høegh-Krohn R., Dirichlet forms and diffusion processes on rigged Hilbert spaces, Zeitschrift für Wahrscheinlichkeitstheorie und Verwandte. (1977) 40, no. 1, 1–57, MR0455133, ZBL0342.60057.
10.1007/BF00535706
Web of Science® Google Scholar
50 Berezanskii Y., The self adjointness of elliptic operators with an infinite number of variables, Ukrainian Mathematical Journal. (1975) 27, 729–742.
Google Scholar
51 Gross L., Potential theory on Hilbert space, Journal of Functional Analysis. (1967) 1, 123–181, MR0227747, ZBL0165.16403.
10.1016/0022-1236(67)90030-4
Google Scholar
52 Hida T., Analysis of Brownian Functionals, 1975, Carleton University, Ottawa, Canada, Carleton Mathematical Lecture Notes, no. 1, MR0451429.
Google Scholar
53 Léandre R., Long time behaviour of the Wiener process on a path group, to appear in Group Theory: Classes, Representations and Connections, and Applications.
Google Scholar

All articles

A Lie Algebroid on the Wiener Space

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. The Linear Stochastic Poisson Structure

3. The Stochastic Lie Algebroid

4. Conclusion

References

References

Information

About Wiley Online Library

Help & Support

Opportunities

Connect with Wiley

A Lie Algebroid on the Wiener Space

Abstract

1. Introduction

2. The Linear Stochastic Poisson Structure

3. The Stochastic Lie Algebroid

4. Conclusion

References

References

Related

Information