Volume 20, Issue 4-5 159347 pp. 251-257
Article
Open Access

Quasimonomorphic Mononucleotide Repeats for High-Level Microsatellite Instability Analysis

Asad Umar

Asad Umar

INSERM U434 CEPH Paris, France , inserm.fr

Search for more papers by this author
Olivier Buhard

Olivier Buhard

INSERM U434 CEPH Paris, France , inserm.fr

Search for more papers by this author
Nirosha Suraweera

Nirosha Suraweera

INSERM U434 CEPH Paris, France , inserm.fr

Search for more papers by this author
Aude Lectard

Aude Lectard

INSERM U434 CEPH Paris, France , inserm.fr

Search for more papers by this author
Alex Duval

Alex Duval

INSERM U434 CEPH Paris, France , inserm.fr

Search for more papers by this author
Richard Hamelin

Corresponding Author

Richard Hamelin

INSERM U434 CEPH Paris, France , inserm.fr

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 21 May 2013
Citations: 123

Abstract

Microsatellite instability (MSI) analysis is becoming more and more important to detect sporadic primary tumors of the MSI phenotype as well as in helping to determine Hereditary Non-Polyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) cases. After some years of conflicting data due to the absence of consensus markers for the MSI phenotype, a meeting held in Bethesda to clarify the situation proposed a set of 5 microsatellites (2 mononucleotide repeats and 3 dinucleotide repeats) to determine MSI tumors. A second Bethesda consensus meeting was held at the end of 2002. It was discussed here that the 1998 microsatellite panel could underestimate high-level MSI tumors and overestimate low-level MSI tumors. Amongst the suggested changes was the exclusive use of mononucleotide repeats in place of dinucleotide repeats. We have already proposed a pentaplex MSI screening test comprising 5 quasimonomorphic mononucleotide repeats. This article compares the advantages of mono or dinucleotide repeats in determining microsatellite instability.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.