Volume 118, Issue 2 pp. 160-163
Short Report

Medication use in Canadian blood donors

Mindy Goldman

Corresponding Author

Mindy Goldman

Medical Affairs and Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Canada

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Correspondence

Mindy Goldman, Canadian Blood Services, Donation Policy & Studies, 1800 Alta Vista Drive, Ottawa, ON K1G 4J5, Canada.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Owen Miller

Owen Miller

Medical Affairs and Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
Sheila F. O'Brien

Sheila F. O'Brien

Medical Affairs and Innovation, Canadian Blood Services, Ottawa, Canada

School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 December 2022

Funding information: The authors received no specific funding for this work.

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Policies regarding medication use vary between blood centres. We evaluated medication use in eligible Canadian Blood Services whole blood donors to inform possible process improvements and allow comparisons between donors and the general population.

Materials and Methods

All donors are asked about medication use in the last 3 days, and medications and their reason for use are documented in our donor computer system. Donor computer records were reviewed from January 1, 2020, to March 31, 2022 to extract information on medications by donor age and sex; medications were grouped into therapeutic classes. Stability of medication use over time was determined in a random sample of 100 donors who made at least two donations in the study period.

Results

One-third of successful (eligible) donors were taking medications; of these, 80% were on one or two medications. Five classes of medication accounted for 72% of medication use, and 13 classes account for 93% of use. Use remains relatively stable over time.

Conclusion

Medication use is common, with a few classes accounting for most use. Drop-down lists and storage of information from one donation to the next may enhance efficiency.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.