Volume 59, Issue 6 pp. 1916-1920
CASE REPORT

Prevention of hemolytic transfusion reactions with intravenous immunoglobulin prophylaxis in U– patients with anti-U

Nay Win

Corresponding Author

Nay Win

Red Cell Immunohaematology, NHS Blood and Transplant (Tooting Centre), London, UK

Address reprint requests to: Dr Nay Win, NHSBT—Tooting, 75 Cranmer Terrace, London, SW17 0RB, UK; e-mail: [email protected].Search for more papers by this author
Muhsin Almusawy

Muhsin Almusawy

Department of Haematology, Bedford Hospital NHS Trust, Bedford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Loraine Fitzgerald

Loraine Fitzgerald

Department of Haematology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Guy Hannah

Guy Hannah

Department of Haematology, Brighton and Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trust, Brighton, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Tom Bullock

Tom Bullock

Red Cell Immunohaematology, NHS Blood and Transplant (Filton Centre), Bristol, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 12 March 2019
Citations: 8

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The U– phenotype is extremely rare and is found predominantly in black African populations at a frequency of between 0.2 and 1.7%. In European populations, U– units are therefore rare, with limited availability in the United Kingdom. Anti-U is clinically significant and is known to cause hemolytic transfusion reactions (HTRs) and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. It has been suggested that intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) may be considered as an option among supportive therapy for urgent transfusion when clinically significant antigen-matched units are not available. We report three cases with anti-U transfused with least-incompatible RBC units, their outcomes, and their clinical management.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Intravenous immunoglobulin was prescribed when least-incompatible units must be issued in patients with anti-U to ameliorate acute HTR and prevent the development of delayed HTR. We report the outcome of these cases.

RESULTS

Of the case reports described, one patient with weak anti-U developed a delayed HTR after transfusion with incompatible units due to an anamnestic response. Two additional patients are described, with the use of IVIG as a precautionary measure to prevent the development of HTRs when transfused with antigen-positive incompatible units. No acute HTRs or delayed HTRs were noted upon follow-up.

CONCLUSION

U– units are not always readily available and transfusion support requires close collaborative working among a multidisciplinary team. Transfusion with antigen-positive incompatible units with IVIG cover both ameliorates acute HTRs and prevents the development of delayed HTRs.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.