Volume 24, Issue 6 e13973
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Serologic evaluation of vaccine preventable infections and vaccination rates in kidney transplant candidates

Sabrina Schneider

Sabrina Schneider

Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Kansas Health, Kansas City, Kansas, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Adrian Carlson

Adrian Carlson

Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Department of Pharmacy Services, Medical University of South Carolina, Lancaster Division, South Carolina, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Bhanupriya Sirandas

Bhanupriya Sirandas

Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Breanna Clark

Breanna Clark

Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Department of Pharmacy Services, Saint Luke's Hospital of Kansas City, Kansas City, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Crystal Truax

Corresponding Author

Crystal Truax

Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

Correspondence

Crystal Truax, Department of Pharmacy Services, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 October 2022
Citations: 3

Abstract

Introduction

Assessing vaccine serologic status presents opportunities to provide live vaccinations to kidney transplant candidates (KTC). This is especially important given the increased risk of infection while taking lifelong immunosuppression following transplant and the inability to routinely provide live vaccines to patients on immunosuppressive medications. In March 2019, the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Disease Community of Practice (AST-IDCOP) released updated guidelines for vaccination of KTC, which emphasize pretransplant viral serology screening and live vaccine administration prior to transplant.

Primary Endpoint

The primary endpoint of this study was to determine adherence to AST-IDCOP guidelines for live measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR) and VZV vaccination prior to transplant in KTC non-immune by serology.

Methods

This retrospective, descriptive study examined serologic status and rates of live vaccination in 672 patients listed for kidney transplant at our center between July 2014 and July 2019. Secondary endpoints included subgroup analysis of adherence to full AST-IDCOP vaccination recommendations and validation of CDC presumed immunity definitions for measles and VZV.

Results

Seventeen patients (2.7%) were nonimmune by serology for VZV, while 182 (27.1%) were nonimmune by serology to MMR. In a subgroup analysis of the seronegative KTC, none received VZV vaccination, and 6% received MMR vaccination prior to transplant or last follow-up.

Conclusions

Overall, a large portion of KTC had immunity gaps that were not resolved before transplantation. These findings are limited due to the retrospective, single-center nature of this study and should be confirmed with larger, prospective assessments of serologic status and vaccine administration.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors of this manuscript declare no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.