Insights from the Breast Cancer Screening Trials: How Screening Affects the Natural History of Breast Cancer and Implications for Evaluating Service Screening Programs
Corresponding Author
László Tabár MD
Department of Mammography, Central Hospital, Falun, Sweden
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Laszlo Tabar, Falun Center Hospital - Radiology/Mammography, Falun 79182, Sweden, or e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAmy Ming-Fang Yen PhD
School of Oral Hygiene, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorWendy Yi-Ying Wu PhD
Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorSam Li-Sheng Chen PhD
School of Oral Hygiene, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorSherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu PhD
Department and Graduate Institute of Health Care Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorJean Ching-Yuan Fann PhD
Department of Health Industry Management, College of Healthcare Management, Kainan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorMay Mei-Sheng Ku PhD
Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorStephen W Duffy MSc
Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorTony Hsiu-Hsi Chen PhD
Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
László Tabár MD
Department of Mammography, Central Hospital, Falun, Sweden
Address correspondence and reprint requests to: Laszlo Tabar, Falun Center Hospital - Radiology/Mammography, Falun 79182, Sweden, or e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorAmy Ming-Fang Yen PhD
School of Oral Hygiene, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorWendy Yi-Ying Wu PhD
Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorSam Li-Sheng Chen PhD
School of Oral Hygiene, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorSherry Yueh-Hsia Chiu PhD
Department and Graduate Institute of Health Care Management, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorJean Ching-Yuan Fann PhD
Department of Health Industry Management, College of Healthcare Management, Kainan University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorMay Mei-Sheng Ku PhD
Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorStephen W Duffy MSc
Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
Search for more papers by this authorTony Hsiu-Hsi Chen PhD
Graduate Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, College of Public Health, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
It is desirable to have a strategy for evaluation of breast cancer service screening programs years before the long-term breast cancer mortality data are available. Since successful mammography screening has a significant impact on two components of the TNM (tumor size, node status, presence or absence of distant metastases) classification system, tumor size and node status, we investigated the effect of the randomized breast screening trials on incidence of advanced stage disease and on the subsequent breast cancer death rate. In the trials that achieved a 20% or greater reduction in advanced stage disease, there was an average breast cancer mortality reduction of 28% among women invited to screening (attenders and nonattenders combined). In the trials that achieved a reduction in advanced stage disease of less than 10%, there was no reduction in breast cancer mortality among women invited to screening. This study provides evidence that the average mortality reduction in all the trials underestimates the true mortality reduction, and that substantially greater breast cancer mortality reductions can be expected in screening programs that are effective in reducing advanced stage breast cancer. In addition, monitoring the incidence of advanced stage breast cancer in an ongoing screening program can provide a sensitive and early indicator of the subsequent mortality from the disease.
References
- 1 Organizing Committee and Collaborators. Breast cancer screening with mammography in women aged 40-49 years. Report of the organizing committee and collaborators, Falun meeting, Falun, Sweden (21and 22 March, 1996). Int J Cancer 1996; 68: 693–9.
- 2Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 2004; 42: 793–806, v.
- 3Tabar L, Fagerberg CJ, Gad A, et al. Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985; 1: 829–32.
- 4Tabar L, Fagerberg G, Duffy SW, Day NE, Gad A, Grontoft O. Update of the Swedish two-county program of mammographic screening for breast cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 1992; 30: 187–210.
- 5Tabar L, Duffy SW, Vitak B, Chen HH, Prevost TC. The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening? Cancer 1999; 86: 449–62.
10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19990801)86:3<449::AID-CNCR13>3.0.CO;2-Q CAS PubMed Web of Science® Google Scholar
- 6 NHS Breast Screening Programme. Annual Review 2012. Sheffield: NHS Cancer Screening Programmes, 2012.
- 7Spiegelhalter DJ, Abrams KR, Myles JP. Bayesian Approaches to Clinical Trials and Health Care Evaluation. Chichester: Wiley, 2004.
10.1002/0470092602 Google Scholar
- 8Thompson SG, Higgins JP. How should meta-regression analyses be undertaken and interpreted? Stat Med 2002; 21: 1559–73.
- 9Freedman LS, Graubard BI, Schatzkin A. Statistical validation of intermediate endpoints for chronic diseases. Stat Med 1992; 11: 167–78.
- 10Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R. Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982; 69: 349–55.
- 11Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, et al. 14 years of follow-up from the Edinburgh randomised trial of breast- cancer screening [see comments]. Lancet 1999; 353: 1903–8.
- 12Andersson I, Aspegren K, Janzon L, et al. Mammographic screening and mortality from breast cancer: the Malmo mammographic screening trial. BMJ 1988; 297: 943–8.
- 13Andersson I, Janzon L. Reduced breast cancer mortality in women under age 50: updated results from the Malmo Mammographic Screening Program. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 1997; 22: 63–7.
- 14Bjurstam N, Bjorneld L, Warwick J, et al. The Gothenburg Breast Screening Trial. Cancer 2003; 97: 2387–96.
- 15Frisell J, Lidbrink E, Hellstrom L, Rutqvist LE. Followup after 11 years–update of mortality results in the Stockholm mammographic screening trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat 1997; 45: 263–70.
- 16Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 2. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 50 to 59 years [published erratum appears in Can Med Assoc J 1993 Mar 1;148(5):718] [see comments]. CMAJ 1992; 147: 1477–88.
- 17Miller AB, Baines CJ, To T, Wall C. Canadian National Breast Screening Study: 1. Breast cancer detection and death rates among women aged 40 to 49 years [published erratum appears in Can Med Assoc J 1993 Mar 1;148(5):718] [see comments]. CMAJ 1992; 147: 1459–76.
- 18Miller AB, Wall C, Baines CJ, Sun P, To T, Narod SA. Twenty five year follow-up for breast cancer incidence and mortality of the Canadian National Breast Screening Study: randomised screening trial. BMJ 2014; 348: g366.
- 19Moss S, Waller M, Anderson TJ, Cuckle H. Randomised controlled trial of mammographic screening in women from age 40: predicted mortality based on surrogate outcome measures. Br J Cancer 2005; 92: 955–60.
- 20Moss SM, Cuckle H, Evans A, Johns L, Waller M, Bobrow L. Effect of mammographic screening from age 40 years on breast cancer mortality at 10 years’ follow-up: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2006; 368: 2053–60.
- 21Duffy SW, Yen AM, Chen TH, et al. Long-term benefits of breast screening. Breast Cancer Management 2012; 1: 31–8.
- 22Gotzsche PC, Jorgensen KJ. Screening for breast cancer with mammography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2013; 6: CD001877.
- 23 Independent UK Panel on Breast Cancer Screening. The benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: an independent review. Lancet 2012; 380: 1778–86.
- 24Morrison AS. Intermediate determinants of mortality in the evaluation of screening. Int J Epidemiol 1991; 20: 642–50.
- 25Elkin EB, Hudis C, Begg CB, Schrag D. The effect of changes in tumor size on breast carcinoma survival in the U.S.: 1975-1999. Cancer 2005; 104: 1149–57.
- 26Autier P, Hery C, Haukka J, Boniol M, Byrnes G. Advanced breast cancer and breast cancer mortality in randomized controlled trials on mammography screening. J Clin Oncol 2009; 27: 5919–23.
- 27 Swedish Organized Service Screening Evaluation Group. Effect of mammographic service screening on stage at presentation of breast cancers in Sweden. Cancer 2007; 109: 2205–12.
- 28Autier P, Boniol M, Middleton R, et al. Advanced breast cancer incidence following population-based mammographic screening. Ann Oncol 2011; 22: 1726–35.
- 29Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast cancer incidence. N Engl J Med 2012; 367: 1998–2005.
- 30Kopans DB. Point: The New England Journal of Medicine article suggesting overdiagnosis from mammography screening is scientifically incorrect and should be withdrawn. J Am Coll Radiol 2013; 10: 317–9; discussion 323.
- 31Nederend J, Duijm LE, Voogd AC, Groenewoud JH, Jansen FH, Louwman MW. Trends in incidence and detection of advanced breast cancer at biennial screening mammography in The Netherlands: a population based study. Breast Cancer Res 2012; 14: R10.
- 32Anttila A, Sarkeala T, Hakulinen T, Heinavaara S. Impacts of the Finnish service screening programme on breast cancer rates. BMC Public Health 2008; 8: 38.
- 33Barchielli A, Paci E. Trends in breast cancer mortality, incidence, and survival, and mammographic screening in Tuscany, Italy. Cancer Causes Control 2001; 12: 249–55.
- 34Foca F, Mancini S, Bucchi L, et al. Decreasing incidence of late-stage breast cancer after the introduction of organized mammography screening in Italy. Cancer 2013; 119: 2022–8.
- 35Fracheboud J, Otto SJ, van Dijck JA, et al. Decreased rates of advanced breast cancer due to mammography screening in The Netherlands. Br J Cancer 2004; 91: 861–7.
- 36Hofvind S, Sorum R, Thoresen S. Incidence and tumor characteristics of breast cancer diagnosed before and after implementation of a population-based screening-program. Acta Oncol 2008; 47: 225–31.
- 37Schouten LJ, de Rijke JM, Huveneers JA, Verbeek AL. Rising incidence of breast cancer after completion of the first prevalent round of the breast cancer screening programme. J Med Screen 2002; 9: 120–4.
- 38Broeders M, Moss S, Nystrom L, et al. The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies. J Med Screen 2012; 19(Suppl 1): 14–25.
- 39Gabe R, Duffy SW. Evaluation of service screening mammography in practice: the impact on breast cancer mortality. Ann Oncol 2005; 16(Suppl 2): ii153–62.
- 40Harris R, Yeatts J, Kinsinger L. Breast cancer screening for women ages 50 to 69 years a systematic review of observational evidence. Prev Med 2011; 53: 108–14.
- 41Irvin VL, Kaplan RM. Screening mammography & breast cancer mortality: meta-analysis of quasi-experimental studies. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e98105.
- 42Nickson C, Mason KE, English DR, Kavanagh AM. Mammographic screening and breast cancer mortality: a case-control study and meta-analysis. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2012; 21: 1479–88.
- 432Paap E, Verbeek A, Puliti D, Broeders M, Paci E. Minor influence of self-selection bias on the effectiveness of breast cancer screening in case-control studies in the Netherlands. J Med Screen 2011; 18: 142–6.
- 44Schopper D, de Wolf C. How effective are breast cancer screening programmes by mammography? Review of the current evidence. Eur J Cancer 2009; 45: 1916–23.
- 45Walter SD. Mammographic screening: case-control studies. Ann Oncol 2003; 14: 1190–2.
- 46Welch HG. Screening mammography–a long run for a short slide? N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1276–8.
- 47Aerts L, Christiaens MR, Enzlin P, Neven P, Amant F. Sexual functioning in women after mastectomy versus breast conserving therapy for early-stage breast cancer: a prospective controlled study. Breast 2014; 23: 629–36.
- 48Collins KK, Liu Y, Schootman M, et al. Effects of breast cancer surgery and surgical side effects on body image over time. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2011; 126: 167–76.
- 49Crosbie J, Kilbreath SL, Dylke E, et al. Effects of mastectomy on shoulder and spinal kinematics during bilateral upper-limb movement. Phys Ther 2010; 90: 679–92.
- 50Gho SA, Steele JR, Jones SC, Munro BJ. Self-reported side effects of breast cancer treatment: a cross-sectional study of incidence, associations, and the influence of exercise. Cancer Causes Control 2013; 24: 517–28.
- 51Hayes SC, Johansson K, Stout NL, et al. Upper-body morbidity after breast cancer: incidence and evidence for evaluation, prevention, and management within a prospective surveillance model of care. Cancer 2012; 118: 2237–49.
- 52Schmitz KH, Speck RM, Rye SA, DiSipio T, Hayes SC. Prevalence of breast cancer treatment sequelae over 6 years of follow-up: the Pulling Through Study. Cancer 2012; 118: 2217–25.
- 53Ewertz M, Jensen AB. Late effects of breast cancer treatment and potentials for rehabilitation. Acta Oncol 2011; 50: 187–93.
- 54Kaplan HG, Malmgren JA, Atwood MK. Increased incidence of myelodysplastic syndrome and acute myeloid leukemia following breast cancer treatment with radiation alone or combined with chemotherapy: a registry cohort analysis 1990-2005. BMC Cancer 2011; 11: 260.
- 55Smith AK, Conneely KN, Pace TW, et al. Epigenetic changes associated with inflammation in breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy. Brain Behav Immun 2014; 38: 227–36.
- 56Hughes KS, Schnaper LA, Bellon JR, et al. Lumpectomy plus tamoxifen with or without irradiation in women age 70 years or older with early breast cancer: long-term follow-up of CALGB 9343. J Clin Oncol 2013; 31: 2382–7.
- 57Silverstein MJ, Waisman JR, Gierson ED, Colburn W, Gamagami P, Lewinsky BS. Radiation therapy for intraductal carcinoma. Is it an equal alternative? Arch Surg 1991; 126: 424–8.
- 58Tabar L, Lindhe N, Yen AM, et al. Radiotherapy after surgery for small breast cancers of stellate appearance. In: L Tabar, ed. Imaging of the Breast-Technical Aspects and Clinical Implication. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech, 2012: 217–24.
10.5772/1230 Google Scholar