Volume 24, Issue 3 pp. 351-358
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The revised EEMCO guidance for the in vivo measurement of water in the skin

Enzo Berardesca

Enzo Berardesca

San Gallicano Dermatological Institute, Rome, Italy

Search for more papers by this author
Marie Loden

Marie Loden

Eviderm Institute, Solna, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Jorgen Serup

Jorgen Serup

Department of Dermatology, Bispebjerg University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Philippe Masson

Philippe Masson

Bordeaux, France

Search for more papers by this author
Luis Monteiro Rodrigues

Corresponding Author

Luis Monteiro Rodrigues

CBIOS (University Lusofona's Research Center for Biosciences and HealthTecnologies), Lisboa, Portugal

Pharmacology Sciences Department, School of Pharmacy, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal

Correspondence

Luis Monteiro Rodrigues, CBIOS – U Lusofona, Health Sciences & Technology School, Lisboa, Portugal.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 20 June 2018
Citations: 124

Abstract

Background

Noninvasive quantification of stratum corneum water content is widely used in skin research and topical product development.

Methods

The original EEMCO guidelines on measurements of skin hydration by electrical methods and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) by evaporimeter published in 1997 and 2001 have been revisited and updated with the incorporation of recently available technologies.

Results

Electrical methods and open-chamber evaporimeters for measurement of TEWL are still the preferred techniques to measure the water balance in the stratum corneum. The background technology and biophysics of these instruments remain relevant and valid. However, new methods that can image surface hydration and measure depth profiles of dermal water content now available. Open-chamber measurement of TEWL has been supplemented with semiopen and closed chamber probes, which are more robust to environmental influence and therefore convenient to use and more applicable to field studies. However, closed chamber methods interfere with the evaporation of water, and the methods cannot be used for continuous monitoring. Validation of methods with respect to intra- and inter-instrument variation remains challenging. No validation standard or test phantom is available.

Results and Conclusions

The established methods for measurement of epidermal water content and TEWL have been supplemented with important new technologies including methods that allow imaging of epidermal water distribution and water depth profiles. A much more complete and sophisticated characterization of the various aspects of the dermal water barrier has been accomplished by means of today's noninvasive techniques; however, instrument standardization and validation remain a challenge.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.