ORIGINAL ARTICLE
The evolution of mandated coordination in policy implementation: Evidence from China's central government agencies
Liang Ma,
Bin Chen,
Tom Christensen,
Weixing Liu,
Liang Ma
School of Government Management, Peking University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Bin Chen
The Austin W. Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, Baruch College & The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, United States
Correspondence
Bin Chen, The Austin W. Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, Baruch College & The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorTom Christensen
Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Search for more papers by this authorWeixing Liu
School of Government, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorLiang Ma,
Bin Chen,
Tom Christensen,
Weixing Liu,
Liang Ma
School of Government Management, Peking University, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Bin Chen
The Austin W. Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, Baruch College & The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, United States
Correspondence
Bin Chen, The Austin W. Marxe School of Public and International Affairs, Baruch College & The Graduate Center, The City University of New York, New York, USA.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorTom Christensen
Department of Political Science, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Search for more papers by this authorWeixing Liu
School of Government, University of International Business and Economics, Beijing, China
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
enPolicies are often mandated to be implemented by multiple agencies, and it is meaningful to explore the mechanisms and dynamics of interagency coordination. By employing structurally oriented theory from organization theory to analyze archival data, this study examines the structure and dynamics of mandated interagency coordination arrangements in China's central agencies (2005–2022). Given their intricacies, economic and social policies are the priorities of mandated coordination. The results show a dense and unbalanced coordination, in which powerful agencies dominate coordination. The results reveal that coordination across agencies has steadily increased over time despite intensive institutional mergers and consolidation.
摘要
zh政策往往需要多个部门共同执行，并且探究部门间协调的机制和动态一事具有意义。本研究运用组织理论中的结构导向理论来分析档案数据，进而研究了2005-2022年间中国中央部门间协调安排的结构和动态。由于经济政策和社会政策的复杂性，它们成为协调的重点。研究结果显示，协调密集但不均衡，其中强势部门主导协调。结果显示，尽管存在密集的机构合并和整合，但跨部门协调会随时间推移而稳步增加。
Resumen
esLas políticas suelen ser de aplicación obligatoria por parte de múltiples agencias, y es importante explorar los mecanismos y la dinámica de la coordinación interinstitucional. Mediante el empleo de la teoría de orientación estructural de la teoría organizacional para analizar datos de archivo, este estudio examina la estructura y la dinámica de los acuerdos de coordinación interinstitucional obligatorios en las agencias centrales de China (2005-2022). Dadas sus complejidades, las políticas económicas y sociales son las prioridades de la coordinación obligatoria. Los resultados muestran una coordinación densa y desequilibrada, en la que las agencias poderosas dominan la coordinación. Los resultados revelan que la coordinación entre agencias ha aumentado de manera constante con el tiempo a pesar de las intensas fusiones y consolidaciones institucionales.
Supporting Information
| Filename | Description |
|---|---|
| ropr70003-sup-0001-AppendixS1.docxWord 2007 document , 66 KB |
Appendix S1. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
- Baekkeskov, E., & Rubin, O. (2017). Information dilemmas and blame-avoidance strategies: From secrecy to lightning rods in Chinese health crises. Governance, 30(3), 425–443. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12244
- Bardach, E. (1998). Getting agencies to work together: The practice and theory of managerial craftsmanship. Brookings Institution.
- F. R. Baumgartner, C. Breunig, & E. Grossman (Eds.). (2019). Comparative policy agendas: Theory, tools, data. Oxford University Press.
10.1093/oso/9780198835332.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Borgatti, S. P., & Everett, M. G. (2000). Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks, 21(4), 375–395. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2
- Borgatti, S. P., Everett, M. G., & Freeman, L. C. (2002). Ucinet for windows: Software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Inc.
- Bouckaert, G., Peters, B. G., & Verhoest, K. (2010). The coordination of public sector organizations: Shifting patterns of public management. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Bovens, M. (2007). Analysing and assessing accountability: A conceptual framework. European Law Journal, 13(4), 447–468. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x
- Brown, T. L., Gong, T., & Jing, Y. (2012). Collaborative Governance in Mainland China and Hong Kong: Introductory Essay. International Public Management Journal, 15(4), 393–404. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2012.761048
- Chen, S., Christensen, T., & Ma, L. (2019). Competing for father's love? The politics of central government agency termination in China. Governance, 32(4), 761–777. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12405
- Choi, S. O., & Brower, R. S. (2006). When practice matters more than government plans: A network analysis of local emergency management. Administration and Society, 37(6), 651–678. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399705282879
- Christensen, T., Dong, L., & Painter, M. (2008). Administrative reform in China's central government—how much ‘learning from the West’? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 74(3), 351–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852308095308
- Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2007). The whole-of-government approach to public sector reform. Public Administration Review, 67(6), 1059–1066. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00797.x
- Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2008). The Challenge of coordination in central government organizations: The Norwegian case. Public Organization Review, 8(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-008-0058-3
10.1007/s11115?008?0058?3 Google Scholar
- Christensen, T., & Lægreid, P. (2010). Increased complexity in public organizations — The challenges of combining NPM and post-NPM. In P. Lægreid & K. Verhoest (Eds.), Governance of Public Sector Organizations: Proliferation, Autonomy and Performance (pp. 255–275). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
10.1057/9780230290600_13 Google Scholar
- Christensen, T., & Ma, L. (2020). Coordination structures and mechanisms for crisis management in China: Challenges of complexity. Public Organization Review, 20(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-018-0423-9
- Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., Roness, P. G., & Røvik, K. A. (2007). Organization theory and the public sector: instrument, culture and myth. Ashgate.
10.4324/9780203929216 Google Scholar
- Christensen, T., Lægreid, P., & Rykkja, L. H. (2015). The challenges of coordination in national security management—The case of the terrorist attack in Norway. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(2), 352–372. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314564307
- Dong, L., Christensen, T., & Painter, M. (2010). A case study of China's administrative reform: The importation of the super-department. The American Review of Public Administration, 40(2), 170–188. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074009334075
- Egeberg, M. (2012). How bureaucratic structure Matters: An organizational perspective. In B. G. Peters & J. Pierre (Eds.), The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration (pp. 157–168). Sage Publications.
10.4135/9781446200506.n10 Google Scholar
- Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015). Collaborative Governance Regimes. Georgetown University Press.
- Gao, J. (2010). Hitting the target but missing the point: The rise of non-mission-based targets in performance measurement of Chinese local governments. Administration and Society, 42(1 suppl), 56S–76S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399710361854
10.1177/0095399710361854 Google Scholar
- Gormley, W. T., & Balla, S. J. (2013). Bureaucracy and democracy: Accountability and performance ( 3rd ed.). CQ Press.
- Gregory, R. (2003). All the kings's horses and all the king's men: Putting New Zealand's public sector back together again. International Public Management Review, 4(2), 41–58.
- Gulick, L. H. (1937). Notes on the theory of organization. In L. H. Gulick & L. F. Urwick (Eds.), Papers on the science of administration (p. l46). Institute of Public Administration.
- Hall, T. E., & O'Toole, L. J., Jr. (2000). Structures for policy implementation: an analysis of national legislation, 1965–1966 and 1993–1994. Administration and Society, 31(6), 667–686. https://doi.org/10.1177/00953990022019281
- Hall, T. E., & O'Toole, L. J., Jr. (2004). Shaping formal networks through the regulatory process. Administration and Society, 36(2), 186–207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704263476
- Head, B. W., & Alford, J. (2015). Wicked problems: Implications for public policy and management. Administration and Society, 47(6), 711–739. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399713481601
- Hood, C. (2005). The idea of joined-up Government: A historical perspective. In V. Bogdanor (Ed.), Joined-Up Government (pp. 19–42). Oxford University Press.
10.5871/bacad/9780197263334.003.0002 Google Scholar
- Huang, C., Su, J., Xie, X., Ye, X., Li, Z., Porter, A., & Li, J. (2014). A Bibliometric Study of China's Science and Technology Policies: 1949–2010. Scientometrics, 102(2), 1521–1539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-014-1406-4
10.1007/s11192?014?1406?4 Google Scholar
- Hustedt, T., & Danken, T. (2017). Institutional logics in inter-departmental coordination: Why actors agree on a joint policy output. Public Administration, 95(3), 730–743. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12331
- Isett, K. R., & Provan, K. G. (2005). The evolution of dyadic interorganizational relationships in a network of publicly funded nonprofit agencies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15(1), 149–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mui008
- James, O., & Nakamura, A. (2015). Shared performance targets for the horizontal coordination of public organizations: Control theory and departmentalism in the United Kingdom's public service agreement system. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(2), 392–411. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852314565998
- Kahn, M. E., & Zheng, S. (2016). Blue skies over Beijing: Economic growth and the environment in China. Princeton University Press.
- Kapucu, N., & Demiroz, F. (2011). Measuring performance for collaborative public management using network analysis methods and tools. Public Performance & Management Review, 34(4), 549–579. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576340406
- Koop, C., & Lodge, M. (2014). Exploring the co-ordination of economic regulation. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(9), 1311–1329. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.923023
- Lægreid, P., Randma-Liiv, T., Rykkja, L. H., & Sarapuu, K. (2015). Emerging coordination practices of European central governments. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 81(2), 346–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852315579398
- Li, B., Tang, S. Y., Wang, F., & Yin, H. (2024). Policy implementation through performance measurement: A study of water pollution remediation in China's Huai River Basin. Review of Policy Research, 41(1), 210–238. https://doi.org/10.1111/ropr.12496
- Li, W., & Chan, H. S. (2009). Clean air in urban China: The case of inter-agency coordination in Chongqing's blue sky program. Public Administration and Development, 29(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.501
- Liang, J., & Langbein, L. (2015). Performance management, high-powered incentives, and environmental policies in China. International Public Management Journal, 18(3), 346–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2015.1043167
- Lieberthal, K. (2004). Governing China: From revolution through reform ( 2nd ed.). W. W. Norton.
- Liu, P., & McGuire, W. (2014). One regulatory state, two regulatory regimes: Understanding dual regimes in China's regulatory state building through food safety. Journal of Contemporary China, 24(91), 119–136. https://doi.org/10.1080/10670564.2014.918411
10.1080/10670564.2014.918411 Google Scholar
- Liu, S., & Christensen, T. (2020). All roads lead to Rome? The contingency factors of institutional integration. A comparative case study on environmental institutional reform in Guangdong, China. International Public Management Journal, 23(3), 338–357. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2019.1663327
- Lundin, M. (2007). Explaining cooperation: How resource interdependence, goal congruence, and trust affect joint actions in policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(4), 651–672. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mul025
- Ma, L. (2016). Performance feedback, government goal-setting, and aspiration level adaptation: Evidence from Chinese Provinces. Public Administration, 94(2), 452–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12225
- Ma, L., & Christensen, T. (2018). Mapping the evolution of the central government apparatus in China. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(1), 80–97. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852317749025
10.1177/0020852317749025 Google Scholar
- Ma, L., & Christensen, T. (2019). Same bed, different dreams? Structural factors and leadership characteristics of central government agency reform in China. International Public Management Journal, 22(4), 643–663. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2018.1450311
10.1080/10967494.2018.1450311 Google Scholar
- Montinola, G., Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. (1995). Federalism, Chinese style: The political basis for economic success in China. World Politics, 48(1), 50–81.
- Newig, J., & Koontz, T. M. (2014). Multi-level governance, policy implementation and participation: The EU's mandated participatory planning approach to implementing environmental policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 21(2), 248–267. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2013.834070
- O'Toole, L. J., Jr., & Montjoy, R. S. (1984). Interorganizational policy implementation: A theoretical perspective. Public Administration Review, 44(6), 491–503.
- Patashnik, E. M. (2008). Reforms at risk: what happens after major policy changes are enacted. Princeton University Press.
- Peters, B. G. (2006). Concepts and theories of hoizontal policy management. In J. Pierre & B. G. Peters (Eds.), Handbook of public policy. Sage Publications.
10.4135/9781848608054.n7 Google Scholar
- Peters, B. G. (2015). State failure, governance failure and policy failure: Exploring the linkages. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3–4), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0952076715581540
- Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2017). Public management reform: A comparative analysis—into the age of austerity ( 4th ed.). Oxford University Press.
- Putansu, S. R. (2015). Cross agency priority goals in the U.S. government: Can directed collaboration be a stepping stone toward politic-centered performance? Policy and Society, 34(1), 25–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2015.03.003
- Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01405730
- Roberts, M., & Milman, A. (2024). The relationship between how agencies work together and coordinated outcomes: A configurational analysis. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 34(2), 255–269. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muad026
- Rodriguez, C., Langley, A., Beland, F., & Denis, J.-L. (2007). Governance, power, and mandated collaboration in an interorganizational network. Administration and Society, 39(2), 150–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399706297212
- Schafer, J. G. (2016). Mandates to coordinate: The case of the Southern Nevada public lands management act. Public Performance & Management Review, 40(1), 23–47. https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2016.1177555
- Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198295457.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Schattschneider, E. E. (1960). The semi-sovereign people: A realist's view of democracy in America. The Dryden Press.
- Schillemans, T. (2010). Redundant accountability: The joint impact of horizontal and vertical accountability on autonomous agencies. Public Administration Quarterly, 34(3), 300–337.
- Scott, R., & Boyd, R. (2017). Interagency performance targets: A case study of New Zealand's Results Programme.
- Simon, H. A. (1957). Administrative behavior. Free Press.
- Verhoest, K., Bouckaert, G., & Peters, B. G. (2007). Janus-faced reorganization: Specialization and coordination in four OECD countries in the period 1980 2005. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 73(3), 325–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852307081144
- Wallace, J. L. (2016). Juking the stats? Authoritarian information problems in China. British Journal of Political Science, 46(1), 11–29.
- Wang, H., & Ran, B. (2023). Network governance and collaborative governance: A thematic analysis on their similarities, differences, and entanglements. Public Management Review, 25(6), 1187–1211. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2021.2011389
- Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
- Yi, H., Liu, W., & Li, F. (2021). Network structure and low-carbon governance performance: A qualitative comparative analysis. International Public Management Journal, 24(1), 23–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10967494.2020.1851330
- Zhou, L., & Dai, Y. (2021). Within the shadow of hierarchy: The role of hierarchical interventions in environmental collaborative governance. Governance, 36(1), 187–208. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12664
