Volume 22, Issue 3 pp. e36-e62
REGULAR ARTICLE

Export performance of developing countries: Does landlockedness matter?

Ramesh C. Paudel

Corresponding Author

Ramesh C. Paudel

Arndt–Corden Department of Economics, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, 2601 Canberra, ACT, Australia

CorrespondenceRamesh C. Paudel, Arndt-Corden Department of Economics, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, 2601, Canberra, ACT, Australia

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Arusha Cooray

Arusha Cooray

Arndt–Corden Department of Economics, Crawford School of Public Policy, Australian National University, 2601 Canberra, ACT, Australia

Business School, University of Nottingham, Malaysia

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 April 2018
Citations: 10

Abstract

Landlockedness imposes additional costs on trade and reduces international competitiveness. This paper examines the determinants of export performance in developing countries, within a comparative perspective of landlocked developing countries (LLDCs) and non-landlocked developing countries, by using a standard gravity modeling framework. The study covers data from 1995 to 2015. The results suggest that despite recent trade policy reforms, the overall export performance of LLDCs is lower than that of non-landlocked developing countries due to the inherent additional trade costs associated with landlockedness. The conventional wisdom that export performance is aided by economic openness also applies to LLDCs, but distance-related trade costs have a greater negative impact on exports from LLDCs than on other developing countries. The immediate trade policy challenge for LLDCs is therefore to create a more trade-friendly environment by lowering tariffs, reforming exchange rates and entering into regional trade agreements.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.