Time in hand: Temporal focus in risk discourse and audience emotions on knowledge-sharing platforms
Jiuchang Wei
School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, P. R. China
State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, P. R. China
Search for more papers by this authorYiming Lu
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, P. R. China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yi-Na Li
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, P. R. China
Correspondence
Yi-Na Li, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, P. R. China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorJiuchang Wei
School of Public Affairs, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, P. R. China
State Key Laboratory of Fire Science, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, P. R. China
Search for more papers by this authorYiming Lu
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, P. R. China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yi-Na Li
School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, P. R. China
Correspondence
Yi-Na Li, School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, P. R. China.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Online knowledge-sharing platforms construct risk knowledge and provide the audience with risk-related scientific facts. We study how speakers organize narratives in past, present, and future foci to influence the audience's emotions through the audience's appraisal of motive congruency and coping potential. Empirical evidence from 210 Technology, Entertainment, Design talks about disasters from 2002 to 2018 demonstrates that emphasizing the past, present, and future in risk narrative leads to the audience's comments with more negative, less positive, and more positive emotions, respectively. Concrete (vs. abstract) portrayal of the risk narrative improves the audience's situational awareness, enhances their risk appraisal, and intensifies the impact of temporal focus on emotions, providing evidence of how temporal focus impacts. These findings demonstrate that temporal focus can effectively reduce risk overreaction or ignorance and facilitate emotion regulation in risk communication.
REFERENCES
- Adamopoulos, P., Ghose, A., & Todri, V. (2018). The impact of user personality traits on word of mouth: Text-mining social media platforms. Information Systems Research, 29(3), 612–640.
- Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. (2001). Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, 26(4), 512–529.
- Bachura, E., Valecha, R., Chen, R., & Rao, H. R. (2022). The OPM data breach: An investigation of shared emotional reactions on twitter. MIS Quarterly, 46(2), 881–910.
10.25300/MISQ/2022/15596 Google Scholar
- Beck, U. (1992). The risk society: Toward a new modernity. Sage.
- Beck, U. (2002). The terrorist threat: World risk society revisited. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(4), 39–55.
- Beck, U. (2009). World at risk. Polity.
- Bluedorn, A. C., & Denhardt, R. B. (1988). Time and organizations. Journal of Management, 14(2), 299–320.
- Bluedorn, A. C. (2002). The human organization of time: Temporal realities and experience. Stanford University Press.
- Boholm, M. (2018). Risk association: Towards a linguistically informed framework for analysing risk in discourse. Journal of Risk Research, 21(4), 480–501.
10.1080/13669877.2016.1223158 Google Scholar
- Bowonder, B., & Kasperson, J. X. (2022). Hazards in developing countries: Cause for global concern. In J. X. Kasperson & R. E. Kasperson (Eds.), The social contours of risk (pp. 167–171). Earthscan.
10.4324/9781849772556-13 Google Scholar
- Burns, A. J., Roberts, T. L., Posey, C., & Lowry, P. B. (2019). The adaptive roles of positive and negative emotions in organizational insiders’ security-based precaution taking. Information Systems Research, 30(4), 1228–1247.
- Carleton, R. N. (2016). Into the unknown: A review and synthesis of contemporary models involving uncertainty. Journal of Anxiety Disorders, 39, 30–43.
- Caruso, E. M. (2010). When the future feels worse than the past: a temporal inconsistency in moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139(4), 610.
- Chen, J., & Nadkarni, S. (2017). It's about time! CEOs' temporal dispositions, temporal leadership, and corporate entrepreneurship. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(1), 31–66.
- Cinelli, C., Ferwerda, J., & Hazlett, C. (2020). sensemakr: Sensitivity analysis tools for OLS in R and Stata. Available at SSRN 3588978.
- Davies, S. R. (2008). Constructing communication: Talking to scientists about talking to the public. Science Communication, 29(4), 413–434.
- Diener, E., Kanazawa, S., Suh, E. M., & Oishi, S. (2015). Why people are in a generally good mood. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(3), 235–256.
- Drake, L., Duncan, E., Sutherland, F., Abernethy, C., & Henry, C. (2008). Time perspective and correlates of wellbeing. Time & Society, 17(1), 47–61.
- Endsley, M. R. (1995). Toward a theory of situation awareness in dynamic systems. Human Factors, 37(1), 32–64.
- Endsley, M. R., Bolté, B., & Jones, D. G. (2003). Designing for situation awareness: An approach to user-centered design. Taylor & Francis.
10.1201/9780203485088 Google Scholar
- Escalas, J. E. (2007). Self-referencing and persuasion: Narrative transportation versus analytical elaboration. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 421–429.
- FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). n.d. Natural hazards. FEMA. https://hazards.fema.gov/nri/natural-hazards
- Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. (Editedby Colin Gordon.) Brighton, U.K: Harvester Press.
- Foucault, M. (2003). Society Must Be Defended: Lectures at the College De France, 1975–76. New York: Picador, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2006.
- Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of economic literature, 40(2), 351–401.
- Fried, Y., & Slowik, L. H. (2004). Enriching goal-setting theory with time: An integrated approach. Academy of Management Review, 29(3), 404–422.
- Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge University Press.
- Frings, D., Wills, J., Sykes, S., Wood, K. V., & Albery, I. P. (2023). Multiple group membership, optimistic bias, and infection risk in the context of emerging infectious diseases. European Journal of Health Psychology, 30(3), 115–125.
10.1027/2512-8442/a000127 Google Scholar
- Gamache, D. L., & McNamara, G. (2019). Responding to bad press: How CEO temporal focus influences the sensitivity to negative media coverage of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal, 62(3), 918–943.
- George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2000). The role of time in theory and theory building. Journal of Management, 26(4), 657–684.
- Giddens, A. (1998). The third way: The renewal of social democracy. Polity Press.
- Giddens, A. (1999). Risk and Responsibility. The Modern Law Review, 62(1), 1–10.
10.1111/1468-2230.00188 Google Scholar
- Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (2000). The role of transportation in the persuasiveness of public narratives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(5), 701–721.
- Grupe, D. W., & Nitschke, J. B. (2013). Uncertainty and anticipation in anxiety: An integrated neurobiological and psychological perspective. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 14(7), 488–501.
- Hardy, C., & Maguire, S. (2016). Organizing risk: Discourse, power, and "riskification". Academy of Management Review, 41(1), 80–108.
- Hardisty, D. J., & Weber, E. U. (2009). Discounting future green: Money versus the environment. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 329–340.
- Hirose, K. (2012). 2011 Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant accident: Summary of regional radioactive deposition monitoring results. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 111, 13–17.
- Hu, Z. H., Sheu, J. B., & Xiao, L. (2014). Post-disaster evacuation and temporary resettlement considering panic and panic spread. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 69, 112–132.
10.1016/j.trb.2014.08.004 Google Scholar
- Ireland, M. E., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). Language style matching in writing: Synchrony in essays, correspondence, and poetry. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 549–571.
- Kacewicz, E., Pennebaker, J. W., Davis, M., Jeon, M., & Graesser, A. C. (2014). Pronoun use reflects standings in social hierarchies. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 33(2), 125–143.
- Kahn, J. H., Tobin, R. M., Massey, A. E., & Anderson, J. A. (2007). Measuring emotional expression with the linguistic inquiry and word count. The American Journal of Psychology, 120(2), 263–286.
- Karami, A., Shah, V., Vaezi, R., & Bansal, A. (2019). Twitter speaks: A case of national disaster situational awareness. Journal of Information Science, 46(3), 313–324.
10.1177/0165551519828620 Google Scholar
- Keller, C., Siegrist, M., & Gutscher, H. (2006). The role of the affect and availability heuristics in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 26(3), 631–639.
- Ki, E.-J., & Nekmat, E. (2014). Situational crisis communication and interactivity: Usage and effectiveness of Facebook for crisis management by Fortune 500 companies. Computers in Human Behavior, 35, 140–147.
- Kim, H. J., & Cameron, G. T. (2011). Emotions matter in crisis: The role of anger and sadness in the publics’ response to crisis news framing and corporate crisis response. Communication Research, 38(6), 826–855.
- Kramer, A. D., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(24), 8788–8790.
- Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford University Press.
10.1111/j.1432-2277.2005.00183.x Google Scholar
- Lee, C. H., & Yu, H. (2020). The impact of language on retweeting during acute natural disasters: Uncertainty reduction and language expectancy perspectives. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 120(8), 1501–1519.
- Lee, J., Jatowt, A., & Kim, K. S. (2021). Discovering underlying sensations of human emotions based on social media. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(4), 417–432.
- Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159.
- Loewenstein, G., & Thaler, R. H. (1989). Anomalies: intertemporal choice. Journal of Economic perspectives, 3(4), 181–193.
- MacKrill, K., Silvester, C., Pennebaker, J. W., & Petrie, K. J. (2021). What makes an idea worth spreading? Language markers of popularity in TED talks by academics and other speakers. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(8), 1028–1038.
- Maguire, S., & Hardy, C. (2013). Organizing processes and the construction of risk: A discursive approach. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 231–255.
- Maitlis, S., & Sonenshein, S. (2010). Sensemaking in crisis and change: Inspiration and insights from Weick (1988). Journal of Management Studies, 47(3), 551–580.
- Majid, U., Wasim, A., Bakshi, S., & Truong, J. (2020). Knowledge, (mis-) conceptions, risk perception, and behavior change during pandemics: A scoping review of 149 studies. Public Understanding of Science, 29(8), 777–799.
- Martínez-Rojas, M., Pardo-Ferreira, M. d. C., & Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2018). Twitter as a tool for the management and analysis of emergency situations: A systematic literature review. International Journal of Information Management, 43, 196–208.
- Mirlohi Falavarjani, S. A., Jovanovic, J., Fani, H., Ghorbani, A. A., Noorian, Z., & Bagheri, E. (2021). On the causal relation between real world activities and emotional expressions of social media users. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(6), 723–743.
- Nabi, R. L. (2003). Exploring the framing effects of emotion: Do discrete emotions differentially influence information accessibility, information seeking, and policy preference? Communication Research, 30(2), 224–247.
- Nadkarni, S., & Chen, J. H. (2014). Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1810–1833.
- Newman, M. L., Pennebaker, J. W., Berry, D. S., & Richards, J. M. (2003). Lying words: Predicting deception from linguistic styles. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 665–675.
- Pan, L., McNamara, G., Lee, J. J., Haleblian, J., & Devers, C. E. (2018). Give it to us straight (most of the time): Top managers’ use of concrete language and its effect on investor reactions. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8), 2204–2225.
- Pennebaker, J. W. (2011). The secret life of pronouns. New Scientist, 211(2828), 42–45.
- Pogrebnyakov, N., & Maldonado, E. (2018). Didn't roger that: Social media message complexity and situational awareness of emergency responders. International Journal of Information Management, 40, 166–174.
10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2018.02.004 Google Scholar
- Pappas, G., Kiriaze, I. J., Giannakis, P., & Falagas, M. E. (2009). Psychosocial consequences of infectious diseases. Clinical Microbiology and Infection, 15(8), 743–747.
- Renn, O. (2017). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. Routledge.
10.4324/9781849772440 Google Scholar
- Reuter, C., Hughes, A. L., & Kaufhold, M.-A. (2018). Social media in crisis management: An evaluation and analysis of crisis informatics research. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(4), 280–294.
- Reuter, C., & Kaufhold, M.-A. (2018). Fifteen years of social media in emergencies: A retrospective review and future directions for crisis informatics. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 26(1), 41–57.
- Reynolds, B., & Seeger, M. W. (2005). Crisis and emergency risk communication as an integrative model. Journal of Health Communication, 10(1), 43–55.
- Roeser, S. (2012). Risk communication, public engagement, and climate change: A role for emotions. Risk Analysis, 32(6), 1033–1040.
- Rush, J., & Grouzet, F. M. E. (2012). It is about time: Daily relationships between temporal perspective and well-being. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 7(5), 427–442.
10.1080/17439760.2012.713504 Google Scholar
- Shang, H., Feng, P., Zhang, J., & Chu, H. (2023). Calm or panic? A game-based method of emotion contagion for crowd evacuation. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 19(1), 1995529.
10.1080/23249935.2021.1995529 Google Scholar
- Shi, P. (2019). Hazards, disasters, and risks. In Disaster risk science (pp. 1–48). Springer.
- Shiller, R. J. (2020). Narrative economics: How stories go viral and drive major economic events. Princeton University Press.
- Shipp, A. J., & Aeon, B. (2019). Temporal focus: Thinking about the past, present, and future. Current Opinion in Psychology, 26, 37–43.
- Shipp, A. J., Edwards, J. R., & Lambert, L. S. (2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110(1), 1–22.
- Shipp, A. J., & Jansen, K. J. (2011). Reinterpreting time in fit theory: Crafting and recrafting narratives of fit in medias res. Academy of Management Review, 36(1), 76–101.
- Simon, T., Goldberg, A., & Adini, B. (2015). Socializing in emergencies—A review of the use of social media in emergency situations. International Journal of Information Management, 35(5), 609–619.
- Sjöberg, L., & Drottz-Sjöberg, B. M. (1991). Knowledge and risk perception among nuclear power plant employees. Risk Analysis, 11(4), 607–618.
- Slovic, P., Finucane, M., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2012). Risk as feeling: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. In The ethics of technological risk (pp. 177–195). Routledge.
- Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322.
- Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352.
- Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2013). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk and rationality. In The feeling of risk (pp. 21–36). Routledge.
10.4324/9781849776677 Google Scholar
- Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813–838.
- Smith, C. A., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 7(3–4), 233–269.
- Society for Risk Analysis. (2018). Society for risk analysis glossary. Society for Risk Analysis. https://www.sra.org/risk-analysis-introduction/risk-analysis-glossary
- Son, J., Lee, H. K., Jin, S., & Lee, J. (2019). Content features of tweets for effective communication during disasters: A media synchronicity theory perspective. International Journal of Information Management, 45, 56–68.
- Sugimoto, C. R., & Thelwall, M. (2013). Scholars on soap boxes: Science communication and dissemination in TED videos. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64(4), 663–674.
- Suhler, C., & Callender, C. (2012). Thank goodness that argument is over: Explaining the temporal value asymmetry. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan Publishing, University of Michigan Library.
- Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29(1), 24–54.
- Tchernev, J. M., Collier, J., & Wang, Z. (2023). There and back again? Exploring the real-time cognitive journey of narrative transportation. Communication Research, 50(3), 312–337.
10.1177/00936502211018577 Google Scholar
- Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110(3), 403–421.
- Vaast, E., Safadi, H., Lapointe, L., & Negoita, B. (2017). Social media affordances for connective action: An examination of microblogging use during the gulf of Mexico oil spill. MIS Quarterly, 41(4), 1179–1205.
- Van Laer, T., De Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(5), 797–817.
- Vieweg, S., Hughes, A. L., Starbird, K., & Palen, L. (2010). Microblogging during two natural hazards events: What twitter may contribute to situational awareness [Conference presentation]. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.
- Visschers, V. H. M., & Siegrist, M. (2008). Exploring the triangular relationship between trust, affect, and risk perception: A review of the literature. Risk Management, 10(3), 156–167.
10.1057/rm.2008.1 Google Scholar
- Wang, J., & Calder, B. J. (2006). Media transportation and advertising. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(2), 151–162.
- Weber, R., & Philip, R. (1990). Basic content analysis. Sage.
10.4135/9781412983488 Google Scholar
- Wei, J., Zhao, D., & Liang, L. (2009). Estimating the growth models of news stories on disasters. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(9), 1741–1755.
- World Economic Forum. (2018). The global risks report 2018. World Economic Forum. https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-risks-report-2018
- Wong, L. P., & Sam, I. C. (2010). Public sources of information and information needs for pandemic influenza a (H1N1). Journal of Community Health, 35, 676–682.
- Worrall, A., Cappello, A., & Osolen, R. (2021). The importance of socio-emotional considerations in online communities, social informatics, and information science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(10), 1247–1260.
- Xie, X. F., Wang, M., Zhang, R. G., Li, J., & Yu, Q. Y. (2011). The role of emotions in risk communication. Risk Analysis, 31(3), 450–465.
- Yates, D., & Paquette, S. (2011). Emergency knowledge management and social media technologies: A case study of the 2010 Haitian earthquake. International Journal of Information Management, 31(1), 6–13.
- Zajenkowski, M., Stolarski, M., Maciantowicz, O., Malesza, M., & Witowska, J. (2016). Time to be smart: Uncovering a complex interplay between intelligence and time perspectives. Intelligence, 58, 1–9.
- Zavyalova, A., Pfarrer, M. D., Reger, R. K., & Shapiro, D. L. (2012). Managing the message: The effects of firm actions and industry spillovers on media coverage following wrongdoing. Academy of Management journal, 55(5), 1079–1101.
- Zimbardo, P. G., & Boyd, J. N. (2015). Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable individual-differences metric. In M. Stolarski, N. Fieulaine, & W. Beek (Eds.), Time perspective theory; review, research and application: Essays in honor of Philip G. Zimbardo (pp. 17–55). Springer International Publishing.
10.1007/978-3-319-07368-2_2 Google Scholar
- Zinn, J. O., & Müller, M. (2022). Understanding discourse and language of risk. Journal of Risk Research, 25(3), 271–284.