Volume 28, Issue 4 e14771
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Optimizing pediatric liver transplantation: Evaluating the impact of donor age and graft type on patient survival outcome

Yong K. Kwon

Corresponding Author

Yong K. Kwon

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Division of Transplantation, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Surgery, Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Correspondence

Yong K. Kwon, Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, 4800 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Pamela L. Valentino

Pamela L. Valentino

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Patrick J. Healey

Patrick J. Healey

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Division of Transplantation, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Surgery, Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Andre A. S. Dick

Andre A. S. Dick

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Division of Transplantation, Seattle Children's Hospital, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Surgery, Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Evelyn K. Hsu

Evelyn K. Hsu

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Pediatrics, Seattle Children's Hospital, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
James D. Perkins

James D. Perkins

Department of Surgery, Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mark L. Sturdevant

Mark L. Sturdevant

Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Department of Surgery, Clinical and Bio-Analytics Transplant Laboratory, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 03 May 2024
Citations: 2

Yong K. Kwon and Pamela L. Valentino contributed equally.

Abstract

Background

We examined the combined effects of donor age and graft type on pediatric liver transplantation outcomes with an aim to offer insights into the strategic utilization of these donor and graft options.

Methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted using a national database on 0–2-year-old (N = 2714) and 3–17-year-old (N = 2263) pediatric recipients. These recipients were categorized based on donor age (≥40 vs <40 years) and graft type. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier and Cox proportional hazards models, followed by an intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis to examine overall patient survival.

Results

Living and younger donors generally resulted in better outcomes compared to deceased and older donors, respectively. This difference was more significant among younger recipients (0–2 years compared to 3–17 years). Despite this finding, ITT survival analysis showed that donor age and graft type did not impact survival with the exception of 0–2-year-old recipients who had an improved survival with a younger living donor graft.

Conclusions

Timely transplantation has the largest impact on survival in pediatric recipients. Improving waitlist mortality requires uniform surgical expertise at many transplant centers to provide technical variant graft (TVG) options and shed the conservative mindset of seeking only the “best” graft for pediatric recipients.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors of this manuscript have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.