Volume 22, Issue 7 e13277
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Comparison in outcome with tailored antibiotic prophylaxis postoperatively in pediatric intestinal transplant population

Brandon Chatani

Corresponding Author

Brandon Chatani

Pediatrics, Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, Florida

Correspondence: Brandon Chatani, MD, Division of Pediatric Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1580 NW 10th Ave, Miami, FL 33136-1015 ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this author
Jennifer Garcia

Jennifer Garcia

Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
Chiara Biaggi

Chiara Biaggi

Pediatric Gastroenterology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
Thiago Beduschi

Thiago Beduschi

Miami Transplant Institute, Miami, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
Akin Tekin

Akin Tekin

Miami Transplant Institute, Miami, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
Rodrigo Vianna

Rodrigo Vianna

Miami Transplant Institute, Miami, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
Kristopher Arheart

Kristopher Arheart

Biostatistics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
Ivan A. Gonzalez

Ivan A. Gonzalez

Pediatric Infectious Diseases, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 August 2018
Citations: 5

Abstract

BIs are ubiquitous among the pediatric intestinal transplant patient population. Personalizing postoperative prophylaxis antibiotic regimens may improve outcomes in this population. A retrospective analysis of all pediatric patients who underwent intestinal transplantation was evaluated to compare standardized and tailored regimens of antibiotics provided as prophylaxis postoperatively. Patients in the standard group have both shorter time to and higher rate of BIs, which was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Of the children who developed a BI, there was no statistical difference in average times to the development of a second BI (293 vs 119 days, P = 0.211). The tailored group had prolonged times until the development of a MDRO (52.6 vs 63.9 days, P = 0.677). Although not statistically significant, the tailored group had a propensity to present with gram-negative pathogens after transplant as compared to the standard regimen group, which presented with gram-positive pathogens (P = 0.103). Children with a history of an MDRO held a 7.3 (P < 0.01) times more likelihood of death within a year of transplant. A tailored prophylactic antibiotic regimen in the post-transplant period appears to prolong the time to the first BI. Although the data do not show differences in mortality, further study may prove the impact of a tailored antibiotic regimen on morbidity and mortality rates.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.