Original Article
A Structural Explanation of Injustice in Conversations: It's about Norms
Saray Ayala-López,
Saray Ayala-López
Philosophy Department California State University Sacramento
Search for more papers by this authorSaray Ayala-López,
Saray Ayala-López
Philosophy Department California State University Sacramento
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
In contrast to individualistic explanations of social injustice that appeal to implicit attitudes, structural explanations are unintuitive: they appeal to entities that lack clear ontological status, and the explanatory mechanism is similarly unclear. This makes structural explanations unappealing. The present work proposes a structural explanation of one type of injustice that happens in conversations, discursive injustice. This proposal meets two goals. First, it satisfactorily accounts for the specific features of this particular kind of injustice; and second, it articulates a structural explanation that overcomes their unattractiveness. The main idea is that discursive injustice is not the result of biased interlocutors, but of problematic discursive norms.
References
- Archer, M. S. (1979). Social Origins of Educational Systems. London: Sage.
- Austin, J. L. (1962). How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Ayala, S. (2016). ‘Speech Affordances: A Structural Take on How Much We Can Do with Our Words,’ European Journal of Philosophy 24(4), pp. 879–891.
- Ayala, S. and Vasilyeva, N. (2015). ‘ Explaining Speech Injustice: Individualistic vs. Structural Explanation,’ in D. C. Noelle, R. Dale, A. S. Warlaumont, J. Yoshimi, T. Matlock, C. D. Jennings, and P. P. Maglio (eds) Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
- Ayala-López, S. (ms.). ‘ Structures and Agency. Metaphysics and Explanations.’
- Baugh, J. (2000). ‘Racial Identification by Speech,’ American Speech 75(4), pp. 362–364.
- Bicchieri, C. (2006). The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Boyd, S. (2003). ‘Foreign-Born Teachers in the Multilingual Classroom in Sweden: The Role of Attitudes to Foreign Accent,’ International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism 6, pp. 283–295.
10.1080/13670050308667786 Google Scholar
- Bradac, J. J. (1990). ‘ Language Attitudes and Impression Formations,’ in H. Giles and W. Robinson (eds) Handbook of Language and Social Psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 387–412.
- Brown, B. L., Giles, H. and Thakerar, J. N. (1985). ‘Speaker Evaluations as a Function of Speech Rate, Accent and Context,’ Language & Communication 5, pp. 207–220.
- Buckley, W. (1967). Sociology and Modern Systems Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Chapman, E., Kaatz, A. and Carnes, M. (2013). ‘Physicians and Implicit Bias: How Doctors May Unwittingly Perpetuate Healthcare Disparities,’ Journal of General Internal Medicine 28(11), pp. 1504–1510.
- Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action and Cognitive Extension. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195333213.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Clark, A. and Chalmers, D. (1998). ‘The Extended Mind,’ Analysis 58, pp. 10–23.
- Davidson, L. and Kelly, D. (ms.) ‘ Minding the Gap: Soft Structures, and the Double Life of Social Norms’.
- Dotson, K. (2012). ‘A Cautionary Tale: On Limiting Epistemic Oppression,’ Frontiers 33(1), pp. 24–47.
- Dretske, F. (1988). Explaining Behaviour: Reasons in a World of Causes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Gallaguer, S. (2013). ‘The Socially Extended Mind,’ Cognitive Systems Research 25-26, pp. 4–12.
- Garfinkel, A. (1981). Forms of Explanation: Rethinking the Questions in Social Theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
- Gibson, J. J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA. Houghton Mifflin: Harcourt.
- Gilbert, M. (2008). ‘Social Norm Revisited,’ Topoi 27, pp. 5–16.
- Giles, H. (1973). ‘Communication Effectiveness as a Function of Accented speech,’ Speech Monographs 40, pp. 330–331.
- Green, A., Carney, D., Palin, D., Ngo, L., Raymond, K., Iezzoni, L. and Banaji, M. (2007). ‘Implicit Bias Among Physicians and its Prediction of Thrombolysis Decisions for Black and White Patients,’ Journal of General Internal Medicine 22(9), pp. 1231–1238.
- Haslanger, S. (2016). ‘What is a (Social) Structural Explanation?’ Philosophical Studies 173(1), pp. 113–130.
- Haslanger, S. (2015). ‘Social Structure, Narrative, and Explanation,’ Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45(1), pp. 1–15.
- Haslanger, S. (2006). ‘Philosophical Analysis and Social Kinds: What Good are Our Intuitions?’ Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society Sup 80, pp. 89–118.
10.1111/j.1467-8349.2006.00139.x Google Scholar
- Holton, R. (2006). ‘The Act of Choice,’ The Philosophers' Imprint 6(3), pp. 1–15.
- Huang, L., Frideger, M. and Pearce, J. (2013). ‘Political Skill: Explaining the Effects of Nonnative Accent on Managerial Hiring and Entrepreneurial Investment Decisions,’ Journal of Applied Psychology 98(6), pp. 1005–1017.
- Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the Wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/1881.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Hutchins, E. (2011). ‘Enculturating the Supersized Mind,’ Philosophical Studies 152(3), pp. 437–446.
- Johnson, I. and Fujita, K. (2012). ‘Change We Can Believe In: Using Perceptions of Changeability to Promote System-Change Motives Over System-Justification Motives in Information Search,’ Psychological Science http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0956797611423670.
- Krueger, J. (2011). ‘Extended Cognition and the Space of Social Interaction,’ Consciousness and Cognition 20(3), pp. 643–657.
- Kukla, R. (2014). ‘Performative Force, Norm, and Discursive Injustice,’ Hypatia 29(2), pp. 440–457.
- Langton, R. (1993). ‘Speech Acts and Unspeakable Acts,’ Philosophy & Public Affairs 22, pp. 293–330.
- Lewis, D. (1969). Norm: A Philosophical Study. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Lindemann, S. (2002). ‘Listening with an Attitude: A Model of Native-Speaker Comprehension of Nonnative Speakers in the United States,’ Language in Society 31, pp. 419–441.
- Lindemann, S. (2003). ‘Koreans, Chinese or Indians? Attitudes and Ideologies About Nonnative English Speakers in the United States,’ Journal of Sociolinguistics 7, pp. 348–364.
- Lippi-Green, R. (1997). English with an Accent: Language, Ideology, and Discrimination in the United States. London. New York: Routledge.
- Madva, A. (2016). ‘A Plea for Anti-Antiindividualism: How Oversimple Psychology Misleads Social Policy,’ Ergo 3, pp. 701–728.
- McGowan, M. K. (2004). ‘Conversational Exercitives: Something Else We Do with Our Words,’ Linguistics and Philosophy 27(1), pp. 93–111.
- McGowan, M. K. (2009). ‘Oppressive Speech,’ Australasian Journal of Philosophy 87(3), pp. 389–407.
- Medina, J. (2013). The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistance Imaginations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Medina, J. (2011). ‘The Relevance of Credibility Excess in a Proportional View of Epistemic Injustice: Differential Epistemic Authority and the Social Imaginary,’ Social Epistemology 25(1), pp. 15–35.
- Menary, R. (2007). Cognitive Integration: Mind and Cognition Unbounded. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
- Menary, R. (2010). The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/9780262014038.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Menary, R. (2013). ‘Cognitive Integration, Enculturated Cognition, and the Socially Extended Mind,’ Cognitive Systems Research 25–26, pp. 26–34.
- Rubin, D. L. (1992). ‘Nonlanguage Factors Affecting Undergraduates' Judgments of Nonnative English-speaking Teaching Assistants,’ Research in Higher Education 33(4), pp. 511–531.
- Saul, J. (2017). ‘Are Generics Especially Pernicious?’ Inquiry https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2017.1285995.
10.1080/0020174X.2017.1285995 Google Scholar
- Saul, J. (2013). ‘ Implicit Bias, Stereotype Threat and Women in Philosophy,’ in F. Jenkins and K. Hutchison (eds) Women in Philosophy: What Needs to Change? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199325603.003.0003 Google Scholar
- Stripada, C. and Stich, S. (2006). ‘ A Framework for the Psychology of Norms,’ in P. Carruthers, S. Laurence and S. Stich (eds) The Innate Mind, Volume 2: Culture and Cognition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Sutton, J. (2010). ‘ Exograms and Interdisciplinarity: History, the Extended Mind, and the Civilizing Process,’ in R. Menary (ed.) The Extended Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Theiner, G. (2013). ‘Writing in Mind,’ AVANT 4(2), pp. 15–29.
- Tomasello, M. (2009). Why We Cooperate. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
10.7551/mitpress/8470.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Uttich, K. and Lombrozo, T. (2010). ‘Norms Inform Mental State Ascriptions: A Rational Explanation for the Side-Effect Effect,’ Cognition 116, pp. 87–100.
- Vasilyeva, N. (ms.). ‘ Structural Explanations’.
- Vasilyeva, N. (2016). ‘ Structural Explanations: Structural Factors as Moderators and Constraints on Probable Outcomes’, presented at the 42nd Meeting of The Society for Philosophy and Psychology, 1–4 June 2016, Austin, TX.
