Volume 28, Issue 3 pp. 670-681
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Efficacy of topical administration for oral lichen planus: A network meta-analysis

Peiyang Yuan

Peiyang Yuan

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contribution: Data curation, Formal analysis, ​Investigation, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Xuemei Qiu

Xuemei Qiu

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contribution: Data curation, Validation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Lu Ye

Lu Ye

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Feifei Hou

Feifei Hou

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contribution: Data curation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Yuye Liang

Yuye Liang

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contribution: Validation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Han Jiang

Han Jiang

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contribution: ​Investigation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Yuting Zhang

Yuting Zhang

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contribution: Data curation, Visualization, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Yiming Xu

Yiming Xu

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contribution: ​Investigation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Yutong Sun

Yutong Sun

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contribution: ​Investigation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Xiaoting Deng

Xiaoting Deng

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Contribution: ​Investigation, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Hao Xu

Corresponding Author

Hao Xu

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Correspondence

Lu Jiang and Hao Xu, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China

Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
Lu Jiang

Corresponding Author

Lu Jiang

State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China

Correspondence

Lu Jiang and Hao Xu, State Key Laboratory of Oral Diseases, National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Oral Medicine, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, China

Emails: [email protected]; [email protected]

Contribution: Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Writing - review & editing

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 February 2021
Citations: 17

Abstract

Objective

To examine the comparative efficacy and safety of topical administration for oral lichen planus.

Materials and Methods

An electronic database search (1st January 1946 to 1st May 2020) for randomised controlled trials identified 34 studies involving eight interventions (clobetasol, betamethasone, triamcinolone, dexamethasone, fluocinolone, tacrolimus, pimecrolimus, and cyclosporine); these studies were subjected to network meta-analysis using direct and indirect comparisons [efficacy indicators: clinical response rate, symptom-reducing effect (visual analogue scale score), sign-reducing effect (Thongprasom-scale score) and relapse; safety indicator: adverse event occurrence].

Results

Compared with placebo, tacrolimus had the best clinical response rate (odds ratio (OR), 57.78 [95% CI 3.15–1060.52]; P–score, 0.8654) and cyclosporine had the worst (OR, 3.61[95% CI 0.20–66.62]; P–score, 0.2236); tacrolimus had the best symptom-reducing effect (standardised mean difference (SMD), 1.06 [95% CI 0.41–1.71]; P–score, 0.9323) and fluocinolone had the worst (SMD, −0.54 [95% CI −1.44–0.36]; P–score, 0.0157); dexamethasone had the best sign-reducing effect (SMD, 3.60 [95% CI 1.74–5.45]; P–score, 0.8306) and clobetasol had the worst (SMD, 2.63 [95% CI 1.66–3.61]; P–score, 0.2581); and pimecrolimus performed best (OR, 0.04 [95% CI 0.00–0.64]; P–score, 0.9227) and clobetasol performed the worst [OR, 0.60; 95% CI 0.15–2.45; P–score, 0.2545] in reducing relapse. Regarding safety, dexamethasone was the safest compared with placebo [OR, 0.37; 95% CI 0.05–2.57; P–score, 0.9337), whereas fluocinolone ranked low for safety [OR, 9.48; 95% CI 1.50– 60.03; P–score, 0.1189].

Conclusions

The relative ranking of topical administration varies according to the different indicators. Based on the joint consideration of clinical response rate and adverse event occurrence, dexamethasone, triamcinolone and betamethasone are recommended for better efficacy and safety. The optimal treatment for oral lichen patients varies under different conditions.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors state they have no conflicts of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All data generated or analysed during this study was taken from published RCTs and systematic reviews. The data are included in this article (and its supporting file.)

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.