Volume 24, Issue 10 e13607
REVIEW

Efficacy and safety of revisional treatments for weight regain or insufficient weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Rutger J. Franken

Corresponding Author

Rutger J. Franken

Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands

Correspondence

Rutger Franken, Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, Spaarnepoort 1, 2134 TM Hoofddorp, The Netherlands.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Josephine Franken

Josephine Franken

Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Nina R. Sluiter

Nina R. Sluiter

Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Ralph de Vries

Ralph de Vries

Medical Library, AUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Sjoerd Euser

Sjoerd Euser

Department of Epidemiology, Regional Public Health Laboratory Kennemerland, Haarlem, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Victor E. A. Gerdes

Victor E. A. Gerdes

Department of Internal Medicine, Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands

Department of Vascular Medicine, AUMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
Maurits de Brauw

Maurits de Brauw

Department of Surgery, Spaarne Gasthuis Hoofddorp, Hoofddorp, the Netherlands

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 28 July 2023

Summary

Weight regain or inadequate weight loss following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass poses a significant clinical challenge. Our objective was to evaluate various revisional techniques for addressing weight regain and insufficient weight loss after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass through a systematic review and meta-analysis. We performed a literature search (in PubMed and Embase) on revisional interventions in collaboration with a medical information specialist. Measured outcomes included body mass index at intervention, total weight loss during follow-up, and complications. Random effects models were used to determine pooled effect size and corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Thirty-nine studies were included: four studies reported on argon plasma coagulation, four studies on transoral outlet reduction, nine studies on transoral outlet reduction + argon plasma coagulation, four studies on pouch/gastrojejunal anastomosis revision, five on laparoscopic gastric banding, two studies on laparoscopic gastric banding + pouch resizing, 10 on distalization-RYGB, and one on duodenal switch. All techniques resulted in short-term clinically relevant weight loss. Endoscopic procedures had a short follow-up and resulted in modest and temporary weight loss. Surgical revision techniques were successful for weight loss in longer term follow-up, at the expense of high complication rates.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

No conflict of interest statement.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.