The Relationship Between Dyadic Type and Quality of Life in Patients With Stroke: Mediating Effects of Depression, Anxiety, and Health-Promoting Behaviors
Hyun Kyung Chung
Department of Nursing, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sung Reul Kim
College of Nursing, Korea University Nursing Research Institute, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Correspondence:
Sung Reul Kim ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorSoo Kyung Park
College of Nursing, Korea University Nursing Research Institute, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorYong Jae Kim
Department of Neurology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorHyun Kyung Chung
Department of Nursing, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Sung Reul Kim
College of Nursing, Korea University Nursing Research Institute, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Correspondence:
Sung Reul Kim ([email protected])
Search for more papers by this authorSoo Kyung Park
College of Nursing, Korea University Nursing Research Institute, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorYong Jae Kim
Department of Neurology, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
Search for more papers by this authorFunding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
ABSTRACT
This study aimed to identify the mediating effects of depression, anxiety, and health promoting behaviors (HPB) on the relationship between dyadic types and quality of life (QoL) in patients with stroke. This study used a cross-sectional correlational study design. Participants were 147 dyads (outpatients and their caregivers) from the department of neurology at a university hospital in Seoul, South Korea. The dyadic types were collaborative-oriented (37.4%), patient-oriented (32.7%), incongruent (20.4%), and caregiver-oriented (9.5%). The caregiver-oriented type had higher depression and anxiety scores, and the collaborative-oriented type had higher HPB. Patient- and collaborative-oriented types had higher QoL. In a hierarchical regression analysis, the factors influencing QoL were language deficit, modified Rankin Scale score, hyperlipidemia, depression, and HPB. In addition, depression, anxiety, and HPB had partial mediating effects on the relationship between dyadic type and QoL. Therefore, the dyadic type should be evaluated together when evaluating QoL along with depression, anxiety, and health-promoting behaviors, since the dyadic type influences QoL. In addition, interventions considering dyadic type are required, and these strategies may contribute to improving HPB and QoL in patients with stroke.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Open Research
Data Availability Statement
The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.
References
- Bangad, A., M. Abbasi, and A. de Havenon. 2023. “Secondary Ischemic Stroke Prevention.” Neurotherapeutics 20, no. 3: 721–731. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13311-023-01352-w.
- Buck, H. G., J. Hupcey, R. Juárez-Vela, E. Vellone, and B. Riegel. 2019. “Heart Failure Care Dyadic Typology: Initial Conceptualization, Advances in Thinking, and Future Directions of a Clinically Relevant Classification System.” Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 34, no. 2: 159–165. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0000000000000548.
- Buck, H. G., L. Kitko, and J. E. Hupcey. 2013. “Dyadic Heart Failure Care Types: Qualitative Evidence for a Novel Typology.” Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 28, no. 6: E37–E46. https://doi.org/10.1097/JCN.0b013e31827fcc4c.
- Buck, H. G., A. Stromberg, M. L. Chung, K. A. Donovan, K. Harkness, and A. M. Howard. 2018. “A Systematic Review of Heart Failure Dyadic Self-Care Interventions Focusing on Intervention Components, Contexts, and Outcomes.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 77, no. 1: 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2017.10.007.
- Bugajski, A., H. Buck, V. Zeffiro, et al. 2021. “The Influence of Dyadic Congruence and Satisfaction With Dyadic Type on Patient Self-Care in Heart Failure.” European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 20, no. 3: 268–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/1474515120960002.
- Butsing, N., M. Tipayamongkholgul, D. Ratanakorn, N. Suwannapong, and K. Bundhamcharoen. 2019. “Social Support, Functional Outcome and Quality of Life Among Stroke Survivors in an Urban Area.” Journal of Pacific Rim Psychology 13: e4. https://doi.org/10.1017/prp.2019.2.
- Carr, R. M., A. Prestwich, D. Kwasnicka, et al. 2019. “Dyadic Interventions to Promote Physical Activity and Reduce Sedentary Behaviour: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Health Psychology Review 13, no. 1: 91–109. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1532312.
- Chen, M., M. Wang, M. Qiao, et al. 2024. “Determinants Influencing Health-Promoting Behaviors in Individuals at High Risks of Stroke: A Cross-Sectional Study.” Frontiers in Public Health 12: 1323277. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1323277.
- De Maria, M., F. Ferro, D. Ausili, H. G. Buck, E. Vellone, and M. Matarese. 2021. “Characteristics of Dyadic Care Types Among Patients Living With Multiple Chronic Conditions and Their Informal Caregivers.” Journal of Advanced Nursing 77, no. 12: 4768–4781. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15033.
- Feigin, V. L., M. Brainin, B. Norrving, et al. 2022. “World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022.” International Journal of Stroke 17, no. 1: 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/17474930211065917.
- GBD 2021 Stroke Risk Factor Collaborators. 2024. “Global, Regional, and National Burden of Stroke and Its Risk Factors, 1990−2021: A Systematic Analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.” Lancet Neurology 23, no. 10: 973–1003. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00757-8.
- Grant, C. J., L. F. Doig, J. Everson, N. Foster, and C. J. Doig. 2020. “Impact of Patient and Family Involvement in Long-Term Outcomes.” Critical Care Nursing Clinics of North America 32, no. 2: 227–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cnc.2020.02.005.
- Hayes, A. F. 2013. Introduction to Mediation, Moderation, and Conditional Process Analysis: A Regression-Based Approach. Guilford Press.
- Hong, K. S. 2006. “Outcome Measure and Efficacy Analysis in Stroke Clinical Trials.” Journal of the Korean Neurological Association 24, no. 5: 411–420.
- Irani, E., H. G. Buck, K. S. Lyons, et al. 2023. “Examining How Congruence in and Satisfaction With Dyadic Care Type Appraisal Contribute to Quality of Life in Heart Failure Care Dyads.” European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing 22, no. 2: 158–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurjcn/zvac052.
- Jo, Y., M. S. Hyun, and J. H. Park. 2019. “Effects of Self-Efficacy and Social Support on Health Promotion Behaviors of Patients With Stroke.” Journal of Muscle and Joint Health 26, no. 3: 167–174. https://doi.org/10.5953/JMJH.2019.26.3.167.
10.5953/JMJH.2019.26.3.167 Google Scholar
- Kang, S. W., S. H. Lee, Y. S. Lee, et al. 2022. “Association Between Depression and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients: The Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) IV-VII (2008-2018).” PLoS One 17, no. 6: e0269010. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269010.
- Kim, E. S., J. W. Kim, H. J. Kang, et al. 2018. “Longitudinal Impact of Depression on Quality of Life in Stroke Patients.” Psychiatry Investigation 15, no. 2: 141–146. https://doi.org/10.30773/pi.2017.10.11.
- Kim, J. S. 2016. “Post-Stroke Mood and Emotional Disturbances: Pharmacological Therapy Based on Mechanisms.” Journal of Stroke 18, no. 3: 244–255. https://doi.org/10.5853/jos.2016.01144.
- Kim, M., and Y. Lee. 2021. “Reliability and Validity of the Korean Version of Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire.” Journal of Neuroscience Nursing 53, no. 1: 49–54. https://doi.org/10.1097/JNN.0000000000000560.
- Kim, S. R., S. Kim, B. H. Cho, S. Yu, and K. H. Cho. 2021. “Influence of Type D Personality on Health Promoting Behaviours and Quality of Life in Stroke Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study in South Korea.” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 30, no. 5: 105721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105721.
- Kolmos, M., L. Christoffersen, and C. Kruuse. 2021. “Recurrent Ischemic Stroke—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Stroke and Cerebrovascular Diseases 30, no. 8: 105935. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105935.
- Kosasih, C. E., B. Punthmatharith, and U. Boonyasopun. 2020. “Family Support for Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Advanced Pharmacy Education & Research 10, no. 3: 47–56.
10.51847/cDD3kdr Google Scholar
- Lawrence, M., S. Kerr, C. McVey, and J. Godwin. 2012. “The Effectiveness of Secondary Prevention Lifestyle Interventions Designed to Change Lifestyle Behavior Following Stroke: Summary of a Systematic Review.” International Journal of Stroke 7, no. 3: 243–247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-4949.2012.00771.x.
- Lee, C. S., E. Vellone, K. S. Lyons, A. Cocchieri, J. T. Bidwell, and F. D'Agostino. 2015. “Patterns and Predictors of Patient and Caregiver Engagement in Heart Failure Care: A Multi-Level Dyadic Study.” International Journal of Nursing Studies 52, no. 2: 588–597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.11.005.
- Lui, S. K., and M. H. Nguyen. 2018. “Elderly Stroke Rehabilitation: Overcoming the Complications and Its Associated Challenges.” Current Gerontology and Geriatrics Research 2018: 9853837. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9853837.
- Lyons, K. S., and C. S. Lee. 2018. “The Theory of Dyadic Illness Management.” Journal of Family Nursing 24, no. 1: 8–28. https://doi.org/10.1177/1074840717745669.
- Miller, L. M., J. A. Kaye, K. S. Lyons, C. S. Lee, C. J. Whitlatch, and M. S. Caserta. 2019. “Well-Being in Dementia: A Cross-Sectional Dyadic Study of the Impact of Multiple Dimensions of Strain on PersonsL With Dementia and Their Family Care Partners.” International Psychogeriatrics 31, no. 5: 617–626. https://doi.org/10.1017/S104161021800203X.
- Munce, S. E. P., L. Perrier, S. Shin, et al. 2020. “Impact of Quality Improvement Strategies on the Quality of Life of Individuals Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review.” Disability and Rehabilitation 42, no. 8: 1055–1061. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2018.1512163.
- Noh, J. W., H. Y. Yun, H. Park, and S. E. Yu. 2015. “A Study of Predictive Factors Affecting Health: Promoting Behaviors of North Korean Adolescent Refugees.” Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health 48, no. 5: 231–238. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.14.045.
- Oh, S., K. J. Min, and D. B. Park. 1999. “A Comparison of Normal, Depressed and Anxious Groups: A Study on the Standardization of the Hospital Anxiety and Depressed Scale for Koreans.” Journal of Korean Neuropsychiatric Association 38, no. 2: 289–296.
- Poomalai, G., S. Prabhakar, and N. S. Jagadesh. 2023. “Functional Ability and Health Problems of StrokeS: An Explorative Study.” Cureus 15, no. 1: e33375. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.33375.
- Rafsten, L., A. Danielsson, and K. S. Sunnerhagen. 2018. “Anxiety After Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 50, no. 9: 769–778. https://doi.org/10.2340/16501977-2384.
- Statistics Korea. 2024. “2023 Statistics on Causes of Death.” https://kostat.go.kr/board.es?mid=a10301010000&bid=218&act=view&list_no=433106.
- van Swieten, J. C., P. Koudstaal, M. Visser, H. Schouten, and v. J. Gijn. 1988. “Interobserver Agreement for the Assessment of Handicap in Stroke Patients.” Stroke 19, no. 5: 604–607. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.19.5.604.
- Walker, S. N., K. R. Sechrist, and N. J. Pender. 1995. The Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile II. University of Nebraska Medical center, College of Nursing.
- Wang, X., C. X. Hu, M. Q. Lin, S. Y. Liu, F. Y. Zhu, and L. H. Wan. 2022. “Family Functioning Is Associated With Post-Stroke Depression in First-Ever Stroke Survivors: A Longitudinal Study.” Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment 18: 3045–3054. https://doi.org/10.2147/NDT.S393331.
- Williams, L. S., M. Weinberger, L. E. Harris, D. O. Clark, and J. Biller. 1999. “Development of a Stroke-Specific Quality of Life Scale.” Stroke 30, no. 7: 1362–1369. https://doi.org/10.1161/01.str.30.7.1362.
- Yao, H., J. Zhang, Y. Wang, Q. Wang, F. Zhao, and P. Zhang. 2021. “Stroke Risk and Its Association With Quality of Life: A Cross-Sectional Study Among Chinese Urban Adults.” Health and Quality of Life Outcomes 19, no. 1: 236. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01868-9.
- Zhou, H., and E. R. Kulick. 2023. “Social Support and Depression Among Stroke Patients: A Topical Review.” International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 20, no. 24: 7157. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20247157.
- Zigmond, A. S., and R. P. Snaith. 1983. “The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.” Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica 67, no. 6: 361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x.
