Volume 36, Issue S1 pp. 13-20
Review Article
Free Access

Why I do not treat patients for mild disease

Christophe Hézode

Corresponding Author

Christophe Hézode

Department of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Université Paris-Est, INSERM U955, Créteil, France

Correspondence

Prof Christophe Hézode, MD, PhD, Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, 51 avenue du maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94000 Créteil, France

Tel: +33 149812325; Fax: +33 149812352

e-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 January 2016
Citations: 5
Handling editor: Francesco Negro

Abstract

The short-term prognosis of patients with chronic hepatitis C and mild disease is excellent. Monitoring of the progression of fibrosis is easy to perform with non-invasive tests. Current all-oral interferon (IFN)- and ribavirin (RBV)-free regimens offer sustained viral response (SVR) rates of more than 90% as well as 12-weeks of treatment for most patients with mild disease. Several DAA combinations can be selected to optimize efficacy and safety outcomes. A short treatment duration of 8 weeks could be indicated in most patients with mild disease. However, additional data from clinical trials and real-life experience are needed to confirm this option. Moreover, current regimens are not cost-effective for patients with mild disease. In practice, deferral of HCV treatment for a few years and monitoring the progression of fibrosis is a safe option until cheaper, shorter, more effective and more convenient HCV regimens become available.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.