Volume 30, Issue 2 pp. 111-118
Original Manuscript

Clinical and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Single Posterior Implant-Supported Restorations Completed by Predoctoral Students: A Retrospective Study with Up to 10 Years of Follow Up

Despoina Bompolaki DDS MS FACP

Corresponding Author

Despoina Bompolaki DDS MS FACP

Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

Correspondence

Despoina Bompolaki, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, 2730 S Moody Ave Portland, OR 97201.

E-mail: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Sara A. Edmondson DMD

Sara A. Edmondson DMD

Resident, Graduate Orthodontics, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN

Search for more papers by this author
James A. Katancik DDS PhD

James A. Katancik DDS PhD

Professor and Chair, Department of Periodontology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR

Search for more papers by this author
Phophi Kamposiora DDS MS PhD

Phophi Kamposiora DDS MS PhD

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
George Papavasiliou DDS MS PhD

George Papavasiliou DDS MS PhD

Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Greece

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 16 November 2020
Citations: 6
Funding: American Academy of Implant Dentistry.
Conflict of Interest Statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Abstract

Purpose

To assess clinical outcomes of screw-retained implant-supported restorations as well as patient satisfaction and Oral Health-related Quality of Life (OHQoL), when treatment is performed in an academic setting by supervised predoctoral students.

Materials and methods

Ninety patients (n = 129 restorations) consented to participate in the study. The mean follow-up period was 4.2 years (range: 4 months to 10.6 years) after crown insertion. All patients filled out a modified Oral Health Impact Profile questionnaire, consisting of 14 questions (OHIP-14). A comprehensive examination of the implant-supported restoration was completed and restorative complications were recorded. Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS (IBM SPSS Statistics, v25; IBM Corp). Restoration survival rates were calculated using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results

The most frequent complication was loss of the mesial interproximal contact (32.2%). The overall restoration survival and success rates were 93.8% and 74.4%, respectively. The majority of patients (95.6%) reported high satisfaction with their decision to get implant treatment in the predoctoral clinic.

Conclusions

In the context of this study, clinical and patient-based outcomes of implant treatment rendered in an academic setting are favorable and comparable to those reported in the literature for restorations completed by experienced dentists.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.