Volume 29, Issue 3-4 pp. 567-582
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Patients’ satisfaction and experiences during elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey: A qualitative study

Miia Marika Jansson PhD

Corresponding Author

Miia Marika Jansson PhD

Postdoctoral researcher

Research Group of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

Correspondence

Miia Marika Jansson Postdoctoral researcher, PhD, Oulu Business School, PO Box 8000, FI-90014 University of Oulu, Finland.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Marja Harjumaa PhD

Marja Harjumaa PhD

Senior scientist

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Oulu, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Ari-Pekka Puhto MD, PhD

Ari-Pekka Puhto MD, PhD

Division of Operative Care, Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
Minna Pikkarainen PhD

Minna Pikkarainen PhD

Professor of Connected Health

Research Group of Medical Imaging, Physics and Technology, University of Oulu, Oulu, Finland

VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Oulu, Finland

Martti Ahtisaari Institute, Oulu Business School, Oulu University, Oulu, Finland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 26 November 2019
Citations: 23

Funding information

This research has been supported by a grant from Business Finland as part of a project called “Intelligent Customer-driven Solution for Orthopedic and Pediatric Surgery Care.” The funder has not influenced the design, conduct, analysis or reporting of the study.

Abstract

Aims and objectives

To explore how satisfied patients are with the process of treatment and care and to identify the experiences that patients perceive during elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty journey.

Background

Greater satisfaction with care has predicted better quality of recovery, and patient experience has been positively associated with patient safety and clinical effectiveness. However, a little is still known about how patients experience their treatment and care.

Design

A qualitative interview study.

Methods

The study was conducted among 20 patients in a single joint replacement centre during 2018. Patient satisfaction was measured using a numerical rating scale. Patients’ experiences were identified through qualitative semi-structured interviews which were analysed using an inductive content analysis method. The COREQ checklist was used (Supporting Information).

Results

The mean numerical rating scale score for overall satisfaction was 9.0 (SD 1.1) on a scale from 0–10. The patients’ experiences were grouped under eight main categories that were derived from the qualitative data in the analysis: (a) patient selection, (b) meeting the Health Care Guarantee, (c) patient flow, (d) postdischarge care, (e) patient counselling, (f) transparency of the journey, (g) communication and (h) feedback.

Conclusions

The findings suggest that patients are highly satisfied after an elective primary fast-track total hip and knee arthroplasty. However, closer analysis of the patients’ experiences reveals challenges and suggestions on how they could be solved, often involving digital technologies.

Relevance to clinical practice

As the number of total joint arthroplasties grows, patients and their families need to take ever greater responsibility, for their own care from advance preparation to rehabilitation. The findings of the study can be used to organise work, improving patient-clinical communication, fostering engagement and improving patient centredness. In addition, the results pinpoint the issues on how the patient experience could be improved.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors have no conflict of interest.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets generated and analysed are not publicly available. Datasets are available from the authors on reasonable request and with permission from the relevant academic centre.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.