Crosstalk between heat shock factor 1 and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 mediated by interleukin-8 autocrine signaling maintains the cancer stem cell phenotype in liver cancer
Zhengyan Yang
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorWenjuan Wan
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorPai Zhang
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorShuangfeng Wang
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Prevention and Treatment of Severe Infections, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
Search for more papers by this authorZhi Zhao
Henan University-Affiliated Zhengzhou Yihe Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Search for more papers by this authorJingrui Xue
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorMengzhuo Yao
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorYiwei Zhao
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorWeifeng Zheng
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorBaohua Niu
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorMingli Wang
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorHui Li
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorWeikai Guo
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Zhiguang Ren
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Correspondence
Zhiguang Ren and Yanzhong Hu, Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yanzhong Hu
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Correspondence
Zhiguang Ren and Yanzhong Hu, Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorZhengyan Yang
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorWenjuan Wan
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorPai Zhang
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
These authors contributed equally to this work.Search for more papers by this authorShuangfeng Wang
Shenzhen Key Laboratory of Prevention and Treatment of Severe Infections, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Shenzhen People's Hospital, Shenzhen, China
Search for more papers by this authorZhi Zhao
Henan University-Affiliated Zhengzhou Yihe Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
Search for more papers by this authorJingrui Xue
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorMengzhuo Yao
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorYiwei Zhao
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorWeifeng Zheng
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorBaohua Niu
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorMingli Wang
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorHui Li
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorWeikai Guo
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Zhiguang Ren
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Institute of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Correspondence
Zhiguang Ren and Yanzhong Hu, Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Yanzhong Hu
Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng, China
Correspondence
Zhiguang Ren and Yanzhong Hu, Joint National Laboratory for Antibody Drug Engineering, The First Affiliated Hospital, School of Basic Medicine, Henan University, Kaifeng 475004, China.
Email: [email protected]; [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorDeclaration of conflict of interest: The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.
Author contribution: Zhengyan Yang: Conceptualization and writing—original draft preparation. Wenjuan Wan: Cell culture and cell biology experiments. Pai Zhang: Immunohistochemical staining and bioinformatics analysis. Shuangfeng Wang: Animal experiments. Zhi Zhao: Collecting clinical liver cancer samples. Jingrui Xue: ELISA assays. Mengzhuo Yao: Data curation. Yiwei Zhao: Q-PCR experiments. Weifeng Zheng: Vector construction. Baohua Niu: Pathological analysis. Mingli Wang: Purchase animals. Hui Li: Statistical analysis. Weikai Guo: Methodology. Zhiguang Ren: Writing—reviewing and editing. Yanzhong Hu: Project administration.
Financial support: This work was supported by grants from the Youth Fund of National Natural Science Foundation of China (nos. 81803575 and 31902287), Kaifeng Science and Technology Development Plan Project (no. 21SSF003), Key Scientific Research Projects of Colleges and Universities in Henan Province (no. 21A310003), Youth Fund of Natural Science Foundation of Henan (no. 212300410108), and National College Students Innovation and Entrepreneurship Training Program (no. 202010475057).
Abstract
Background and Aim
Liver cancer stem cells (LCSCs) cause therapeutic refractoriness and relapse in hepatocellular carcinoma. Heat shock factor 1 (HSF1) plays versatile roles in multiple cancers. However, the role of HSF1 in LCSCs is not well understood. This study investigated the function and signal mechanisms of HSF1 in maintaining LCSC phenotypes.
Methods
We established two LCSC lines, HepG2-R and HuH-7-R. Constitutive activation of HSF1 was observed in these LCSCs. Specific short hairpin RNAs (shRNAs) and chemical inhibitors were used to identify the relationship between HSF1 expression and LCSCs phenotypes.
Results
We revealed a concomitant activation modality involving HSF1 and STAT3 in LCSCs and liver cancer tissues. We also found that liver cancer patients whose HSF1 and STAT3 mRNA expression levels were high presented with unfavorable clinicopathological characteristics. Moreover, the secretion of interleukin-8 (IL-8) was elevated in the LCSC medium and was directly regulated by HSF1 at the transcriptional level. In turn, IL-8 activated HSF1 and STAT3 signaling, and a neutralizing IL-8 antibody inhibited HSF1 and STAT3 activity, reduced cancer stem cell marker expression, and decreased LCSC microsphere formation. Simultaneous intervention with HSF1 and STAT3 led to synergistically suppressed stemness acquisition and growth suppression in the LCSCs in vivo and in vitro.
Conclusions
Our study indicates that IL-8 mediates the crosstalk between the HSF1 and Stat3 signaling pathways in LCSCs and that the combined targeting of HSF1 and STAT3 is a promising treatment strategy for patients with advanced liver cancer.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
jgh16040-sup-0001-Supplementary Information.docxWord 2007 document , 46.7 KB |
Table S1. The list of real-time PCR primers used in this study. Table S2. Correlation between HSF1HighSTAT3Low and HSF1HighSTAT3High expression and clinicopathologic characteristics of liver cancer patients Table S3. Correlation between HSF1LowSTAT3High and HSF1HighSTAT3High expression and clinicopathologic characteristics of liver cancer patients Table S4. Correlation between HSF1LowSTAT3Low and HSF1HighSTAT3High expression and clinicopathologic characteristics of liver cancer patients |
jgh16040-sup-0002-SI-Figure 1.tiffTIFF image, 7.7 MB |
Figure S1. The expression of CSC markers and signaling in HepG2 and HepG2-R xenograft tumors was examined by immunohistochemistry with antibodies (Abs) against P-gp, CD24, CD133, β-catenin, p-HSF1, and p-STAT3. Bar = 200 μm. |
jgh16040-sup-0003-SI-Figure 2.tiffTIFF image, 1.2 MB |
Figure S2. The integral density of the protein bands of p-HSF1, HSF1 and GAPDH shown in Fig. 2A (left) and Fig. 2G (right) was analyzed with ImageJ software. The experiments were repeated two times. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. |
jgh16040-sup-0004-SI-Figure 3.tifTIFF image, 1.8 MB |
Figure S3. A, HepG2 and HepG2-R cells were cotransfected with pGL3.basic-HSF1 promoter and pGMLR-TK vectors and cultured for 60 h. HSF1 transcriptional activity was analyzed by luciferase assay. B, HSF1 mRNA levels in HepG2 and HepG2-R cells were detected by real-time RT–PCR. C, HepG2 cells were cotransfected with the pGL3.0 basic-ABCB1 promoter and pGMLR-TK vectors and cultured for 60 h. Then, the cells were heated for 1 h at 43°C and allowed to recover for 2 h at 37°C. Unheated cells were used as controls. ABCB1 transcriptional activity was analyzed by luciferase assay. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. |
jgh16040-sup-0005-SI-Figure 4.tiffTIFF image, 1.2 MB |
Figure S4. Effect of HSF1 knockdown on HSP27 expression. HepG2-R cells were transfected with scramble or HSF1-shRNA plasmids and treated with or without 31.25 nM adriamycin for 48 h. The expression of HSP27 and GAPDH was analyzed by Western blotting. |
jgh16040-sup-0006-SI-Figure 5.tiffTIFF image, 2.2 MB |
Figure S5. Knocking down HSF1 expression led to upregulated IL-6 mRNA expression and STAT3 activation in HCC cells. HepG2-R and HuH-7-R cells were transfected with pLKO.1-scramble and HSF1-shRNA vectors and cultured for 60 h. IL-6 mRNA levels were detected by real-time RT–PCR (A and B). The experiments were repeated three times. ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. HepG2 cells were starved for 2 h in serum-free medium and then treated with rhIL-6 (10 ng/ml) for the indicated durations. The expression of p-STAT3, STAT3, p-HSF1, HSF1, and GAPDH was detected by Western blotting (C). |
jgh16040-sup-0007-SI-Figure 6.tifTIFF image, 1.7 MB |
Figure S6. Effect of exogenous overexpression of HSF1 on STAT3 activation. HepG2-R cells were transfected with pCDH-MCS-CMV-EF1-puro and HSF1-OX vectors and cultured for 72 h. The expression of p-HSF1 (Ser326), HSF1, p-STAT3 (Y705), STAT3, and GAPDH was analyzed by Western blotting. |
jgh16040-sup-0008-SI-Figure 7.tiffTIFF image, 905 KB |
Figure S7. The proliferation inhibitory effects of KRIBB11 and Stattic in combination with adriamycin. HepG2-R cells were seeded in 96-well plates in triplicate at an initial cell density of 3×103 cells/well. KRIBB11 (2.5 μM, left) and Stattic (2.5 μM, right) in combination with or without 500 nM adriamycin. The in vitro proliferation activity was analyzed by MTS assay. The experiments were repeated two times. ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. |
jgh16040-sup-0009-SI-Figure 8.tiffTIFF image, 2.3 MB |
Figure S8. A, The expression of p-HSF1, HSF1, p-STAT3, STAT3, p-ERK, ERK, p-Akt, Akt, and GAPDH in WRL-68, LO2, HepG2, SMMC-7721, HuH-7, and SMMC-7402 cells was analyzed. B, P-HSF1, HSF1, p-STAT3, and STAT3 bands of HepG2, HepG2-R, SMMC-7721, HuH-7, HuH-7-R, and SMMC-7402 cells were quantified with ImageJ software. The intensities represents the ratio of p-HSF1 to HSF1 and p-STAT3 to STAT3. The Pearson correlation between the intensity of p-HSF1 and p-STAT3 was analyzed by GraphPad Prism 6.0. |
jgh16040-sup-0010-SI-Figure 9.tiffTIFF image, 889.5 KB |
Figure S9. A, The mRNA levels of IL-8 in the relapsed and nonrelapsed HCC patient samples in the TCGA database were analyzed by GraphPad Prism 6.0. B, The correlation between CXCL-8 expression and overall survival of liver cancer patients was predicted by GEPIA (http://gepia.cancer-pku.cn/). |
jgh16040-sup-0011-SI-Figure 10.tiffTIFF image, 165.5 KB |
Figure S10. Upregulation and activation of HSF1 directly regulated the transcriptional activity of IL-8 in HCC cells. HepG2-vector and HepG2-HSF1-OX cells were transfected with pGL4.20-IL-8 promoter and pRL-TK vectors and cultured for 48 h. Then, the cells were treated with various concentrations of adriamycin (0, 62.5, and 125 nM) for 24 h. IL-8 transcriptional activity was analyzed by luciferase assay. The experiments were repeated three times. **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. |
jgh16040-sup-0012-SI-Figure 11.tiffTIFF image, 4.4 MB |
Figure S11. IL-8 mediates the coactivation of HSF1-STAT3 and the expression of CSC markers in HCC cells. HepG2 cells were cultured overnight and starved for 2 h in serum-free medium and then treated with rhIL-8 (50 ng/ml) for the indicated durations. The expression of p-STAT3, STAT3, p-HSF1, HSF1, P-gp, CD133, CD24, β-catenin, and GAPDH was detected by Western blotting. |
jgh16040-sup-0013-SI-Figure 12.tiffTIFF image, 1 MB |
Figure S12. IL-8 increased the transcriptional activity of HSF1 and STAT3 reporters in HCC cells. HepG2 cells were transfected with a pGL4.26-HSF1-reporter (A) and pGL4.26-STAT3-reporter (B). After 48 h, the transfected cells were treated with 20 ng/ml rhIL-8 for 0, 6, and 9 h. The transcriptional activity of HSF1 and STAT3 was analyzed by luciferase assay. The experiments were repeated three times. *p<0.05; **p<0.01; ***p<0.001; ****p<0.0001. |
jgh16040-sup-0014-SI-Figure 13.tiffTIFF image, 1.7 MB |
Figure S13. IL-8 neutralization antibodies reversed the CSC phenotype acquired by liver cancer cells. HepG2-R cells were treated with 0, 50, and 100 ng/ml neutralizing antibody against human IL-8 for 24 h. The expression of CD133, OCT-4, β-catenin, and GAPDH was assessed by Western blotting. |
jgh16040-sup-0015-SI-Figure 14.tiffTIFF image, 914.9 KB |
Figure S14. HuH-R cells were cultured in medium with or without rhIL-8 (50 ng/ml) for 48 h. The IL-6, IL-8, and TNF-α mRNA levels were determined by real-time PCR. ****p<0.0001. |
jgh16040-sup-0016-SI-Figure 15.tiffTIFF image, 906.3 KB |
Figure S15. Effect of knocking down HSF1 and STAT3 expression on IL-8 autocrine signaling. HepG2-R and HuH-R cells were seeded in 60-mm dishes, and then HSF1 and STAT3 expression was knocked down independently or in combination by lentiviral shRNA vectors and cultured for 72 h. The secretion of IL-8 in the medium was detected by ELISA. The experiments were repeated three times. **p<0.01; ***p<0.001. |
jgh16040-sup-0017-SI-Figure 16.tiffTIFF image, 1.9 MB |
Figure S16. Antitumor effect of targeting HSF1 and STAT3 alone or in combination in mice bearing liver cancer xenografts. HepG2-R cells (5×106) were injected subcutaneously into the right upper flanks of the mice. Seven days after the implantation of tumor cells, the mice were assigned to four groups and treated with vehicle, 30 mg/kg KBRBB11, 15 mg/kg Stattic, or 30 mg/kg KBRBB11+15 mg/kg Stattic daily by intraperitoneal (i.p.) injection for nearly 2 wk. All mice were sacrificed. The primary tumors were dissected, photographed (A), and weighed (B). C, Volume of xenograft tumors following treatments. The experiments were repeated three times. *p<0.05; **p<0.01. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- 1Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2018; 68: 394–424.
- 2Anwanwan D, Singh SK, Singh S, Saikam V, Singh R. Challenges in liver cancer and possible treatment approaches. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Rev. Cancer 2020; 1873: 188314.
- 3Visvader JE, Lindeman GJ. Cancer stem cells in solid tumours: accumulating evidence and unresolved questions. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2008; 8: 755–768.
- 4Lee JS, Heo J, Libbrecht L, Chu IS, Kaposi-Novak P, Calvisi DF et al. A novel prognostic subtype of human hepatocellular carcinoma derived from hepatic progenitor cells. Nat. Med. 2006; 12: 410–416.
- 5Dayalan NS, Dinkova-Kostova AT. Regulation of the mammalian heat shock factor 1. FEBS J. 2017; 284: 1606–1627.
- 6Dai C. The heat-shock, or HSF1-mediated proteotoxic stress, response in cancer: from proteomic stability to oncogenesis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 2018; 373.
- 7Chuma M, Sakamoto N, Nakai A, Hige S, Nakanishi M, Natsuizaka M et al. Heat shock factor 1 accelerates hepatocellular carcinoma development by activating nuclear factor-κB/mitogen-activated protein kinase. Carcinogenesis 2014; 35: 272–281.
- 8Fang F, Chang R, Yang L. Heat shock factor 1 promotes invasion and metastasis of hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro and in vivo. Cancer-Am. Cancer Soc. 2012; 118: 1782–1794.
- 9Li S, Ma W, Fei T, Lou Q, Zhang Y, Cui X et al. Upregulation of heat shock factor 1 transcription activity is associated with hepatocellular carcinoma progression. Mol. Med. Rep. 2014; 10: 2313–2321.
- 10Vilaboa NE, Galan A, Troyano A, de Blas E, Aller P. Regulation of multidrug resistance 1 (MDR1)/P-glycoprotein gene expression and activity by heat-shock transcription factor 1 (HSF1). J. Biolumin. Chemilumin. 2000; 275: 24970–24976.
- 11Tchenio T, Havard M, Martinez LA, Dautry F. Heat shock-independent induction of multidrug resistance by heat shock factor 1. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2006; 26: 580–591.
- 12Chou SD, Murshid A, Eguchi T, Gong J, Calderwood SK. HSF1 regulation of β-catenin in mammary cancer cells through control of HuR/elavL1 expression. Oncogene 2015; 34: 2178–2188.
- 13Wang B, Lee CW, Witt A, Thakkar A, Ince TA. Heat shock factor 1 induces cancer stem cell phenotype in breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 2015; 153: 57–66.
- 14Yasuda K, Hirohashi Y, Mariya T, Murai A, Tabuchi Y, Kuroda T et al. Phosphorylation of HSF1 at serine 326 residue is related to the maintenance of gynecologic cancer stem cells through expression of HSP27. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 31540–31553.
- 15Yu H, Pardoll D, Jove R. STATs in cancer inflammation and immunity: a leading role for STAT3. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2009; 9: 798–809.
- 16Johnson DE, O'Keefe RA, Grandis JR. Targeting the IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signalling axis in cancer. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 2018; 15: 234–248.
- 17Jin W. Role of JAK/STAT3 signaling in the regulation of metastasis, the transition of cancer stem cells, and chemoresistance of cancer by epithelial–mesenchymal transition. Cells-Basel 2020; 9.
- 18Ghoshal S, Fuchs BC, Tanabe KK. STAT3 is a key transcriptional regulator of cancer stem cell marker CD133 in HCC. Hepatobiliary Surg. Nutr. 2016; 5: 201–203.
- 19Suzuki A, Raya A, Kawakami Y, Morita M, Matsui T, Nakashima K et al. Nanog binds to Smad1 and blocks bone morphogenetic protein-induced differentiation of embryonic stem cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006; 103: 10294–10299.
- 20Armanious H, Gelebart P, Mackey J, Ma Y, Lai R. STAT3 upregulates the protein expression and transcriptional activity of β-catenin in breast cancer. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Pathol. 2010; 3: 654–664.
- 21Scharenberg CW, Harkey MA, Torok-Storb B. The ABCG2 transporter is an efficient Hoechst 33342 efflux pump and is preferentially expressed by immature human hematopoietic progenitors. Blood 2002; 99: 507–512.
- 22Vasiliou V, Vasiliou K, Nebert DW. Human ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter family. Hum. Genomics 2009; 3: 281–290.
- 23Sun JH, Luo Q, Liu LL, Song GB. Liver cancer stem cell markers: progression and therapeutic implications. World J. Gastroenterol. 2016; 22: 3547–3557.
- 24Castelli G, Pelosi E, Testa U. Liver cancer: molecular characterization, clonal evolution and cancer stem cells. Cancers (Basel) 2017; 9.
- 25Wang Y, He L, Du Y, Zhu P, Huang G, Luo J et al. The long noncoding RNA lncTCF7 promotes self-renewal of human liver cancer stem cells through activation of Wnt signaling. Cell Stem Cell 2015; 16: 413–425.
- 26Zhu P, Wang Y, He L, Huang G, Du Y, Zhang G et al. ZIC2-dependent OCT4 activation drives self-renewal of human liver cancer stem cells. J. Clin. Invest. 2015; 125: 3795–3808.
- 27Jeter CR, Badeaux M, Choy G, Chandra D, Patrawala L, Liu C et al. Functional evidence that the self-renewal gene NANOG regulates human tumor development. Stem Cells 2009; 27: 993–1005.
- 28Tang Y, Kitisin K, Jogunoori W, Li C, Deng CX, Mueller SC et al. Progenitor/stem cells give rise to liver cancer due to aberrant TGF-β and IL-6 signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008; 105: 2445–2450.
- 29De Simone V, Franze E, Ronchetti G, Colantoni A, Fantini MC, Di Fusco D et al. Th17-type cytokines, IL-6 and TNF-α synergistically activate STAT3 and NF-κB to promote colorectal cancer cell growth. Oncogene 2015; 34: 3493–3503.
- 30Ning Y, Cui Y, Li X, Cao X, Chen A, Xu C et al. Co-culture of ovarian cancer stem-like cells with macrophages induced SKOV3 cells stemness via IL-8/STAT3 signaling. Biomed. Pharmacother. 2018; 103: 262–271.
- 31Ding HH, Zhang SB, Lv YY, Ma C, Liu M, Zhang KB et al. TNF-α/STAT3 pathway epigenetically upregulates Nav1.6 expression in DRG and contributes to neuropathic pain induced by L5-VRT. J. Neuroinflammation 2019; 16: 29.
- 32Rokavec M, Wu W, Luo JL. IL6-mediated suppression of miR-200c directs constitutive activation of inflammatory signaling circuit driving transformation and tumorigenesis. Mol. Cell 2012; 45: 777–789.
- 33Singh IS, Gupta A, Nagarsekar A, Cooper Z, Manka C, Hester L et al. Heat shock co-activates interleukin-8 transcription. Am. J. Respir. Cell Mol. Biol. 2008; 39: 235–242.
- 34Ali A, Biswas A, Pal M. HSF1 mediated TNF-α production during proteotoxic stress response pioneers proinflammatory signal in human cells. FASEB J. 2019; 33: 2621–2635.
- 35Singh A, Settleman J. EMT, cancer stem cells and drug resistance: an emerging axis of evil in the war on cancer. Oncogene 2010; 29: 4741–4751.
- 36Khazali AS, Clark AM, Wells A. Inflammatory cytokine IL-8/CXCL8 promotes tumour escape from hepatocyte-induced dormancy. Br. J. Cancer 2018; 118: 566–576.
- 37Zhang H, Yu QL, Meng L, Huang H, Liu H, Zhang N et al. TAZ-regulated expression of IL-8 is involved in chemoresistance of hepatocellular carcinoma cells. Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 2020; 693: 108571.