Feeding of mussel-associated leeches Hemiclepsis kasmiana on bitterling embryos: Novel interaction between parasites in a shared host
Corresponding Author
Daiki Nishino
Graduate School of Environmental Science, The University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Japan
Correspondence
Daiki Nishino, Graduate School of Environmental Science, The University of Shiga Prefecture, 2500 Hassaka-cho, Hikone, Shiga 522-8533, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorTakayoshi Nishida
Graduate School of Environmental Science, The University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKohei Yoshiyama
Graduate School of Environmental Science, The University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Daiki Nishino
Graduate School of Environmental Science, The University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Japan
Correspondence
Daiki Nishino, Graduate School of Environmental Science, The University of Shiga Prefecture, 2500 Hassaka-cho, Hikone, Shiga 522-8533, Japan.
Email: [email protected]
Search for more papers by this authorTakayoshi Nishida
Graduate School of Environmental Science, The University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorKohei Yoshiyama
Graduate School of Environmental Science, The University of Shiga Prefecture, Hikone, Japan
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
We investigated an interaction between bitterlings and a parasitic leech Hemiclepsis kasmiana in freshwater mussel hosts. We found that leeches fed on bitterling eggs and embryos; this may exert a considerable negative effect on bitterling fitness. Host choices by females of three bitterling species may be differently affected by the presence of leeches within mussels; Tanakia limbata apparently avoided laying eggs in infested mussels while T. lanceolata and Acheilognathus rhombeus did not. Our novel findings suggest that relationships between the parasitic leech and the host mussel may be context dependent.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
jfb15510-sup-0001-supinfo.docxWord 2007 document , 17 KB | Appendix S1. Environmental conditions of channels |
jfb15510-sup-0010-supinfo.docxWord 2007 document , 20.2 KB | Appendix S2. Statistical analysis |
jfb15510-sup-0002-TableS1.docxWord 2007 document , 36 KB | Table S1. Numbers of embryos of bitterling Acheilognathus rhombeus and parasitic leeches Hemiclepsis kasmiana obtained from four mussel species, Nodularia nipponensis, Beringiana fukuharai, Pronodularia cf. japanensis 1, and Obovalis omiensis, placed in a ditch located in the University of Shiga Prefecture. Infestation prevalence (%) denotes the ratio of mussels parasitized by leeches, and infestation intensity denotes the number of leeches per parasitized mussel. |
jfb15510-sup-0003-TableS2.docxWord 2007 document , 28.8 KB | Table S2. Bitterling species compositions in drainage channels I, II, and III where the host choice experiments were conducted for Tanakia limbata, for T. lanceolata, and for Acheilognathus rhombeus, respectively. Surveys were made during the night for intervals including the experiment locations by a hand net (mesh size 3 mm; bl-1L, Mitani-Turigyogu, Saitama, Japan). In channels I, II, and III, the lengths of channel intervals were 90, 100, and 100 m, and the amounts of effort were 40, 80, and 20 min, respectively. Note that the efficiencies of catch per unit effort were different between channels due to the bottom substrates and the presence or absence of obstacles, and among seasons due to precipitation and drainage from paddy fields. |
jfb15510-sup-0004-TableS3.docxWord 2007 document , 34.9 KB | Table S3. Numbers of embryos of bitterling Tanakia limbata and paracitic leeches Hemiclepsis kasmiana obtained from three mussel species, Nodularia nipponensis, Beringiana fukuharai, and Pronodularia cf. japanensis 1, of low-density treatment (without additional infestation of leeches) and high-density treatment (with additional infestation of leeches) in an agricultural drainage channel (Nagahama, Japan). Infestation prevalence (%) denotes the ratio of mussels parasitized by leeches, and infestation intensity denotes the number of leeches per parasitized mussel. |
jfb15510-sup-0005-TableS4.docxWord 2007 document , 34.7 KB | Table S4. Numbers of embryos of bitterling Tanakia lanceolata and parasitic leeches Hemiclepsis kasmiana obtained from three mussel species, Nodularia nipponensis, Beringiana fukuharai, and Pronodularia cf. japanensis 1, of low-density treatment (without additional infestation of leeches) and high-density treatment (with additional infestation of leeches) in an agricultural drainage channel (Nagahama, Japan). Infestation prevalence (%) denotes the ratio of mussels parasitized by leeches, and infestation intensity denotes the number of leeches per parasitized mussel. |
jfb15510-sup-0006-TableS5.docxWord 2007 document , 32.1 KB | Table S5. Numbers of embryos of bitterling Acheilognathus rhombeus and parasitic leeches Hemiclepsis kasmiana obtained from a mussel species Nodularia nipponensis of low-density treatment (without additional infestation of leeches) and high-density treatment (with additional infestation of leeches) in an agricultural drainage channel (Maibara, Japan). Infestation prevalence (%) denotes the ratio of mussels parasitized by leeches, and infestation intensity denotes the number of leeches per parasitized mussel. |
jfb15510-sup-0007-TableS6.docxWord 2007 document , 19.3 KB | Table S6. Results of logistic regression for three bittering species, Tanakia limbata, T. lanceolata, and Acheilognathus rhombeus. Log-odds of the probability that eggs were deposited in a mussel were modeled as a linear model of the mussel shell length and the number of parasitic leeches Hemiclepsis kasmiana inhabited the mussel with intercept and coefficients and , respectively. Bayesian inferences were conducted via RStan version 2.21.8 (https://mc-stan.org) on R version 4.2.2 (https://cran.r-project.org) with the settings 4 chains, 1000 iterations, and 500 warmups. |
jfb15510-sup-0008-MovieS1.movQuickTime video, 54.4 MB | Movie S1. A mussel-associated leech that started feeding on an embryo of bitterling Tanakia limbata that was taken from a dissected host mussel Pronodularia cf. japanensis 1. The leech was still normal brown color. |
jfb15510-sup-0009-MovieS2.movQuickTime video, 201.1 MB | Movie S2. The same mussel-associated leech that fed on the same embryo as in Supporting Information Movie S1 after 40 min. Color of the leech turned to yellow. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
REFERENCES
- Amyot, J. P., & Downing, J. A. (1991). Endo-and epibenthic distribution of the unionid mollusc Elliptio complanata. Journal of the North American Benthological Society, 10(3), 280–285.
10.2307/1467601 Google Scholar
- Bashey, F. (2015). Within-host competitive interactions as a mechanism for the maintenance of parasite diversity. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1675), 20140301.
- Bolotov, I. N., Klass, A. L., Kondakov, A. V., Vikhrev, I. V., Bespalaya, Y. V., Filippov, B. Y., Bogan, A. E., Lopes-Lima, M., Lunn, Z., Chan, N., Aksenova, O. V., Dvoryankin, G. A., Chapurina, Y. E., Kim, S. K., Kolosova, Y. S., Konopleva, E. S., Lee, J. H., Makhrov, A. A., Gofarov, M. Y., … Vinarski, M. V. (2019). Freshwater mussels house a diverse mussel-associated leech assemblage. Scientific Reports, 9(1), 16449.
- Bolotov, I. N., Vikhrev, I. V., Aksenova, O. V., Bespalaya, Y. V., Gofarov, M. Y., Kondakov, A. V., & Sokolova, S. E. (2017). Discovery and natural history of the mussel leech Batracobdella kasmiana (Oka, 1910) (Hirudinida: Glossiphoniidae) in Russia. Zootaxa, 4319(2), 386–390.
- Chamberlain, S. A., Bronstein, J. L., & Rudgers, J. A. (2014). How context dependent are species interactions? Ecology Letters, 17(7), 881–890.
- Chang, C. H., Li, F., Shao, K. T., Lin, Y. S., Morosawa, T., Kim, S., Koo, H., Kim, W., Lee, J.-S., He, S., Smith, C., Reichard, M., Miya, M., Sado, T., Uehara, K., Lavoué, S., Chen, W.-J., & Mayden, R. L. (2014). Phylogenetic relationships of Acheilognathidae (Cypriniformes: Cyprinoidea) as revealed from evidence of both nuclear and mitochondrial gene sequence variation: Evidence for necessary taxonomic revision in the family and the identification of cryptic species. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 81, 182–194.
- Fujimoto, Y., Chiba, H., Shindo, K., Kitazima, J., & Iwata, M. (2022). Reproductive ecology and adaptive host choice correlated with body size in an autumn-spawning bitterling Acheilognathus typus. Journal of Fish Biology, 100(5), 1195–1204.
- Hata, H., Uemura, Y., & Ouchi, K. (2021). Decline of unionid mussels enhances hybridisation of native and introduced bitterling fish species through competition for breeding substrate. Freshwater Biology, 66(1), 189–201.
- Holt, R. D., & Polis, G. A. (1997). A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. The American Naturalist, 149(4), 745–764.
- Janssen, A., Sabelis, M. W., Magalhães, S., Montserrat, M., & Van Der Hammen, T. (2007). Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology, 88(11), 2713–2719.
- Kitamura, J. I. (2005). Factors affecting seasonal mortality of rosy bitterling (Rhodeus ocellatus kurumeus) embryos on the gills of their host mussel. Population Ecology, 47(1), 41–51.
- Kitamura, J. I. (2007). Reproductive ecology and host utilization of four sympatric bitterling (Acheilognathinae, Cyprinidae) in a lowland reach of the Harai River in Mie, Japan. Environmental Biology of Fishes, 78, 37–55.
- Matushima, O. (2014). Mechanisms of coexistence of bitterlings. In Y. Nagata (Ed.), Introduction to freshwater fish study (pp. 50–66). Tokai University Press.
- Mideo, N. (2009). Parasite adaptations to within-host competition. Trends in Parasitology, 25(6), 261–268.
- Mills, S. C., & Reynolds, J. D. (2002a). Host species preferences by bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus, spawning in freshwater mussels and consequences for offspring survival. Animal Behaviour, 63(6), 1029–1036.
- Mills, S. C., & Reynolds, J. D. (2002b). Mussel ventilation rates as a proximate cue for host selection by bitterling, Rhodeus sericeus. Oecologia, 131, 473–478.
- Mills, S. C., & Reynolds, J. D. (2003). The bitterling–mussel interaction as a test case for co-evolution. Journal of Fish Biology, 63, 84–104.
- Mills, S. C., Taylor, M. I., & Reynolds, J. D. (2005). Benefits and costs to mussels from ejecting bitterling embryos: A test of the evolutionary equilibrium hypothesis. Animal Behaviour, 70(1), 31–37.
10.1016/j.anbehav.2004.09.016 Google Scholar
- Morand, S. (2015). (macro-) Evolutionary ecology of parasite diversity: From determinants of parasite species richness to host diversification. International Journal for Parasitology: Parasites and Wildlife, 4(1), 80–87.
- Nakamura, M. (1969). Cyprinid fishes of Japan special publications of the research Institute for Natural Resources, 4. Research Institute of Natural Resources.
- Polis, G. A., Myers, C. A., & Holt, R. D. (1989). The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: Potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20(1), 297–330.
10.1146/annurev.es.20.110189.001501 Google Scholar
- Reichard, M., Liu, H., & Smith, C. (2007). The co-evolutionary relationship between bitterling fishes and freshwater mussels: Insights from interspecific comparisons. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 9(2), 239–259.
- Reichard, M., Ondračková, M., Przybylski, M., Liu, H., & Smith, C. (2006). The costs and benefits in an unusual symbiosis: Experimental evidence that bitterling fish (Rhodeus sericeus) are parasites of unionid mussels in Europe. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 19(3), 788–796.
- Reynolds, J. D., Debuse, V. J., & Aldridge, D. C. (1997). Host specialisation in an unusual symbiosis: European bitterlings spawning in freshwater mussels. Oikos, 78, 539–545.
- Rózsa, L., Reiczigel, J., & Majoros, G. (2000). Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts. Journal of Parasitology, 86(2), 228–232.
- Smith, C., Reichard, M., Jurajda, P., & Przybylski, M. (2004). The reproductive ecology of the European bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Journal of Zoology, 262(2), 107–124.
- Smith, C., Reynolds, J. D., Sutherland, W. J., & Jurajda, P. (2000). Adaptive host choice and avoidance of superparasitism in the spawning decisions of bitterling (Rhodeus sericeus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 48, 29–35.
- Yokoyama, T. (2014). Coexistence of Tanakia lanceolata and T. limbata in a stream. In Y. Nagata (Ed.), Introduction to freshwater fish study (pp. 75–85). Tokai University Press.