Volume 33, Issue 1 pp. 7-19
CLINICAL ARTICLE

Composite veneers: The direct–indirect technique revisited

Newton Fahl Jr, DDS, MS

Newton Fahl Jr, DDS, MS

Private Practice, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

Clinical and Scientific Director, Fahl Center, Curitiba, Parana, Brazil

Search for more papers by this author
André V. Ritter DDS, MS, MBA, PhD

Corresponding Author

André V. Ritter DDS, MS, MBA, PhD

Professor and Chair, Department of Cariology and Comprehensive Care, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, New York, USA

Correspondence

Dr André V. Ritter, Professor and Chair, Department of Cariology and Comprehensive Care, New York University College of Dentistry, 354 East 24 Street, Suite 10W, New York, NY 10010.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 18 December 2020
Citations: 29
Based on N Fahl Jr and AV Ritter (eds), Composite Veneers – The Direct–Indirect Technique, 2020 Quintessence Publishing.

Abstract

Objective

This article provides an update on the direct–indirect composite veneer technique.

Clinical considerations

Composite veneers have long been used as a conservative and esthetic treatment option for anterior teeth. While they are generally performed using a direct technique, there has been renewed interest in the direct–indirect composite veneer technique because of its advantages and broad indications for restoration of tooth color and morphology. In the direct–indirect composite veneer technique, the selected composites are initially applied on the tooth using a layering approach, without any bonding agent, sculpted to a primary anatomic form with slight excess, and light-cured. The partially polymerized veneer is then removed from the tooth, heat-tempered, and finished to final anatomy and processed extra-orally before being luted. Advantages of this technique include enhanced physical and mechanical properties afforded by the tempering process, unrivaled marginal adaptation, enhanced finishing and polishing, and the ability to try-in the veneer before luting, enabling a shade verification and modulation process that is not possible with the direct technique. The direct–indirect approach also affords enhanced gingival health and patient comfort.

Conclusion

This article reviews the direct–indirect composite veneer technique, and outlines critical steps and tips for clinical success.

Clinical significance

The direct–indirect technique for composite veneers combines advantages of the direct composite placement technique with those of the indirect veneer technique, including operator control, single-visit fabrication and delivery, increased material properties, and excellent esthetics.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.