Volume 46, Issue 3 pp. 354-362
EPIDEMIOLOGY (COHORT STUDY OR CASE-CONTROL STUDY)

The amount of keratinized mucosa may not influence peri-implant health in compliant patients: A retrospective 5-year analysis

Hyun-Chang Lim

Hyun-Chang Lim

Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Department of Periodontology, Periodontal-Implant Clinical Research Institute, Kyung Hee University School of Dentistry, Seoul, Korea

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel B. Wiedemeier

Daniel B. Wiedemeier

Statistical Services, Center of Dental Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Christoph H. F. Hämmerle

Christoph H. F. Hämmerle

Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel S. Thoma

Corresponding Author

Daniel S. Thoma

Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Correspondence

Daniel S. Thoma, Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 02 February 2019
Citations: 46

Funding information

The study was fully funded by the Clinic of Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science.

Abstract

Aim

(a) To investigate the influence of the keratinized mucosa (KM) on peri-implant health or disease and (b) to identify a threshold value for the width of KM for peri-implant health.

Materials and Methods

The total dataset was subsampled, that is one implant was randomly chosen per patient. In 87 patients, data were extracted at baseline (prosthesis insertion) and 5 years including the width of mid-buccal KM, bleeding on probing, probing depth, plaque index and marginal bone level (MB). Spearman correlations with Holm adjustment for multiple testing were used for potential associations.

Results

Depending on the definition of peri-implant diseases, the prevalence of peri-implantitis ranged from 9.2% (bleeding on probing threshold: <50% or ≥50%) to 24.1% (threshold: absence or the presence). The prevalence of peri-implant mucositis was similar, irrespective of the definition (54%–55.2%). The width of KM and parameters for peri-implant diseases demonstrated negligible (Spearman correlation coefficients: −0.2 < ρ < 0.2). No threshold value was detected for the width of mid-buccal KM in relation to peri-implant health.

Conclusion

The width of KM around dental implants correlated to a negligible extent with parameters for peri-implant diseases. No threshold value for the width of KM to maintain peri-implant health could be identified.

CONFLICTS OF INTEREST

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.