Volume 35, Issue 11 pp. 2202-2210
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Impact of moderate sedation on electrophysiology lab time for left atrial appendage occlusion using 4D-intracardiac echocardiography

Kifah Hussain MD

Corresponding Author

Kifah Hussain MD

McGaw Medical Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Division of Cardiology, Endeavor Health—North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Correspondence Kifah Hussain, MD, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Galter Pavilion, Suite 8632, 675 N St. Clair Chicago, IL 60611, USA.

Email: [email protected]

Search for more papers by this author
Riya Sam MD

Riya Sam MD

Division of Cardiology, Endeavor Health—North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Romil Patel DO

Romil Patel DO

Division of Cardiology, Endeavor Health—North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Nso Nso MD

Nso Nso MD

Division of Cardiology, Endeavor Health—North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Lavisha Singh MPH

Lavisha Singh MPH

Division of Cardiology, Endeavor Health—North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jose Nazari MD

Jose Nazari MD

Division of Cardiology, Endeavor Health—North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jonathan Rosenberg MD

Jonathan Rosenberg MD

Division of Cardiology, Endeavor Health—North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Mark Metzl MD

Mark Metzl MD

Division of Cardiology, Endeavor Health—North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Jeremiah Wasserlauf MD, MS, FHRS

Jeremiah Wasserlauf MD, MS, FHRS

Division of Cardiology, Endeavor Health—North Shore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, USA

University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 25 September 2024

Disclosures: None.

Abstract

Introduction

Left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) can be performed using diverse anesthetic approaches ranging from moderate sedation (MS) to general anesthesia (GA), and guided by intracardiac echocardiography (ICE) or transesophageal echocardiography (TEE). Prior studies have demonstrated shorter time in lab for heart rhythm procedures performed under MS. The objective of this study was to compare laboratory times, acute procedural outcomes and complication rates for LAAO procedures performed using MS and 4-dimensional ICE as opposed to GA.

Methods and Results

This was a retrospective observational cohort study of 135 consecutive patients who were referred for LAAO to be performed with either GA or MS between June 2022 and April 2024. The primary endpoints were total laboratory time, procedure time, nonprocedure time, and fluoroscopy time. The secondary endpoints were stroke, peri-device leak (>5 mm), device-related left atrial thrombus, cardiovascular mortality, and all-cause mortality at 45 days and 6 months postprocedure, where data were available. The mean age of patients in the study was 78.8 ± 7.8 years and 64.4% were male with no difference between GA and MS. In the MS group, 4D-ICE was used for intraprocedural imaging in 95.5% of patients and 2 dimensional-ICE (2D-ICE) was used in 4.5% of patients. In the GA group, intra-procedural imaging was done using TEE in 51.5%, 2D-ICE in 32.4% and 4D-ICE in 16.2% of cases. Total laboratory time was significantly lower in the MS group compared to the GA group (68.3 ± 23.1 vs 117.1 ± 34.3 min; p < 0.001), due to shorter nonprocedure time (15.2 ± 9.1 vs 63.7 ± 22.0 min; p < 0.001), with no significant difference in procedure time and fluoroscopy time. There was no significant difference in complications at 45 days and 6 months postprocedure.

Conclusion

In this single center study, MS reduced total lab time by reducing nonprocedure time when compared to GA for LAAO, without affecting clinical outcomes.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.