Volume 38, Issue 4 e70108
ORIGINAL ARTICLE

Perceptions of Barriers, Facilitators, and Outcomes of Aerobic Exercise in Community Fitness Facilities by Adults With Intellectual Disability

Iva Obrusnikova

Corresponding Author

Iva Obrusnikova

Department of Health Behavior and Nutrition Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA

Correspondence:

Iva Obrusnikova ([email protected])

Search for more papers by this author
Ashley M. Steinbrecher

Ashley M. Steinbrecher

Department of Health Behavior and Nutrition Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Albert R. Cavalier

Albert R. Cavalier

School of Education, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Richard R. Suminski

Richard R. Suminski

Department of Health Behavior and Nutrition Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Cora J. Firkin

Cora J. Firkin

Department of Health Behavior and Nutrition Sciences, University of Delaware, Newark, Delaware, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 July 2025

Funding: This work was supported by the Institutional Development Award (IDeA) from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the NIH (U54 GM104941).

ABSTRACT

Background

Adults with intellectual disability do not meet recommended physical activity (PA) levels, contributing to sedentary lifestyles and health disparities. Community fitness facilities (CFFs) present valuable opportunities for engagement but are often underutilised.

Method

This mixed-methods study, grounded in Social Cognitive Theory, combined semi-structured interviews and quantitative functional assessments to examine the perceived benefits, costs, barriers, and facilitators of aerobic exercise amongst 20 adults with intellectual disability, aged 19–43. Associations between perceptions, PA, and exercise performance were examined.

Results

Participants perceived substantial health benefits from aerobic exercise. However, physical discomfort and environmental constraints were commonly cited and were associated with lower PA levels and performance. Some perceived facilitators were unexpectedly correlated with increased sedentariness and lower functional performance, possibly due to programme design misalignments.

Conclusions

To enhance participation and health outcomes, CFF programmes must be tailored to address individual psychological needs and physical capabilities, whilst also improving accessibility and support.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Data Availability Statement

The data that support the findings of this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy or ethical restrictions.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.