Volume 48, Issue 4 pp. 233-240
Full Access

The Pre-and Posteruptive Effects of Fluoride in the Caries Decline

Eugenio D. Beltran DDS, MPH

Corresponding Author

Eugenio D. Beltran DDS, MPH

Program in Dental Public Health School of Public Health The University of Michigan Ann Arbor. Ml 48109–2029

Send correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Beltran. This study was supported by a contract from the Dental Disease Prevention Activity, Centers for Disease Control, Atlanta, Georgia. Manuscript received: 12/29/87; returned to author for revision: 2/26/88; accepted for publication: 4/20/88.Search for more papers by this author
Brian A. Burt BDS, MPH, PhD

Brian A. Burt BDS, MPH, PhD

Program in Dental Public Health School of Public Health The University of Michigan Ann Arbor. Ml 48109–2029

Search for more papers by this author
First published: December 1988
Citations: 44

Abstract

The widespread availability of fluoride from many sources is accepted as a major reason for the canes decline among children in developed countries. There is still controversy, however, about its principal mode of action. This article reviews the evidence on fluoride's preemptive and posteruptive effects, and suggests reasons for its continuing role in the caries decline. Early fluoridation studies accepted that fluoride acted preeruptively through incorporation into developing enamel; but further research could not explain why fluoride levels were not clearly higher in enamel exposed to fluoride, nor why there were no clear correlations between caries experience and enamel fluoride concentration. Instead, considerable evidence suggests that fluoride acts mainly, though not entirely, through posteruptive remineralization of demineralized enamel. Caries experience has declined in non-fluoridated as well as in fluoridated areas, though DMF scores are still consistently lower in fluoridated areas. Posteruptive remineralization effects are seen from fluoridated drinking water as well as with fluoride from other sources. The continuing caries decline, beyond the level suggested by early fluoridation field trials, can be attributed either to more efficient remineralization or to long-term, intraoral ecological change, or to both.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.