Volume 6, Issue 5 pp. 398-403

N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide as a biomarker of cardioembolic stroke

Ana Catarina Fonseca

Corresponding Author

Ana Catarina Fonseca

Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal

Ana Catarina Fonseca*, Serviço de Neurologia, Hospital de Santa Maria, Avenida Professor Egas Moniz, 1649-035 Lisboa, Portugal.
E-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Joaquim Sampaio Matias

Joaquim Sampaio Matias

Department of Clinical Pathology, Hospital de Santa Maria, Lisboa, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Teresa Pinho e Melo

Teresa Pinho e Melo

Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Filipa Falcão

Filipa Falcão

Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
Patrícia Canhão

Patrícia Canhão

Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
José M. Ferro

José M. Ferro

Department of Neurology, Hospital de Santa Maria, University of Lisbon, Lisboa, Portugal

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 June 2011
Citations: 5

Conflict of interest: None declared.

Abstract

Background and purpose N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide, which is mainly produced by the heart, is increased in acute stroke. We aimed to determine if N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide could be a biomarker for ischemic stroke with a cardioembolic cause.

Methods Consecutive sample of acute stroke patients admitted to a Stroke Unit. Ischemic stroke subtype was classified using the TOAST classification. Blood samples were drawn within 72 h after stroke onset. Serum N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide concentration was measured using an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay. Mean values of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide were compared between patients with hemorrhagic stroke vs. ischemic stroke, cardioembolic stroke vs. noncardioembolic stroke, cardioembolic stroke with atrial fibrillation vs. noncardioembolic stroke using t-test. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to test the ability of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide values to identify cardioembolic stroke and cardioembolic stroke with atrial fibrillation.

Results Ninety-two patients were included (66 with ischemic stroke) with a mean age of 58·6 years. Twenty-eight (42·4%) ischemic strokes had a cardioembolic cause. Mean N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide values for cardioembolic stroke were significantly higher (P<0·001) (491·6; 95% confidence interval 283·7–852·0 pg/ml) than for noncardioembolic ischemic stroke (124·7; 86·3–180·2 pg/ml). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide in cardioembolic stroke was 0·77. The cut-off point with the highest sensitivity and specificity was set at 265·5 pg/ml (71·4% and 73·7% respectively). The area under the curve of N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide for cardioembolic stroke related to atrial fibrillation was 0·92, cut-off was set at 265·5 pg/ml (sensitivity 94·4%, specificity 72·9%).

Conclusion N-terminal probrain natriuretic peptide is a biomarker with a good accuracy to predict ischemic stroke of cardioembolic cause, namely associated with atrial fibrillation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.