Pierson v. Post: A Great Debate, James Kent, and the Project of Building a Learned Law for New York State
Corresponding Author
Angela Fernandez
Faculty of Law, University of Toronto
Angela Fernandez is assistant professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Toronto ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Angela Fernandez
Faculty of Law, University of Toronto
Angela Fernandez is assistant professor at the Faculty of Law, University of Toronto ([email protected]).Search for more papers by this authorEarlier versions of this article were presented at Law and Society in Baltimore, MD (July 2006); the Legal History Group, University of Toronto (March 2006, January 2007); and the Stanford-Yale Junior Faculty Forum in Palo Alto, CA (May 2007). Junior Faculty forum funds were provided by that conference. All other research and travel support came from the University of Toronto; specifically, a Connaught Start-Up Award, SIG grants, and a Summer Student Assistantship Grant, which funded the salary of my research assistant, Alex Zavaglia. Additional funding was provided by the Office of the Dean, Mayo Moran, University of Toronto. Thanks to Helen Weltin, New York State Library, Albany, NY, and Whitney Bagnell, Columbia University, New York. Acknowledgment is also owed to Stephen Waddams, Darlene Johnston, Andrea McDowell, Bethany Berger, Debora Threedy, Robert Gordon, Dirk Hartog, Blaine Baker, Lisa Austin, Denise Réaume, Karen Knop, Michael Marrus, Philip Girard, Donald Roper, Henry Smith, Mark Kelman, and Jed Shugerman.
Abstract
Pierson v. Post (1805) has long puzzled legal teachers and scholars. This article argues that the appellate report was the product of the intellectual interests (and schooling) of the lawyers and judges involved in the case. They converted a minor dispute about a fox into a major argument in order to argue from Roman and other civil law sources on how to establish possession in wild animals, effectively crafting an opportunity to create new law for New York State. This article explores the possibility that the mastermind behind this case was the chief justice of the court at the time, James Kent. The question of Kent's involvement in 1805 remains elusive. However, the article uses annotations he made on his copy of the case and discussion of Pierson v. Post in his famous Commentaries to demonstrate the nature of his later interest and to explore the project of building a learned law for New York State.
REFERENCES
-
Alexander, Gregory S.
1997. Commodity and Propriety: Competing Visions of Property in American Thought, 1776–1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10.7208/chicago/9780226013527.001.0001 Google Scholar
- Baker, G. Blaine. 1985. The Juvenile Advocate Society, 1821 to 1826: Self-Proclaimed Schoolroom for Upper Canada's Governing Class. Historical Papers—Canadian Historical Association 1985: 74–101.
- Bell, D. G. 1988. Paths to the Law in the Maritimes, 1810–1825: The Bliss Brothers and their Circle. Nova Scotia History Review 8: 6–39.
- Berger, Bethany R. 2006. It's Not About the Fox: The Untold History of Pierson v. Post. Duke Law Journal 55: 1089–1143.
- Blackstone, William. 1766. The Rights of Things. Vol. 2, Blackstone's Commentaries on the Law of England. http://avalon.law.yale.edu/18th_century/blackstone_bk2ch1.asp (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Boorstin, Daniel J. 1941. The Mysterious Science of the Law: An Essay on Blackstone's Commentaries, Showing how Blackstone, Employing Eighteenth-Century Ideas of Science, Religion, History, Aesthetics, and Philosophy, Made of the Law of the Law at Once a Conservative and Mysterious Science. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Caines, George. 1806. New York Term Reports: Or Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of that State (1803–1805). Vol. 3. New York: Isaac Riley.
- Caines, George. 1814. New-York Term Reports of Cases Argued and Determined in the Supreme Court of that State, 2nd ed. Vol. 3. New York: Van Winkle and Wiley Printers.
-
Cairns, John W.
1984. Blackstone, an English Institutionist: Legal Literature and the Rise of the Nation State.
Oxford Journal of Legal Studies
4: 318–60.
10.1093/ojls/4.3.318 Google Scholar
- Carrington, Paul D. 1990. Teaching Law and Virtue at Transylvania University: The George Wythe Tradition in the Antebellum Years. Mercer Law Review 41: 673–99.
- Daniel R. Coquillette, ed. 1984. Justinian in Braintree: John Adams, Civilian Learning, and Legal Elitism, 1758–1775. In Law in Colonial Massachusetts, 1630–1800: A conference held 6 and 7 November 1981 by the Colonial Society of Massachusetts, 359–418. Boston: Colonial Society of Massachusetts.
- De Montmorency, J. E. 1913. Robert-Joseph Pothier and French Law. Journal of the Society of Comparative Legislation 13: 265–87.
- Dictionary of American Biography [DAB]. 2008a. “ Cadwallader David Colden.” Prepared by Richard B. Morris. Dictionary of American Biography Base Set. American Council of Learned Societies, 1928–1936. Reproduced in Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale. http://galenet.galegroup.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/servlet/BioRC (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Dictionary of American Biography [DAB]. 2008b. “ James Kent.” Prepared by Frederick Charles Hicks. Dictionary of American Biography Base Set. American Council of Learned Societies, 1928–1936. Reproduced in Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale. http://galenet.galegroup.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/servlet/BioRC (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Dictionary of American Biography [DAB]. 2008c. “ Henry Brockholst Livingston.” Prepared by Robert E. Cushman. Dictionary of American Biography Base Set. American Council of Learned Societies, 1928–1936. Reproduced in Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale. http://galenet.galegroup.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/servlet/BioRC (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Dictionary of American Biography [DAB]. 2008d. “ Nathan Sanford.” Prepared by Edward Conrad Smith. Dictionary of American Biography Base Set. American Council of Learned Societies, 1928–1936. Reproduced in Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale. http://galenet.galegroup.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/servlet/BioRC (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Dictionary of American Biography [DAB]. 2008e. “ Ambrose Spencer.” Prepared by Julian P. Boyd. Dictionary of American Biography Base Set. American Counsel of Learned Societies, 1928–1936. Reproduced in Biography Resource Center. Farmington Hills, MI: Thomson Gale. http://galenet.galegroup.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/servlet/BioRC (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Donahue Jr., Charles. 1986. Animalia Ferae Naturae: Rome, Bologna, Leyden, Oxford, and Queen's County, NY. In Studies in Roman Law: In Memory of A. Arthur Schiller, ed. Roger S. Bagnall and William V. Harris, 39–63. Leiden: E. J. Brill.
- Donahue Jr., Charles, Thomas E. Kauper, and Peter W. Martin. 1993. Occupancy, the Source of “Property”? Pierson v. Post. In Cases and Materials on Property: An Introduction to the Concept and the Institution, 3rd ed., ed. Charles Donahue., 2–7. St. Paul, MN: West.
- Fernandez, Angela. Forthcoming. The Lost Record of Pierson v. Post, the Famous Fox Case. Law and History Review.
- Fernandez, Angela. 2007. Spreading the Word: From the Litchfield Law School to the Harvard Case Method. JSD diss., Yale Law School, New Haven, CT.
- Folts, James D. 1991. “ Duely and Constantly Kept”: A History of the New York Supreme Court, 1691–1847 and an Inventory of Its Records (Albany, Utica, and Geneva Offices, 1797–1847). http://www.courts.state.ny.us/history/pdf/Library/Research/Duely_and_Constantly_Kept.pdf (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Friedman, Lawrence M. 2005. A History of American Law, rev. ed. New York: Touchstone.
- Gentleman of the Bar [Samuel R. Brown]. 1813. The Justices' Directory, Or, Points on Certiorari: Being a Digest of the Cases Reported by Johnson & Caines. http://galenet.galegroup.com.myaccess.library.utoronto.ca/servlet/MOML?af=RN&ae=F105002513&srchtp=a&ste=14 (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Halperin, Jean-Louis. 2006. The French Civil Code. Trans. Tony Weir. New York: University College London Press.
- Hamlin, Paul. 1970. Legal Education in Colonial New York. New York: Da Capo Press.
- Hart, H. L. A. 1956. Blackstone's Use of the Law of Nature. Butterworths South African Law Review 1956: 169–74.
- Hedges, H. P. 1895. Pierson vs. Post. Sag-Harbor Express, October 24, 1.
- Hoeflich, Michael H. 1992. Roman Law in American Legal Culture. Tulane Law Review 66: 1723–43.
- Hoeflich, Michael H. 2002. Translation and Reception of Foreign Law in the Antebellum United States. American Journal of Comparative Law 50: 753–75.
- Hoffman, David. 1846. A Course of Legal Study, Addressed to Students and the Profession Generally. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Thomas, Cowperthwait and Co. Repr., Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein, 1968.
- Horton, John Theodore. 1939. James Kent: A Study in Conservatism, 1763–1847. New York: D. Appleton-Century.
- Hulsebosch, Daniel J. 2005. Constituting Empire: New York and the Transformation of Constitutionalism in the Atlantic World, 1664–1830. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
- Justinian. 1913. The Institutes of Justinian. Institutiones. Trans. John Baron Moyle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Justinian. 1950. Digest 41, 1 & 2. Corpus Juris Civilis. Digesta. Trans. Francis De Zeleuta. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Kelley, Donald R. 1979. Gaius Noster: Substructures of Western Social Thought. American Historical Review 84: 619–48.
- Kennett, Basil. 1703. An Introduction to Pufendorf. In Of the Laws of Nature and Nations: Eight Books. Trans. Basil Kennett, 1–27. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k95829z (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Kent, James. 1826. Commentaries on American Law. Vol 1. New York: O. Halsted. Repr., Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein, 1984.
- Kent, James. 1827. Commentaries on American Law. Vol. 2. New York: O. Halsted. Repr., Buffalo, NY: William S. Hein, 1984.
- Kent, James. 1872. Autobiographical Sketch of Chancellor Kent. Southern Law Review Old Series 1: 381–91.
- Kent, James. 1873. Commentaries on American Law. Vol. 2, 12th ed., ed. O. W. Holmes. Boston: Little, Brown.
- Kent, James. 1898. Memoires and Letters of James Kent, LL.D. Late Chancellor of the State of New York, Author of “Commentaries on American Law,” etc. by his great-grandson William Kent of the New York Bar. Boston: Little, Brown.
-
Kent, James. 1903. Kent's Introductory Lecture.
Columbia Law Review
3: 330–43.
10.2307/1109346 Google Scholar
- Klein, Milton M. 1958. The Rise of the New York Bar: The Legal Career of William Livingston. William and Mary Quarterly 15: 334–58.
- Langbein, John H. 1993. Chancellor Kent and the History of Legal Literature. Columbia Law Review 93: 547–94.
-
Lieberman, David. 1989. The Province of Legislation Determined: Legal Theory in Eighteenth Century Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10.1017/CBO9780511558528 Google Scholar
-
Lucas, Paul. 1963. Ex Parte Sir William Blackstone: “Plagiarist”: A Note on Blackstone and the Natural Law.
American Journal of Legal History
7: 142–58.
10.2307/844252 Google Scholar
- Macdonald, R. St. J. 1987. Maximilien Bibaud, 1823–1887: The Pioneer Teacher of International Law in Canada. Dalhousie Law Journal 11: 721–43.
- Marvin, J. G. 1847. Legal Bibliography Or a Thesaurus of American, English, Irish, and Scotch Law Books, Together with Some Continental Treatises, Interspersed with Critical Observations upon their Various Editions and Authority. Philadelphia: T. and J. W. Johnson, Law Booksellers. Repr., Buffalo, NY: Dennis and Co., 1953.
- McKenna, Marian C. 1986. Tapping Reeve and the Litchfield Law School. Dobbs Ferry, NY: Oceana Publications.
- McDowell, Andrea. 2007. Legal Fictions in Pierson v. Post. Michigan Law Review 105: 735–77.
- Morel, André, and Yvan LaMonde. 2000. Bibaud, François-Maximilien. Vol. 11. Dictionary of Canadian Biography Online. http://www.biographi.ca/EN/ShowBio.asp?BioId=39492&query=bibaud (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Nolan, Dennis R. 1976. Sir William Blackstone and the New American Republic: A Study of Intellectual Impact. New York University Law Review 51: 731–68.
- Parrish, Jenni. 1979. Law Books and Legal Publishing in America, 1760–1840. Law Library Journal 72: 355–452.
- Pothier, Robert-Joseph. 18211824. Oeuvres Complètes de Pothier. 26 vols, ed. Saint-Albin Berville. Paris: Thomine et Fortic. Bibliothèque nationale de France, Catalogue B-N Opale #FRBNF31140148. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/servlet/notices?ID=90353104&idNoeud=1.4&NomAutorite=Oeuvres%2Bcompl%2526%2523232%253Btes%2Bde%2BPothier%252C%2Bnouvelle%2B%2526%2523233%253Bdition%2B%255Bpar%2BSaint-Albin%2BBerville%255D...&host=catalogue (accessed December 21 2008).
- Pothier, Robert-Joseph. 1821. Traités du droit de domaine de propriété, de la possession, de la prescription qui resulte de la possession. Vol. 10, Oeuvres Complètes de Pothier, ed. M. Siffrein. Paris: Chez Chanson, Imprimeur-Libraire. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k24205m (accessed December 21 2008).
- Pothier, Robert-Joseph. 1822. Coutume d'Orleans. Vol. 17, Oeuvres Complètes de Pothier, ed. M. Siffrein. Paris: Chez l'éditeur. http://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/bpt6k24212w (accessed December 21 2008).
- Pufendorf, Samuel. 1749. Law of Nature and Nations: Or, a General System of the Most Important Principles of Morality, Jurisprudence, and Politics. In Eight Books. Written in Latin by the Baron Pufendorf, . . . Done into English by Basil Kennett, . . . To which is prefix'd, M. Barbeyrac's prefactory discourse, . . . Done into English by Mr. Carew, . . . To which are now added, all the large notes of M. Barbeyrac, translated from his fourth and last edition: together with large tables. London: Printed for J. and J. Bonwicke, R. Ware, J. and P. Knapton, S. Birt, T. Longman [and others.
- Robinson, Ira E. 19141915. American Recognition of the Roman or Civil Law. Illinois Law Review 9: 400–09.
- Rogers, Christopher P. 1987. Continental Literature and the Development of the Common Law by the King's Bench: c. 1750–1800. In The Courts and the Development of Commercial Law, ed. Vito Piergiovanni, 161–94. Berlin: Duncker and Humblot.
- Roper, Donald M. 1972. The Elite of the New York Bar as Seen from the Bench: James Kent's Necrologies. New York Historical Society Quarterly 56: 199–237.
- Roper, Donald M. 1980. The New York Supreme Court and Economic Development, 1798–1823. In Working Papers from the Regional Economic History Research Center; Law and Economic Development: Papers from the Fall 1979 Regional Economic History Conference, eds. Glenn Porter and William H. Mullligan., 3(3): 58–89. Wilmington, DE: Greenville
- Roper, Donald M. 2000. “ Daniel D. Tompkins. American National Biography Online. Feb. 2000. American Council of Learned Societies. Oxford University Press. http://www/anb.org/articles/03/03-00494.html (accessed December 21, 2008).
- Simpson, A. W. B. 1981. The Rise and Fall of the Legal Treatise: Legal Principles and the Forms of Legal Literature. University of Chicago Law Review 48: 632–79.
- Simpson, A. W. B. 1995. The Timeless Principles of the Common Law: Keeble v. Hickeringill (1707). In Leading Cases in the Common Law, ed. A. W. B. Simpson, 45–75. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
- Skemer, Don C. 1978. The Institutio legalis and Legal Education in New Jersey: 1783–1817. New Jersey History (Autumn-Winter): 123–34.
- Sowerby, Emily Millicent. 1953. Philosophy. Vol. 2, Catalogue of Thomas Jefferson. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
- Tocqueville, Alexis de. 1990. Democracy in America. Vol. 1. New York: Vintage Books.
- Watson, Alan. 1993. Chancellor Kent's Use of Foreign Law. In The Reception of Continental Ideas in the Common Law World, 1820–1920, ed. Mathias Reimann, 45–62. Berlin: Duncker and Humbolt.
- Watson, Alan. 1996. Introduction to Law for Second-Year Students? Journal of Legal Education 46: 430–44.
- Wenig, Mary Moers. 1990. The Marital Property Law of Connecticut: Past, Present and Future. Wisconsin Law Review 1990: 807–79.
CASES
- Bebee v. Bank of New York, 1 Johns. 529 (NY Ct. Err. 1806).
- Brandt v. Ogden, 3 Cai. R. 6 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Cheviot v. Brooks, 1 Johns. 365 (NY Sup. Ct. 1806).
- Codwife and Ludlow v. Hacker, Cole & Cas, Cai. R. 401 (NY Sup. Ct., 1804).
- Colden v. Thurbur, 2 Johns. 424 (NY Sup. Ct. 1807).
- Curtis v. Groat, 6 Johns. 168, 170 (N. Sup. Ct. 1810).
- Delevan v. Baldwin, 3 Cai. R. 104 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Dennis v. Cummins, 3 Johns. 297 (NY Sup. St. 1803).
- Dewitt v. Schoonmaker, 2 Johns. 243 (NY Sup. Ct. 1807).
- Ferris v. Coles, 3 Cai.R. 207 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Frith v. Baker, 2 Johns. 327 (NY Sup. Ct. 1807).
- Griswold v. Waddington, 16 Johns. 438 (NY 1818).
- Hall v. Shultz & Shultz, 4 Johns. 240 (NY Sup. Ct. 1809).
- Henshaw v. M. I. Co., 2 Cai. R. 274 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Hinckley v. Boardman, 3 Cai. R. 134 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Jackson v. Chase, 2 Johns. 84 (NY Sup. Ct. 1806).
- Jackson v. Shepard, 2 Johns. 78 (NY Sup. Ct. 1806).
- Jackson v. Vredenbergh, 1 Johns. 159 (NY Sup. Ct., 1806).
- Keeler v. Adams, 3 Cai. R. 84 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Lawrence v. Sebor, 2 Cai. R. 203 (NY Sup. Ct. 1804).
- Leavenworth v. Delafield, 1 Cai. R. 573 (NY Sup. Ct. 1804).
- Ludlow v. Bowne and Eddy, 1 Johns. 1 (NY Sup. Ct. 1806).
- Newkerk and others v. Newkerk and others, 2 Cai. R. 345 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Palmer v. Mulligan, 3 Cai. R. 307 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Peck v. The Trustees of Randall, 1 Johns. 165 (NY Sup. Ct. 1806).
- Pelton v. Ward, 3 Cai. R. 73 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Penny and Scribner v. The NY Ins. Co., 3 Cai. R. 155 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- The People v. Barrett and Ward, 1 Johns. 66 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1806).
- Pierson v. Post, 3 Cai. R. 175 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Post and La Rue v. Neafie, 3 Cai. R. 22 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Potter v. Lansing, 1 Johns. 215 (NY Sup. Ct. 1806).
- Robert v. Garnie, 3 Cai. R. 14 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Robinson v. N.Y. Ins. Co., 2 Cai. R. 357 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Ruan v. Perry, 3 Cai. R. 120 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Sands v. Codwise, 2 Johns. 485 (NY Ct. Errors 1807).
- Schoonmaker v. Trans., 2 Cai. R. 110 (NY Sup. Ct. 1804).
- Schuyler v. Van Der Veer, 2 Cai. R. 235 (NY Sup. Ct. 1804).
- Shadwick v. Phillips, 3 Cai. R. 129 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Smith and Delamater v. Richardson, 3 Cai. R. 219 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Tom v. Goodrich, 2 Johns. 213 (NY Sup. Ct. 1807).
- The United Ins. Co. of NY v. Robinson and Hartshorne, 2 Cai. R. 280 (NY Sup. Ct. 1805).
- Van Bramer v. Cooper, 2 Johns. 279 (NY Sup. Ct. 1807).
- Vrooman v. Phelps, 2 Johns. 177 (NY Sup. Ct. 1807).
- Ward v. Clark, 2 Johns. 10 (NY Sup. Ct. 1806).
ARCHIVAL DOCUMENTS
- The Papers of James Kent, 1799–1808, Library of Congress, Washington, DC.[Letter A]. James Kent to Elizabeth Kent. May 7, 1805. Reel 2. Vol. 3.[Letter B]. Elizabeth Kent to James Kent. May 11, 1805. Reel 2. Vol. 3.[List of Books Read]. 1805. Reel 2. Vol. 3.
- Kent Family Papers, Diaries and Notebooks, 1842–1843, Columbia University, New York, Butler Rare Book and Manuscript Library. Catalogue of his Library. Vol. 8.