Volume 29, Issue 6 pp. 745-751

Evidence for major pleiotropic effects on bone size variation from a principal component analysis of 451 Caucasian families1

Li-jun TAN

Li-jun TAN

Laboratory of Molecular and Statistical Genetics and the Key Laboratory of Protein Chemistry and Developmental Biology of Ministry of Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Search for more papers by this author
Yao-zhong LIU

Yao-zhong LIU

Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Basic Medical Sciences, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2792, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Peng XIAO

Peng XIAO

Osteoporosis Research Center, Creighton University Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Fang YANG

Fang YANG

Laboratory of Molecular and Statistical Genetics and the Key Laboratory of Protein Chemistry and Developmental Biology of Ministry of Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Search for more papers by this author
Zi-hui TANG

Zi-hui TANG

Laboratory of Molecular and Statistical Genetics and the Key Laboratory of Protein Chemistry and Developmental Biology of Ministry of Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Search for more papers by this author
Peng-yuan LIU

Peng-yuan LIU

Osteoporosis Research Center, Creighton University Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Robert R RECKER

Robert R RECKER

Osteoporosis Research Center, Creighton University Medical Center Omaha, Nebraska 68131, USA

Search for more papers by this author
Hong-wen DENG

Corresponding Author

Hong-wen DENG

Laboratory of Molecular and Statistical Genetics and the Key Laboratory of Protein Chemistry and Developmental Biology of Ministry of Education, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China

Institute of Molecular Genetics and the Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering of Ministry of Education, Xi'an Jiao Tong University, Xi'an 710049, China

Departments of Orthopedic Surgery and Basic Medical Sciences, University of Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri 64108-2792, USA

Correspondence to Prof Hong-wen DENG. Phn/Fax 86-731-887-2791. E-mail [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
1

The study was partially supported by grants from NIH (K01 AR02 170-01, R01 AR45349-01, and R01 GM60402-01 A1), and also benefited from grants from the National Science Foundation of China (No 30230210, 30470534, and 30600364) and a Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (No 05B037).

Abstract

Aim: To identify pleiotropic quantitative trait loci (QTL) influencing bone size (BS) at different skeletal sites in Caucasians. Methods: In a sample containing 3899 Caucasians from 451 pedigrees, 410 microsatellite markers spaced ∼8.9 cM apart across the human genome were genotyped. Phenotypical and genetic correlations of BS at lumbar spine, hip (femoral neck, trochanter, and intertrochanter regions), and wrist (ultradistal, mid-distal, and one-third distal sites) were determined using bivariate quantitative genetic analysis. A principal component analysis (PCA) was performed to obtain principal component (PC) factors that were then subjected to variance components linkage analysis to identify regions linked to the PC. Results: Genetic correlations of BS at different skeletal sites ranged fr om 0.40 to 0.7 9 (P<0.001). The PCA yielded a PC named PCtotal, which explained up to 76% of the total (co)variation of all the BS at the 7 skeletal sites for the whole sample. We identified a QTL influencing the BS of multiple skeletal sites on chromosome 7 at 140 cM [logarithm of odds (LOD)=2.85] in the overall sample. Sex-specific evidence for linkage was observed on chromosome 11 at 53 cM (LOD =2.82) in the male-only data subset. Conclusion: Our study identified several genomic regions that may have pleiotropic effects on different skeletal sites. These regions may contain genes that play a critical role in overall bone development and osteoporosis at multiple skeletal sites, hence are biologically and clinically important.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.