Volume 11, Issue 1 pp. 11-23

Marginal Bone Loss at Implants: A Retrospective, Long-Term Follow-Up of Turned Brånemark System® Implants

Solweig Sundén Pikner DDS, Odont Lic

Solweig Sundén Pikner DDS, Odont Lic

Department of Oral Radiology, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Örebro, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
Kerstin Gröndahl DDS, Odont Dr

Kerstin Gröndahl DDS, Odont Dr

Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
Torsten Jemt DDS, Odont Dr

Torsten Jemt DDS, Odont Dr

Department of Prosthetic Dentistry/Dental Material Science, Institute of Odontology, The Sahlgrenska Academy at Göteborg University, Göteborg, Sweden;

Search for more papers by this author
Bertil Friberg DDS, Odont Dr

Bertil Friberg DDS, Odont Dr

The Brånemark Clinic, Public Dental Health Service, Göteborg, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 09 February 2009
Citations: 52
Dr. Solweig Sundén Pikner, Department of Oral Radiology, Postgraduate Dental Education Center, Box 1126, SE-701 11 Örebro, Sweden; e-mail: [email protected]

ABSTRACT

Background: Lately, presence of progressive bone loss around oral implants has been discussed.

Purpose: The aim of this study was to report in a large patient group with different prosthetic restorations marginal bone level and its change as measured in radiographs obtained from prosthesis insertion up to a maximum 20 years in service. Further, it also aimed to study the impact of gender, age, jaw, prosthetic restoration, and calendar year of surgery.

Materials and Methods: Out of 1,716 patients recorded for clinical examination during 1999, 1,346 patients (78.4%) could be identified. A total of 640 patients (3,462 originally installed Brånemark System® implants, Nobel Biocare, Göteborg, Sweden) with a follow-up of ≥5 years were included in the study, while patients with continuous overdentures and augmentation procedures were not. Distance between the fixture/abutment junction (FAJ) and the marginal bone level was recorded.

Results: The number of implants with a mean bone level of ≥3 mm below FAJ increased from 2.8% at prosthesis insertion to 5.6% at year 1, and 10.8% after 5 years. Corresponding values after 10, 15, and 20 years were 15.2, 17.2, and 23.5%, respectively. Implant-based bone loss was as a mean 0.8 mm (SD 0.8) after 5 years, followed by only minor average changes. Mean bone loss on patient level followed a similar pattern. Disregarding follow-up time, altogether 183 implants (107 patients) showed a bone loss ≥3 mm from prosthesis insertion to last examination. Significantly larger bone loss was found the older the patient was at surgery and for lower jaw implants.

Conclusions: Marginal bone support at Brånemark implants was with few exceptions stable over years.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.