Volume 96, Issue 7 pp. 1071-1075
REGULAR ARTICLE

Breastfeeding outcomes for mothers with and without home access to e-technologies

Laurent Laborde

Laurent Laborde

Quality of Care Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, France

Search for more papers by this author
Nathalie Gelbert-Baudino

Nathalie Gelbert-Baudino

Association Française de Pédiatrie Ambulatoire, Groupe Allaitement, Chambéry, France

Search for more papers by this author
Julie Fulcheri

Julie Fulcheri

Maternity Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, France

Search for more papers by this author
Camille Schelstraete

Camille Schelstraete

General Practitioner, Chambery, France

Search for more papers by this author
Patrice Francois

Patrice Francois

Quality of Care Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, France

Pediatrics department, Grenoble University Hospital, France

Search for more papers by this author
Jose Labarere

Jose Labarere

Quality of Care Unit, Grenoble University Hospital, France

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 June 2007
Citations: 7
Correspondence
Jose Labarere, Unité d'Evaluation Médicale, Pavillon Taillefer, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire BP 217, 38 043 Grenoble Cedex 9, France. Tel: (+33) 4 76 76 87 67 | Fax: (+33) 4 76 76 88 31 | Email: [email protected]

Abstract

Aim: To estimate the percentage of breastfeeding mothers with home access to e-technologies and to compare breastfeeding outcomes for mothers with and without access to e-technologies.

Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of 550 breastfeeding mothers discharged from nine maternity units in France.

Results: Overall, 435 mothers (79%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 75–82) had home access to e-technologies. Mothers with access to e-technologies were less likely to be unemployed (6% vs. 15%, p = 0.004), to smoke during pregnancy (8% vs. 16%, p = 0.03), to have a breastfeeding assessment score <8 (39% vs. 59%, p < 0.001) and to use a pacifier (23% vs. 41%, p < 0.001). Although mothers with access to e-technologies had a longer median breastfeeding duration than those without home access to e-technologies (19 vs. 16 weeks, p = 0.02), adjusted hazard ratios for breastfeeding discontinuation (0.85; 95% CI, 0.60–1.21), overall satisfaction rates (73% vs. 67%, p = 0.19) and breastfeeding difficulties after discharge (58% vs. 61%, p = 0.60) were not different for the two groups.

Conclusion: A vast majority of breastfeeding mothers have home access to e-technologies in France. However, access to e-technologies was not independently associated with better breastfeeding outcomes in this study.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.