Volume 37, Issue 1 pp. 1-6

Analyses of HLA-DQ Alleles in Recurrent Spontaneous Abortion (RSA) Couples

Dawn R. Wagenknecht

Dawn R. Wagenknecht

Center for Reproduction and Transplantation Immunology, Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana

Search for more papers by this author
Karen M. Green

Karen M. Green

Center for Reproduction and Transplantation Immunology, Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana

Search for more papers by this author
John A. McIntyre PhD, FRC Path, dip. ABHI

Corresponding Author

John A. McIntyre PhD, FRC Path, dip. ABHI

Center for Reproduction and Transplantation Immunology, Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Indianapolis, Indiana

Methodist Hospital of Indiana, Center for Reproduction and Transplantation Immunology, 1701 N. Senate Blvd, Indianapolis, Indiana 46202.Search for more papers by this author
First published: 06 September 2011
Citations: 10

Abstract

PROBLEM: The influence of HLA sharing on pregnancy outcome is controversial. In renal transplantation, HLA-DQB1 donor-recipient mismatches have been shown beneficial for long-term transplant success. Since pregnancy is defined as Nature's allograft, we investigated the relevance of HLA-DQ mismatching in normal reproducing couples compared to couples experiencing RSA.

METHOD: Unexplained RSA couples referred to our laboratory for immunological testing were classified by immunological findings and obstetrical history. Primary RSA couples shared ≥ 2 HLA-A, B, or DR antigens, had no cytotoxic anti-paternal antibodies, and no gestation beyond 20 weeks. Secondary RSA couples had cytotoxic anti-paternal antibodies and RSA after a live birth. HLA-DQA1 and DQB1 alleles were identified by PCR-SSP.

RESULTS: No differences in DQA1 and DQB1 mismatch were observed among RSA patients and controls. DQA1-DQB1 haplotype mismatches were not different among the three groups of couples.

CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to renal transplant, HLA-DQ incompatibility did not differ among RSA couples compared with successful reproducing couples.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.