Volume 18, Issue 1 pp. 125-132

The linear excisional wound: an improved model for human ex vivo wound epithelialization studies

Amilcar Ezequiel Rizzo

Amilcar Ezequiel Rizzo

Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA

Search for more papers by this author
Laurel A. Beckett

Laurel A. Beckett

Department of Public Health Sciences, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA

The Division of Biostatistics, University of California, Davis, School of Medicine, Davis, CA

Search for more papers by this author
Brian S. Baier

Brian S. Baier

Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA

Search for more papers by this author
R. Rivkah Isseroff

R. Rivkah Isseroff

Department of Dermatology, School of Medicine, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA

The Dermatology and Wound Services, Department of Veterans Affairs, Northern California Health Care System, Mather, CA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 24 May 2011
Citations: 18
Address:
R. Rivkah Isseroff
Department of Dermatology
School of Medicine
Dermatology Research, TB192
University of California, Davis
One Shields Ave
Davis
CA 95616, USA
Tel: +530 752 8155
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background/purpose: Wound healing is a complex process that involves multiple intercellular and intracellular processes and extracellular interactions. Explanted human skin has been used as a model for the re-epithelialization phase of human wound healing. The currently used standard technique uses a circular punch biopsy tool to make the initial wound. Despite its wide use, the geometry of round wounds makes it difficult to measure them reliably.

Methods: Our group has designed a linear wounding tool, and compared the variability in ex vivo human linear and circular wounds.

Results: An F test for differences in variances demonstrated that the linear wounds provided a population of wound size measurements that was 50% less variable than that obtained from a group of matched circular wounds. This reduction in variability would provide substantial advantages for the linear wound technique over the circular wound punch technique, by reducing the sample sizes required for comparative studies of factors that alter healing.

Conclusion: This linear wounding tool thus provides a method for wounding that is standardized, provides minimal error in wound gap measurements, and is easily reproducible. We demonstrate its utility in an ex vivo model for the controlled investigation of human skin wounds.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.