Volume 42, Issue 1 pp. 95-98

Analysis of giant cell tumour of bone cells for Noonan syndrome/Cherubism-related mutations

Linda Moskovszky

Linda Moskovszky

Semmelweis University 1st Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Budapest, Hungary

Search for more papers by this author
Bernadine Idowu

Bernadine Idowu

Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK

Histopathology Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Richard Taylor

Richard Taylor

Department of Pathology, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Fredrik Mertens

Fredrik Mertens

Department of Clinical Genetics, Lund University Hospital, Lund, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Nicholas Athanasou

Nicholas Athanasou

Department of Pathology, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford, UK

Search for more papers by this author
Adrienne Flanagan

Adrienne Flanagan

Institute of Orthopaedics and Musculoskeletal Science, University College London, Stanmore, Middlesex, UK

Histopathology Department, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Trust, Stanmore, UK

Cancer Institute, University College Hospital, London, UK

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 22 June 2012
Citations: 7
Nicholas Athanasou, Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Department of Pathology, Nuffield Orthopaedic Centre, Oxford OX 7LD, UK. Tel: +44 1865 (7) 38136, Fax: +44 1865 (7) 38140, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Background: Giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB) is an osteolytic tumour which contains numerous osteoclast-like giant cells and a proliferation of mononuclear stromal cells (MSC). Giant cell-rich osteolytic lesions can also develop in the jaw bones in Noonan syndrome, a cherubism-like developmental abnormality that is transmitted in an autosomal dominant fashion, often because of mutation in the PTPN11 or BRAF genes.

Methods: We screened GCTBs for mutations in PTPN11 and BRAF to determine whether GCTBs develop through alterations of genes involved in Noonan syndrome. MSC were isolated from 10 GCTBs.

Results: Chromosome banding analysis of these cells revealed telomeric associations (tas) in 7 of the 10 cases. Thus, the cultured cells expressed a cytogenetic abnormality typically found in short-term cultures from GCTBs. Sequencing of DNA extracted from the seven GCTB-derived MSC cultures displaying tas did not identify any mutation in PTPN11 or in exons 9–15 of BRAF.

Conclusion: Our findings indicate that the molecular pathways involved in GCTB development are different from those causing Noonan syndrome. The method for isolating and culturing GCTB stromal cells described in this study generated a population of MSC that contained tas, indicating that it is useful for obtaining stromal cells from GCTB and other giant cell-rich lesions, such as giant cell reparative granuloma, for genetic and other studies.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.