Volume 11, Issue 4 pp. 248-252
Full Access

Incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in patients with ascites. Diagnostic value of white blood cell count and pH measurement in ascitic fluid

John Skaaning Storgaard

Corresponding Author

John Skaaning Storgaard

Department of Hepatology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen and Department of Diagnostic Bacteriology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark

Dept. of Medicine Section of Hepatology 259 Hvidovre Hospital DK-2650 Hvidovre DenmarkSearch for more papers by this author
Jesper Hastrup Svendsen

Jesper Hastrup Svendsen

Department of Hepatology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen and Department of Diagnostic Bacteriology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Jens Hegnhøj

Jens Hegnhøj

Department of Hepatology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen and Department of Diagnostic Bacteriology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Jens Jacob Krintel

Jens Jacob Krintel

Department of Hepatology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen and Department of Diagnostic Bacteriology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
Peder Bo Nielsen

Peder Bo Nielsen

Department of Hepatology, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen and Department of Diagnostic Bacteriology, Statens Seruminstitut, Copenhagen, Denmark

Search for more papers by this author
First published: August 1991
Citations: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT— During a 21-month period, 65 consecutive patients admitted with ascites were included in a prospective study of the incidence of spontaneous bacterial peritonitis, and paracentesis was performed on admission. The ascitic fluid was cultured, ascitic leucocytes were counted and pH was measured. Bacterial growth was found in five patients with chronic liver disease, who were diagnosed as having spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP), since no intra-abdominal focus could be demonstrated. Thus, the incidence of SBP in this material was 7.7% (95% confidence limits: 2.5–17%). SBP was caused by Escherichia coli (n = 3), coagulase negative staphylococcus (n = 1), and Bacteroides species (n = 1). Abdominal tenderness, abnormal intestinal sounds, fever and hepatic encephalopathy were equally frequent in the group with SBP and in patients with sterile ascites. Infection was not anticipated in any of the patients with SBP. In contrast to several previous studies, neither ascites pH nor ascites leucocyte counts were any help in obtaining a rapid diagnosis. Survival time of patients with SBP was significantly shorter than of patients without SBP.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.