Volume 20, Issue 7 pp. 660-666

A randomized-controlled clinical trial evaluating clinical and radiological outcomes after 3 and 5 years of dental implants placed in bone regenerated by means of GBR techniques with or without the addition of BMP-2

Ronald E. Jung

Ronald E. Jung

Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Simone I. Windisch

Simone I. Windisch

Private practice, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Ariane M. Eggenschwiler

Ariane M. Eggenschwiler

Private practice, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Daniel S. Thoma

Daniel S. Thoma

Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Franz E. Weber

Franz E. Weber

Department of Cranio-Maxillofacial Surgery, Bioengeneering, University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Christoph H. F. Hämmerle

Christoph H. F. Hämmerle

Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 04 June 2009
Citations: 105
Correspondence to:
Dr Ronald E. Jung
Clinic for Fixed and Removable Prosthodontics and Dental Material Science
University of Zurich
Plattenstrasse 11
CH-8032 Zurich
Switzerland
Tel.: +41 44 634 32 51
Fax: +41 44 634 43 05
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective: The aim of this randomized-controlled clinical trial was to evaluate the long-term outcome of implants placed in bone augmented with a xenogenic bone substitute material and a collagen membrane with or without the addition of recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2 (rhBMP-2).

Material and methods: Eleven patients received a total of 34 implants placed into sites exhibiting lateral bone defects. In a split mouth design, the defects were randomly treated with the graft material and the collagen membrane either with (test) or without (control) rhBMP-2. The patients were examined 3 and 5 years after insertion of the prosthetic restoration. Student's paired t-test was performed to detect differences between the two groups.

Results: The survival rate at 3 and 5 years was 100% for both groups. The peri-implant soft tissues were stable and healthy without any difference between the two groups. The prosthetic reevaluation demonstrated four loose prosthetic screws during the first 3 years and seven ceramic chippings after 3 and 5 years. The mean distance between the first bone to implant contact to implant abutment junction at 3 years was 1.37 mm (test), 1.22 mm (control), and 1.38 mm (test), and 1.23 mm (control) at 5 years. The difference of <0.2 mm between test and control implants was not statistically significant. The mean change of the marginal bone level between baseline and 5 years ranged from −0.07 mm (mesial, test), −0.11 mm (distal, test), −0.03 mm (mesial, control), to +0.13 mm (distal, control). No statistically significant differences were observed between test and control sites.

Conclusion: Implants placed in bone augmented with and without rhBMP-2 revealed excellent clinical and radiological outcomes after 3 and 5 years.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.