Volume 17, Issue 6 pp. 679-686

Osteotome sinus floor elevation without grafting material: a 1-year prospective pilot study with ITI implants

Rabah Nedir

Rabah Nedir

Swiss Dental Clinics Group, CdR Clinique de Soins Dentaires, Vevey, Switzerland

Department of Stomatology and Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Mark Bischof

Mark Bischof

Swiss Dental Clinics Group, CdR Clinique de Soins Dentaires, Vevey, Switzerland

Department of Stomatology and Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Lydia Vazquez

Lydia Vazquez

Department of Stomatology and Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Serge Szmukler-Moncler

Serge Szmukler-Moncler

Swiss Dental Clinics Group, CdR Clinique de Soins Dentaires, Vevey, Switzerland

Department of Stomatology and Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
Jean-Pierre Bernard

Jean-Pierre Bernard

Department of Stomatology and Oral Surgery, School of Dental Medicine, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 31 August 2006
Citations: 104
Correspondence to:
Dr Rabah Nedir
Swiss Dental Clinics Group
CdR, Clinique de Soins Dentaires
Rue du Collège 3
1800 Vevey
Switzerland
Tel.: +41 21 923 52 31
Fax: +41 21 922 22 98
e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective: The aim of the present pilot study was to evaluate: (1) the predictability of an osteotome sinus floor elevation procedure with ITI-SLA implants without placing a bone grafting material, and (2) the possibility to gain bone height without filling the created space with a bone grafting material.

Material and methods: Seventeen patients received 25 implants protruding in the sinus. Most implants (21/25) were 10 mm long, eight were inserted in type 2 bone, 12 in type 3 and five in type 4 bone. At implant placement, the mean residual bone height (RBH) under the maxillary sinus was 5.4±2.3 mm; it was 5.7±2.6 mm on the mesial side and 5.1±1.9 mm on the distal side. Nineteen implants had less than 6 mm of bone on at least one side and six implants had less than 6 mm on both sides. A healing period of 3–4 months was allowed before abutment tightening at 35 Ncm. The percentage of stable implants at abutment tightening and at the 1-year control was calculated. The endo-sinus bone gain and the crestal bone loss (CBL) at the mesial and distal sides were measured.

Results: Abutments were tightened after 3.1±0.4 months. All implants but one (96%) resisted the applied 35 Ncm torque. At the 1-year control, all implants were clinically stable and supported the definitive prosthesis. All showed endo-sinus bone gain; the mean gain was 2.5±1.2 mm. The mean CBL was 1.2±0.7 mm. Endo-sinus bone gain and RBH showed a strong negative correlation (r=−0.78 on the mesial side and −0.80 on the distal side). A good correlation (r=0.73) was found between implant penetration in the sinus and endo-sinus bone gain.

Conclusion: Elevation of the sinus membrane alone without addition of bone grafting material can lead to bone formation beyond the original limits of the sinus floor. Despite a limited RBH at implant placement, a healing period of 3 months was sufficient to resist a torque of 35 N cm and to lead to a predictable implant function at the 1-year control.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.