Volume 73, Issue 3 pp. 216-221
Full Access

Primary argon laser trabeculoplasty vs pilocarpine

IV. Long-term effects on optic nerve head

Bengt Bergeå

Corresponding Author

Bengt Bergeå

Läkargruppen in Örebro, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Bengt Bergeå Läkargruppen i Örebro, Box 344 S-70146 Örebro, Sweden.Search for more papers by this author
Lennart Bodin

Lennart Bodin

Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Björn Svedbergh

Björn Svedbergh

Örebro Medical Center Hospital, Örebro and Department of Ophthalmology, the Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: June 1995
Citations: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT In a prospective, randomized study on primary argon laser trabeculoplasty vs piloparpine in 82 newly detected open-angle glaucomas the progress of optic nerve head damage is presented. In 70 patients reliable stereo photographs could be analysed. In the laser treated group a progression of glaucoma damage after 24 months was seen in 6/37 eyes (16%) and in the pilocarpine-treated group 16/33 (49%) (p = 0.0048). There was a statistically significant favourable outcome if intraocular presssure was regulated in terms of peak and range of pressure, but not average pressure. This was even more pronounced in capsular glaucoma, but not significant for simple glaucoma. Pilocarpine increased the risk for further damage to the optic nerve head 6.4 times compared to laser trabeculoplasty. Thus, laser is recommended as the primary therapy in high tension glaucoma, especially in capsular glaucoma.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.