Volume 73, Issue 3 pp. 207-215
Full Access

Primary argon laser trabeculoplasty vs pilocarpine

III. Long-term effects on visual fields

Bengt Bergeå

Corresponding Author

Bengt Bergeå

Läkargruppen in Örebro, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Department of Ophthalmology Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Läkargruppen i Örebro Box 344 S-70146 Örebro Sweden.Search for more papers by this author
Lennart Bodin

Lennart Bodin

Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
Björn Svedbergh

Björn Svedbergh

Örebro Medical Center Hospital, Örebro and Department of Ophthalmology, Academic Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden

Search for more papers by this author
First published: June 1995
Citations: 10

Abstract

ABSTRACT In a prospective randomized study on primary argon laser trabeculoplasty vs piloparpine in 82 newly detected open-angle glaucoma patients, visual field changes were analysed for absolute changes over 2 years on automated threshold perimetry and manual Goldmann perimetry. Regression analysis was also performed using the threshold perimetry examinations taken every second month. Analyses based on automatic perimetry were corrected for eventual bias due to cataract and induced miosis. There was significantly less decay of visual field in the group treated with laser. This was even more pronounced for eyes with capsular glaucoma, especially in the early stage. For the smaller group with simple glaucoma no significant advantage of laser could be shown. Successful intraocular pressure reduction significantly improved the visual field outcome. Laser trabeculoplasty is therefore recommended as primary therapy in capsular glaucoma.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.