Ecological inference on bacterial succession using curve-based community fingerprint data analysis, demonstrated with rhizoremediation experiment
Corresponding Author
Anu Mikkonen
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Correspondence: Anu Mikkonen, Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, Division of Microbiology, Viikinkaari 9, PO Box 56, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Tel.: + 358 9191 59281; fax: + 358 9191 59322; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorKaisa Lappi
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorKaisa Wallenius
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorKristina Lindström
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorLeena Suominen
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorCorresponding Author
Anu Mikkonen
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Correspondence: Anu Mikkonen, Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, Division of Microbiology, Viikinkaari 9, PO Box 56, FIN-00014 University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland. Tel.: + 358 9191 59281; fax: + 358 9191 59322; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this authorKaisa Lappi
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorKaisa Wallenius
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorKristina Lindström
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorLeena Suominen
Department of Food and Environmental Sciences, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Nucleic acid-based community fingerprinting methods are valuable tools in microbial ecology, as they offer rapid and robust means to compare large series of replicates and references. To avoid the time-consuming and potentially subjective procedures of peak-based examination, we assessed the possibility to apply direct curve-based data analysis on community fingerprints produced with bacterial length heterogeneity PCR (LH-PCR). The dataset comprised 180 profiles from a 21-week rhizoremediation greenhouse experiment with three treatments and 10 sampling times. Curve-based analysis quantified the progressive effect of the plant (Galega orientalis) and the reversible effect of the contaminant (fuel oil) on bacterial succession. The major observed community shifts were assigned to changes in plant biomass and contamination level by canonical correlation analysis. A novel method to extract relative abundance data from the fingerprint curves for Shannon diversity index revealed contamination to reversibly decrease community complexity. By cloning and sequencing the fragment lengths, recognized to change in time in the averaged LH-PCR profiles, we identified Aquabacterium (Betaproteobacteria) as the putative r-strategic fuel oil degrader, and K-strategic Alphaproteobacteria growing in abundance later in succession. Curve-based community fingerprint analysis can be used for rapid data prescreening or as a robust alternative for the more heavily parameterized peak-based analysis.
Supporting Information
Filename | Description |
---|---|
fem1187-sup-0001-FigureS1.docWord document, 91.5 KB | Fig. S1. The specific effects of vegetation and contamination on bacterial community succession during rhizoremediation process. |
fem1187-sup-0002-FigureS2.docxWord document, 386.3 KB | Fig. S2. Three-dimensional peak-based multidimensional scaling (MDS) ordination (area-sensitive Jaccard similarity) for the 180 LH-PCR profiles of Contaminated Vegetated treatment (green), Contaminated reference (blue) and Vegetated reference (yellow) from sampling weeks 0–21 (Arabic number next to the symbol). |
fem1187-sup-0003-FigureS3.docxWord document, 44.3 KB | Fig. S3. Changes in the bacterial community complexity in Contaminated Vegetated treatment and Vegetated and Contaminated references. |
Please note: The publisher is not responsible for the content or functionality of any supporting information supplied by the authors. Any queries (other than missing content) should be directed to the corresponding author for the article.
References
- Abdo Z, Schüette UME, Bent SJ, Williams CJ, Forney LJ & Joyce P (2006) Statistical methods for characterizing diversity of microbial communities by analysis of terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of 16S rRNA genes. Environ Microbiol 8: 929–938.
- Alfreider A & Vogt C (2007) Bacterial diversity and aerobic biodegradation potential in a BTEX-contaminated aquifer. Water Air Soil Pollut 183: 415–426.
- Anderson MJ (2004) CAP: a FORTRAN Computer Program for Canonical Analysis of Principal Coordinates. Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, New Zealand. Available at: http://www.stat.auckland.ac.nz/~mja/Programs.htm, accessed 9 February 2010.
- Anderson MJ & Robinson J (2003) Generalised discriminant analysis based on distances. Aust N Z J Stat 45: 301–318.
- Anderson MJ & Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84: 511–525.
- Blackwood CB, Marsh T, Kim SH & Paul EA (2003) Terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism data analysis for quantitative comparison of microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 926–932.
- Blackwood CB, Hudleston D, Zak DR & Buyer JS (2007) Interpreting ecological diversity indices applied to terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism data: insights from simulated microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 73: 5276–5283.
- Brad T, Van Breukelen BM, Braster M, Van Straalen NM & Röling WF (2008) Spatial heterogeneity in sediment-associated bacterial and eukaryotic communities in a landfill leachate-contaminated aquifer. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 65: 534–543.
- Culman SW, Gauch HG, Blackwood CB & Thies JE (2008) Analysis of T-RFLP data using analysis of variance and ordination methods: a comparative study. J Microbiol Methods 75: 55–63.
- Egert M & Friedrich MW (2003) Formation of pseudo-terminal restriction fragments, a PCR-related bias affecting terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of microbial community structure. Appl Environ Microbiol 69: 2555–2562.
- Fierer N & Jackson RB (2006) The diversity and biogeography of soil bacterial communities. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103: 626–631.
- Fierer N, Bradford MA & Jackson RB (2007) Toward an ecological classification of soil bacteria. Ecology 88: 1354–1364.
- Fulthorpe R, Roesch LFW, Riva A & Tripplet EW (2008) Distantly sampled soils carry few species in common. ISME J 2: 901–910.
- Grant A & Ogilvie LA (2004) Name that microbe: rapid identification of taxa responsible for individual fragments in fingerprints of microbial community structure. Mol Ecol Notes 4: 133–136.
- Hartmann M & Widmer F (2006) Community structure analyses are more sensitive to differences in soil bacterial communities than anonymous diversity indices. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 7804–7812.
- Hartmann M & Widmer F (2008) Reliability of detecting composition and changes of microbial communities by T-RFLP genetic profiling. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63: 248–260.
- Hill TCJ, Walsh KA, Harris JA & Moffett BF (2003) Using ecological diversity measures with bacterial communities. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 43: 1–11.
- Janssen PH (2006) Identifying the dominant soil bacterial taxa in libraries of 16S rRNA and 16S rRNA genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 1719–1728.
- Joossens M, Huys G, Van Steen K, Cnockaert M, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P, Verbeke K, Vandamme P & De Preter V (2011) High-throughput method for comparative analysis of denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles from human fecal samples reveals significant increases in two bifidobacterial species after inulin-type prebiotic intake. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 75: 343–349.
- Kalmbach S, Manz W, Wecke J & Szewzyk U (1999) Aquabacterium gen. nov., with description of Aquabacterium citratiphilum sp. nov., Aquabacterium parvum sp. nov. and Aquabacterium commune sp. nov., three in situ dominant bacterial species from the Berlin drinking water system. Int J Syst Bacteriol 49: 769–777.
- Kaplan CW & Kitts CL (2003) Variation between observed and true terminal restriction fragment length is dependent on true TRF length and purine content. J Microbiol Methods 54: 121–125.
- Kefford BJ, Zalizniak L, Warne MSJ & Nugegoda D (2008) Is the integration of hormesis and essentiality into ecotoxicology now opening Pandora's Box? Environ Pollut 151: 516–523.
- Kennedy N, Brodie E, Connolly J & Clipson N (2004) Impact of lime, nitrogen and plant species on bacterial community structure in grassland microcosms. Environ Microbiol 6: 1070–1080.
- Kent AD & Triplett EW (2002) Microbial communities and their interactions in soil and rhizosphere ecosystems. Annu Rev Microbiol 56: 211–236.
- Kirk JL, Beaudette LA, Hart M, Moutoglis P, Klironomos JN, Lee H & Trevors JT (2004) Methods of studying soil microbial diversity. J Microbiol Methods 58: 169–188.
- Kropf S, Heuer H, Gruning M & Smalla K (2004) Significance test for comparing complex microbial community fingerprints using pairwise similarity measures. J Microbiol Methods 57: 187–195.
- Liu W-T, Marsh TL, Cheng H & Forney LJ (1997) Characterization of microbial diversity by determining terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms of genes encoding 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 63: 4516–4522.
- Magurran AE (2004) Measuring Biological Diversity. Blackwell Publishing, Oxford, UK.
- Margesin R, Hämmerle M & Tscherko D (2007) Microbial activity and community composition during bioremediation of diesel-oil-contaminated soil: effects of hydrocarbon concentration, fertilizers, and incubation time. Microb Ecol 53: 259–269.
- Mikkonen A, Kondo E, Lappi K, Wallenius K, Lindström K, Hartikainen H & Suominen L (2011) Contaminant and plant-derived changes in soil chemical and microbiological indicators during fuel oil rhizoremediation with Galega orientalis. Geoderma 160: 336–346.
- Militon C, Boucher D, Vachelard C, Perchet G, Barra V, Troquet J, Peyretaillade E & Peyret P (2010) Bacterial community changes during bioremediation of aliphatic hydrocarbon-contaminated soil. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 74: 669–681.
- Mills DEK, Fitzgerald K, Litchfield CD & Gillevet PM (2003) A comparison of DNA profiling techniques for monitoring nutrient impact on microbial community composition during bioremediation of petroleum-contaminated soils. J Microbiol Methods 54: 57–74.
- Muyzer G, de Wall E & Uitterlinden A (1993) Profiling of complex microbial populations by DGGE of PCR-amplified genes coding for 16S rRNA. Appl Environ Microbiol 59: 695–700.
- Oros-Sichler M, Costa R, Heuer H & Smalla K (2007) Molecular fingerprinting techniques to analyze soil microbial communities. Modern Soil Microbiology ( JD van Elsas, JK Jansson & JT Trevors, eds), pp. 355–386. CRC Press, Oxon, UK.
- Osborn AM, Moore ERB & Timmis KN (2000) An evaluation of terminal-restriction fragment length polymorphism (T-RFLP) analysis for the study of microbial community structure and dynamics. Environ Microbiol 2: 39–50.
- Osborne CA, Rees GN, Bernstein Y & Janssen PH (2006) New threshold and confidence estimates for terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis of complex bacterial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 72: 1270–1278.
- Parales RE (2010) Hydrocarbon degradation by Betaproteobacteria. Handbook of Hydrocarbon and Lipid Microbiology ( KN Timmis, ed.), pp. 1715–1724. Springer, Berlin, Germany.
10.1007/978-3-540-77587-4_121 Google Scholar
- Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs BM, Ludwig W, Peplies J & Glöckner FO (2007) SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35: 7188–7196.
- Ramette A (2007) Multivariate analyses in microbial ecology. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 62: 142–160.
- Ramette A (2009) Quantitative community fingerprinting methods for estimating the abundance of operational taxonomic units in natural microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 75: 2495–2505.
- Ranjard L, Lejon DPH, Mougel C, Schehrer L, Merdinoglu D & Chaussod R (2003) Sampling strategy in molecular microbial ecology: influence of soil sample size on DNA fingerprinting analysis of fungal and bacterial communities. Environ Microbiol 5: 1111–1120.
- Rettedal EA, Clay S & Brözel VS (2010) GC-Clamp primer batches yield 16S rRNA amplicon pools with variable GC clamps, affecting denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis profiles. FEMS Microbiol Lett 312: 55–62.
- Schloss PD (2009) A high-throughput DNA sequence aligner for microbial ecology studies. PLoS ONE 4: e8230.
- Shrestha PM, Noll M & Liesack W (2007) Phylogenetic identity, growth-response time and rRNA operon copy number of soil bacteria indicate different stages of community succession. Environ Microbiol 9: 2464–2474.
- Smalla K, Oros-Sichler M, Milling A, Heuer H, Baumgarte S, Becker R, Neuberd G, Kropf S, Ulrich A & Tebbe CC (2007) Bacterial diversity of soils assessed by DGGE, T-RFLP and SSCP fingerprints of PCR-amplified 16S rRNA gene fragments: Do the different methods provide similar results? J Microbiol Methods 69: 470–479.
- Suominen L, Jussila MM, Mäkeläinen K, Romantschuk M & Lindström K (2000) Evaluation of the Galega–Rhizobium galegae system for the bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil. Environ Pollut 107: 239–244.
- Sutton JT, Robertson BC & Jamieson IG (2011) Dye shift: a neglected source of genotyping error in molecular ecology. Mol Ecol Resour 11: 514–520.
- Suzuki M, Rappe MS & Giovannoni SJ (1998) Kinetic bias in estimates of coastal picoplankton community structure obtained by measurements of small-subunit rRNA gene PCR amplicon length heterogeneity. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 4522–4529.
- Thies JE (2007) Soil microbial community analysis using terminal restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Soil Sci Soc Am J 71: 579–591.
- Tiirola MA, Suvilampi JE, Kulomaa MS & Rintala JA (2003) Microbial diversity in a thermophilic aerobic biofilm process: analysis by length heterogeneity PCR (LH-PCR). Water Res 37: 2259–2268.
- Wallenius K, Rita H, Simpanen S, Mikkonen A & Niemi RM (2010) Sample storage for soil enzyme activity and bacterial community profiles. J Microbiol Methods 81: 48–55.
- Wallenius K, Rita H, Mikkonen A, Lappi K, Lindström K, Hartikainen K, Raateland A & Niemi RM (2011) Effects of land use on the level, variation and spatial structure of soil enzyme activities and bacterial communities. Soil Biol Biochem 43: 1464–1473.
- Yilmaz P, Kottmann R, Field D et al. (2011) Minimum information about a marker gene sequence (MIMARKS) and minimum information about any (x) sequence (MIxS) specifications. Nat Biotechnol 29: 415–420.
- Yu C-P & Chu K-H (2005) A quantitative assay for linking microbial community function and structure of a naphthalene-degrading microbial consortium. Environ Sci Technol 39: 9611–9619.