SYMPATRIC SPECIATION VIA HABITAT SPECIALIZATION DRIVEN BY DELETERIOUS MUTATIONS
Tadeusz J. Kawecki
Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742
Search for more papers by this authorTadeusz J. Kawecki
Department of Zoology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland, 20742
Search for more papers by this authorAbstract
Theoretical studies have suggested that the evolution of habitat (host) races, regarded as a prelude to sympatric speciation, requires strong trade-offs in adaptation to different habitats: alleles that improve fitness in some habitats and have deleterious effects of similar magnitude in other habitats must be segregating in the population. I argue that such trade-offs are not necessary; the evolution of habitat races can also be driven by genetic variation due to loci that affect fitness in one habitat and are neutral or nearly so in others, that is, when performance in different habitats is genetically independent. One source of such genetic variation are deleterious mutations with habitat-specific fitness effects. I use deterministic two-locus and multilocus models to show that the presence of such mutations in the gene pool results in indirect selection favoring habitat fidelity or habitat preference over acceptance of both suitable habitats. This leads to the evolution of largely genetically isolated populations that use different habitats, from a single panmictic population of individuals accepting both habitats. This study suggests that the conditions favoring habitat race formation, and thus possibly sympatric speciation, are much less stringent than previously thought.
Literature Cited
- Bell, G. 1992. The ecology and genetics of fitness in Chlamydomonas. V. The relationship between genetic correlation and environmental variance. Evolution 46: 561–566.
- Bernays, E., and M. Graham. 1988. On the evolution of host specificity in phytophagous arthropods. Ecology 69: 886–892.
- Bush, G. L. 1969. Sympatric host race formation and speciation in frugivorous flies of the genus Rhagoletis (Diptera, Tephritidae). Evolution 23: 237–251.
- Butlin, R. 1987. A new approach to sympatric speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2: 310–311.
- Christiansen, F. B. 1975. Hard and soft selection in a subdivided population. Am. Nat. 109: 11–16.
- Crow, J. F., and M. Kimura. 1970. An introduction to population genetics theory. Harper and Row, New York.
10.1006/tpbi.1995.1025 Google Scholar
- Crow, J. F., and M. J. Simmons. 1983. The mutation load in Drosophila. Pp. 1–35 in M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson, and J. N. Thompson, eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Academic Press, London.
- de Jong, G., and W. Scharloo. 1976. Environmental determination of selective significance or neutrality of amylase variants in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 84: 77–94.
- Dickinson, H., and J. Antonovics. 1973. Theoretical considerations of sympatric divergence. Am. Nat. 107: 256–274.
- Diehl, S. R., and G. L. Bush. 1989. The role of habitat preference in adaptation and speciation. Pp. 345–365 in D. Otte and J. E. Endler, ed. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
- Duffy, J. E. 1996. Resource-associated population subdivision in a symbiotic coral-reef shrimp. Evolution 50: 360–373.
- Ehrlich, P. R., and P. H. Raven. 1964. Butterflies and plants: a study in coevolution. Evolution 18: 586–608.
- Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35: 124–138.
- Fry, J. D. 1992. On the maintenance of genetic variation by disruptive selection among hosts in a phytophagous mite. Evolution 46: 279–283.
- Fry, J. D. 1996. The evolution of host specialization: are “tradeoffs” overrated? Am. Nat. 148: S84–S107.
- Fry, J. D., S. L. Heinsohn, and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. The contribution of new mutations to genotype-environment interaction for fitness in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 50: 2316–2327.
- Futuyma, D. J., and G. C. Mayer. 1980. Non-allopatric speciation in animals. Syst. Zool. 29: 254–271.
- Futuyma, D. J., and G. Moreno. 1988. The evolution of ecological specialization. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19: 207–233.
- Hartl, D. L., and A. G. Clark. 1989. Principles of population genetics. 2d ed. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
- Holt, R. D. 1996. Demographic constraints in evolution: towards unifying the evolutionary theories of senescence and niche conservatism. Evol. Ecol. 10: 1–11.
- Jaenike, J. 1990. Host specialization in phytophagous insects. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 21: 243–273.
- Johannesson, K., E. Rolán-Alvarez, and A. Ekendahl. 1995. Incipient reproductive isolation between two sympatric morphs of the intertidal snail Littorina saxatilis. Evolution 49: 1180–1190.
- Johnson, P. A., F. C. Hoppensteadt, J. J. Smith, and G. L. Bush. 1996. Conditions for sympatric speciation: a diploid model incorporating habitat fidelity and non-habitat assortative mating. Evol. Ecol. 10: 187–205.
- Kawecki, T. J. 1996. Sympatric speciation driven by beneficial mutations. Proc. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 263: 1515–1520.
- Kawecki, T. J., N. H. Barton, and J. D. Fry. 1997. Mutational collapse of fitness in marginal habitats and the evolution of ecological specialisation. J. Evol. Biol. 10: 407–429.
- Keightley, P. D. 1994. The distribution of mutation effects on viability in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 138: 1315–1322.
- Kondrashov, A. S. 1995. Contamination of the genome by very slightly deleterious mutations: why have we not died 100 times over? J. Theor. Biol. 175: 583–594.
- Kondrashov, A. S., and M. V. Mina. 1986. Sympatric speciation: when is it possible? Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 27: 201–223.
- Levene, H. 1953. Genetic equilibrium when more than one ecological niche is available. Am. Nat. 87: 331–333.
- Levins, R. 1968. Evolution in changing environments. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
10.1515/9780691209418 Google Scholar
- Lynch, M., and W. Gabriel. 1987. Environmental tolerance. Am. Nat. 129: 283–303.
- Mackenzie, A. 1996. A trade-off for host plant utilization in the black bean aphid, Aphis fabae. Evolution 50: 155–162.
- Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100: 637–650.
- Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
10.1111/j.0022-1112.2004.00433.x Google Scholar
- McCarthy, A. M. 1990. Speciation of echinostomes: evidence for the existence of two sympatric sibling species in the complex Echinoparyphium recurvatum (von Linstow 1873) (Digenea: Echinostomatidae). Parasitology 101: 35–42.
- Mukai, T. 1964. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. I. Spontaneous mutation rates of polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 50: 1–19.
- Mukai, T. 1969. The genetic structure of natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. VII. Synergistic interaction of spontaneous mutant polygenes controlling viability. Genetics 61: 749–761.
- Pimm, S. T. 1979. Sympatric speciation: a simulation model. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 11: 131–139.
- Prout, T. 1968. Sufficient conditions for multiple niche polymorphism. Am. Nat. 102: 493–496.
- Rausher, M. D. 1984. The evolution of habitat selection in subdivided populations. Evolution 38: 596–608.
- Rice, W. R. 1987. Speciation via habitat specialization: the evolution of reproductive isolation as a correlated character. Evol. Ecol. 1: 301–315.
- Rice, W. R., and E. E. Hostert. 1993. Laboratory experiments on speciation: what have we learned in 40 years? Evolution 47: 1637–1653.
- Rosenzweig, M. L. 1978. Competitive speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 10: 275–289.
- Strong, D. R., J. H. Lawton, and T. R. E. Southwood. 1984. Insects of plants. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
- Szathmary, E. 1993. Do deleterious mutations act synergistically—metabolic control theory provides a partial answer. Genetics 133: 127–132.
- Tauber, C. A., and M. J. Tauber. 1989. Sympatric speciation in insects: perception and perspective. Pp. 307–344 in D. Otte and J. E. Endler, ed. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
- Théron, A., and C. Combes. 1995. Asynchrony of infection timing, habitat preference, and sympatric speciation of schistosome parasites. Evolution 49: 372–375.
- Thompson, J. N. 1994. The coevolutionary process. Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago.
10.1046/j.1420-9101.2001.00348.x Google Scholar
- Udovic, D. 1980. Frequency-dependent selection, disruptive selection, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Am. Nat. 116: 621–641.
- Van Tienderen, P. H. 1991. Evolution of generalists and specialists in spatially heterogeneous environments. Evolution 45: 1317–1331.
- Via, S. 1990. Ecological genetics and host adaptation in herbivorous insects: the experimental study of evolution in natural and agricultural systems. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35: 421–446.
- Via, S. 1991. The genetic structure of host plant adaptation in a spatial patchwork: demographic variability among reciprocally transplanted pea aphid clones. Evolution 45: 827–852.
- Whitlock, M. C. 1996. The Red Queen beats the jack-of-all-trades: the limitations on the evolution of phenotypic plasticity and niche breadth. Am. Nat. 148: S65–S77.