Volume 45, Issue 7 pp. 1585-1605
Article
Free Access

PEMPHIGUS REVISITED: CHANGES IN GEOGRAPHIC VARIATION BUT CONSTANCY IN VARIABILITY AND COVARIATION

Robert R. Sokal

Robert R. Sokal

Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-5245 USA

Search for more papers by this author
Robert S. Unnasch

Robert S. Unnasch

Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-5245 USA

Present address: The Nature Conservancy, 1815 North Lynn Street, Arlington, VA 22209 USA.Search for more papers by this author
Barbara A. Thomson

Barbara A. Thomson

Department of Ecology and Evolution, State University of New York at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-5245 USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: November 1991
Citations: 29
This paper is part 15 of a study of variation in the aphid genus Pemphigus. References to parts 1–10 are given in Sokal et al. (1980). Parts 11, 12, 13, and 14 are, respectively, Bird et al. (1981), Sokal and Riska (1981), Bingham and Sokal (1986), and Sokal and Unnasch (1988).

Abstract

Samples of the gall-forming aphids Pemphigus populicaulis and P. populitransversus (both elongate and globular morphs) were re-collected at sites in eastern North America after 13 to 16 years. Twenty-three morphometric characters of the galls, stem mothers, and alate fundatrigeniae were analyzed by univariate and multivariate methods. Varying proportions of the variance of each character are attributable to the four levels of variation—locality, year, year by locality interaction, and among galls (within one year and locality). The year by locality interaction level generally has the greatest variation and is highly significant. Year and locality effects tend to be lower and not significant. The variance components do not exhibit trends with time. Geographic variation patterns of single variables or factor scores in the original and revisited populations show significant spatial structure overall but lack clear-cut spatial patterns, especially clines. Observable patterns of variation match results of the spatial analyses: most characters lack clear trends; patterns in the revisited data do not resemble patterns for the same variables in the original data. Variability profiles for characters change little over the time span and are comparable among and within localities. Covariation among characters over localities is largely maintained during the time interval despite the changes in patterns. Fluctuating interclonal competition among aphids on secondary hosts is believed to cause the marked heterogeneity in space and time among the aphids in the galls.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.