Volume 57, Issue 4 pp. 939-945
PAPER
GENERAL

An Investigation into the Differentiating Characteristics Between Car Key Burglars and Regular Burglars

Rachel Chapman M.Sc.

Rachel Chapman M.Sc.

Forensic Section, School of Psychology, University of Leicester, 106 New Walk, Leicester LE1 7EA, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
Lisa L. Smith M.Sc.

Lisa L. Smith M.Sc.

Forensic Section, School of Psychology, University of Leicester, 106 New Walk, Leicester LE1 7EA, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
John W. Bond D.Phil.

John W. Bond D.Phil.

Scientific Support Department, Northamptonshire Police, Wootton Hall, Northampton NN4 0JQ, U.K.

Department of Chemistry, University of Leicester, University Road, Leicester LE1 7RH, U.K.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 15 February 2012
Citations: 4
Additional information and reprint requests:
Dr. John W. Bond, OBE D.Phil.
George Porter Building
Department of Chemistry
University of Leicester
University Road
Leicester LE1 7RH
U.K.
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Abstract: Car key burglary has recently become the focus of empirical investigation as offenders, no longer able to steal vehicles without first obtaining their keys, resort to “burgling” target properties. Research surrounding the modus operandi of these offenses is beginning to emerge; however, little attention has been paid to investigating the characteristics of car key burglary offenders. Challenging the assumption that car key burglary offenses are perpetrated by regular burglars, this study aims to differentiate between offenders. Logistic regression analysis of 110 car key and 110 regular burglary offenders revealed that car key burglars are more likely to have previous vehicle theft convictions and are also more likely to be detected on information supplied to the police than regular burglars. Regular burglars are more likely to have previous shoplifting convictions. It was concluded that car key burglars are a distinct sample of offenders and the implications of these findings are discussed.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.