Volume 56, Issue 1 pp. 165-169

Sex Determination Using the Second Cervical Vertebra—A Test of the Method*

Emily J. Marlow M.Sc.

Emily J. Marlow M.Sc.

Department of Archaeological, Geographical and Environmental Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP.

Search for more papers by this author
Robert F. Pastor Ph.D.

Robert F. Pastor Ph.D.

Department of Archaeological, Geographical and Environmental Sciences, School of Life Sciences, University of Bradford, Richmond Road, Bradford, West Yorkshire, BD7 1DP.

Department of Anthropology, 308 Condon Hall, 1218 University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403-1218.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 23 August 2010
Citations: 52
Additional information and reprint requests:
Emily J. Marlow, M.Sc.
The University of Manchester
Faculty of Life Sciences
Stopford Building
Oxford Road
Manchester
M13 9PT
U.K.
E-mail: [email protected]

Presented as a poster at the 76th American Association of Physical Anthropology Conference, March 28–31, 2007, in Philadelphia, PA.

Abstract

Abstract: Sex is one of the critical questions addressed when unidentified skeletal remains are discovered in forensic or archeological contexts. Continuous testing and re-evaluation of existing techniques is essential to improve accuracy and precision. The Wescott (J Forensic Sci 2000;45(2):462–6) method of sex determination from dimensions of the second cervical vertebra was blind-tested on 153 adult individuals from the Spitalfields documented collection of human skeletal remains held at the Natural History Museum, London. Significant sex differences were determined for all dimensions measured (independent two-sample t-test, p < 0.05–0.001). The discriminant functions developed by Wescott were shown to have an overall accuracy of classification of 76.99%. Using stepwise discriminant analysis, a discriminant function based on the Spitalfields data correctly classified sex in 83.3% of individuals and was able to classify males and females with equal accuracy. Additional discriminant functions are presented for use in instances where preservation of the second cervical vertebra is poor.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.