Volume 55, Issue 2 pp. 482-487

The Utility of the Samworth and Gowland Age-at-Death “Look-up” Tables in Forensic Anthropology*

Nicholas V. Passalacqua M.S.

Nicholas V. Passalacqua M.S.

Department of Anthropology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48824.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 March 2010
Citations: 12
Additional information and reprint requests:
Nicholas V. Passalacqua, M.S.
Michigan State University
Anthropology Department
354 Baker Hall
East Lansing, MI 48824
E-mail: [email protected]
*

Presented in part at the 60th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, February 18–23, 2008, in Washington, DC.

Abstract

Abstract: Accurate age-at-death estimates are crucial to forensic anthropologists when onstructing biological profiles aimed at narrowing a missing-persons list and to allow for timely and efficient identification of an unknown victim. The present contribution evaluates the utility of three new age-at-death estimation techniques recently proposed by Samworth and Gowland (2007). Results indicate that, in the samples under study, the Samworth and Gowland estimates from the pubic symphysis and auricular surface perform similar to alternate phase methods. The combined method does not appear to further enhance either the precision or the accuracy of the single pubic symphysis age-at-death estimate. In conclusion, these new methods seem to be more robust to distribution deviations than originally proposed by Samworth and Gowland (2007). They are therefore suitable for immediate and reliable forensic usage in the United States and worthy of further research for their use in North American forensic contexts.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.