Volume 53, Issue 2 pp. 263-268

Healing Following Cranial Trauma*

Lenore T. Barbian Ph.D.

Lenore T. Barbian Ph.D.

Department of History and Anthropology, 141 Hendricks Hall, 235 Scotland Rd, Edinboro University of Pennsylvania, Edinboro, PA 16444.

Search for more papers by this author
Paul S. Sledzik M.S.

Paul S. Sledzik M.S.

National Transportation Safety Board, Office of Transportation Disaster Assistance, 490 L’Enfant Plaza, SW, Washington, DC 20594.

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 19 February 2008
Citations: 66
Additional information and reprint requests:
Lenore Barbian, Ph.D.
Department of History and Anthropology
141 Hendricks Hall, 235 Scotland Rd
Edinboro University of Pennsylvania
Edinboro, PA 16444
E-mail: [email protected]
*

Presented at the 56th Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences, in Dallas, TX, February 16–21, 2004.

Abstract

Abstract: This paper reports on the gross appearance of the initial osseous response following cranial gunshot wounds. A total of 127 adult crania and cranial sections were analyzed for four types of bone response: osteoblastic, osteoclastic, line of demarcation, and sequestration. In general, no osteoblastic or osteoclastic response was noted during the first week. This response was followed by an increasing prevalence of expression after this time. By the sixth week postfracture both osteoclastic and osteoblastic activity was scored for 100% of the sample. Further, our observations suggest that the line of demarcation may establish the boundary between the living bone and bone not surviving the fracture. Sequestration appears to be a long-term event and was scored as present well past the eighth week of healing. The osseous expression of infection following fracture was also considered.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.