Volume 3, Issue 9 pp. 827-831
Free Access

Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Diagnosis: Lumbar Puncture Is Still Needed When the Computed Tomography Scan Is Normal

Robert Sidman MD

Corresponding Author

Robert Sidman MD

Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, Department of Emergency Medicine (RS, EC, TL)

Department of Emergency Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Samuels Building, 2nd Floor, 593 Eddy Street, Providence, RI 02903. Fax: 401–444–6662; e-mail: [email protected]Search for more papers by this author
Emily Connolly RN,

Emily Connolly RN,

Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, Department of Emergency Medicine (RS, EC, TL)

Search for more papers by this author
Thomas Lemke MD

Thomas Lemke MD

Brown University School of Medicine, Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, Department of Emergency Medicine (RS, EC, TL)

Search for more papers by this author
First published: September 1996
Citations: 112

ABSTRACT

Objectives: To determine the sensitivity of third-generation CT scanners for diagnosed nontraumatic subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and to assess the impact of symptom duration on sensitivity.

Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed in a university-affiliated tertiary care hospital with an annual ED volume of >100,000 patients. The target population was all patients who presented to the ED from January 1991 to September 1994 with symptoms suggestive of SAH and who had a final diagnosis of nontraumatic SAH based on either a positive CT scan or positive spinal fluid analysis. Patients referred from outside facilities were included if they had a CT done at the study site. All CT scans were done using third-generation scanners. Official CT scan reports were used to categorize scans as positive or negative.

Results: There were 140 patients identified with SAH, with a mean age of 56 years (range 10–88). The sensitivity of CT in the diagnosis of nontraumatic SAH when performed at or before 12 hours of symptom duration was 100% (80/80), and 81.7% (49/60) after 12 hours of symptom duration (95% CI 95–100% and 69.5–90.4%, respectively; p < 0.0001). Eleven of the 140 patients had a negative CT and positive spinal fluid analysis, yielding an overall sensitivity of 92.1% (129/140).

Conclusion: The sensitivity of third-generation CT scans for SAH decreases with time from the onset of symptoms. In this sample population, CT was able to detect all patients scanned ^12 hours after symptom onset. Although the study demonstrated good sensitivity of CT scan reports for SAH when the scan was performed after S12 hours of symptom onset, additional real-time experience is needed to better define the potential risk of a missed SAH should this population not receive the customary lumbar puncture examination in the setting of a negative CT scan.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.