Volume 6, Issue 1 pp. 51-58
Full Access

Resistance of Calves to Reinfection with Eimeria bovis

CLYDE M. SENGER

CLYDE M. SENGER

Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University and the Animal Disease and Parasite Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Logan, Utah

Public Health Service Research Fellow of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, Utah State University, Logan, Utah. Department of Zoology, Montana State University, Missoula, Montana.

Search for more papers by this author
DATUS M. HAMMOND

DATUS M. HAMMOND

Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University and the Animal Disease and Parasite Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Logan, Utah

Search for more papers by this author
JOSEPH L. THORNE

JOSEPH L. THORNE

Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University and the Animal Disease and Parasite Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Logan, Utah

Search for more papers by this author
A. EARL JOHNSON

A. EARL JOHNSON

Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University and the Animal Disease and Parasite Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Logan, Utah

Search for more papers by this author
G. MARK WELLS

G. MARK WELLS

Agricultural Experiment Station, Utah State University and the Animal Disease and Parasite Research Division, Agricultural Research Service, U. S. Department of Agriculture, Logan, Utah

Search for more papers by this author
First published: February 1959
Citations: 24

Abstract

SYNOPSIS. An immunity to reinfection with E. bovis was demonstrated in 3 experiments involving 60 calves. This immunity develops rapidly, as indicated by resistance to a challenge given 14 days after the immunizing inoculation. In 3 groups of 3 to 6 young calves each, immunity was still present to a moderate degree 2 to 3 months after inoculation; in one group of 5 animals about a year old there was apparently a high degree of immunity about 7 months after the last inoculation. In one experiment an immunizing inoculum of 10,000 oöcysts did not produce as much immunity as 50,000 oöcysts. In 2 experiments there appeared to be little difference in the immunity produced by a single inoculation of 50,000 as compared with 100,000 oöcysts, but inoculation with 100,000 oöcysts, resulted in substantially longer and more severe illness than 50,000 oöcysts. There appeared to be no appreciable difference in clinical symptoms or development of immunity between calves given a single immunizing inoculum and those given the same number of oöcysts in 5 equal inocula on successive days. Treatment with sulfamethazine and sulfamerazine (Merameth) 13 to 15 days after inoculation alleviated the clinical symptoms of coccidiosis without interfering appreciably with the development of immunity. In one experiment with 7 calves, no beneficial effect was noted from 1 or 2 transfusions of 500 ml. of plasma and leucocytes from immune calves into 4 calves 1 and 12 days or 11 days after a challenge inoculation.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.