Volume 22, Issue 6 pp. 496-502
Free to Read

The Amplatzer Duct Occluder II: A New Device for Percutaneous Ductus Arteriosus Closure

ZAKHIA SALIBA M.D.

ZAKHIA SALIBA M.D.

Saint Joseph University, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Pediatric Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery, Beirut, Lebanon

Search for more papers by this author
ISSAM EL-RASSI M.D.

ISSAM EL-RASSI M.D.

Saint Joseph University, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Pediatric Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery, Beirut, Lebanon

Search for more papers by this author
MARIE-THÉRÈSE ABI-WARDE M.D.

MARIE-THÉRÈSE ABI-WARDE M.D.

Saint Joseph University, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Pediatric Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery, Beirut, Lebanon

Search for more papers by this author
GHASSAN CHEHAB M.D.

GHASSAN CHEHAB M.D.

Saint Joseph University, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Pediatric Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery, Beirut, Lebanon

Search for more papers by this author
LINDA DAOU M.D.

LINDA DAOU M.D.

Saint Joseph University, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Pediatric Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery, Beirut, Lebanon

Search for more papers by this author
DANIELE KHATER M.D.

DANIELE KHATER M.D.

Saint Joseph University, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Pediatric Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery, Beirut, Lebanon

Search for more papers by this author
BERNARD GERBAKA M.D.

BERNARD GERBAKA M.D.

Saint Joseph University, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Pediatric Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery, Beirut, Lebanon

Search for more papers by this author
VICTOR JEBARA M.D.

VICTOR JEBARA M.D.

Saint Joseph University, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Pediatric Cardiology & Cardiac Surgery, Beirut, Lebanon

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 01 December 2009
Citations: 19
Address for reprints: Issam El-Rassi, M.D., Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Hotel-Dieu de France Hospital, Beirut, Lebanon, PO Box 166830. Fax: +961-161-5300 extension 9706; e-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

Objective: Study the new Amplatzer Duct Occluder II (ADO II). Limitations were encountered with the preexisting devices in nonconical ducts, large ducts, or in small infants. These include failure, residual shunts, protrusion, migration, and vascular damage.

Methods: Between June 2008 and March 2009, 20 consecutive patients were enrolled. In cases where different devices were applicable, we favored the use of the ADO II to maximize our experience with this device and prove its superiority. No coils were required in these 20 patients.

Results: There were 15 females and 5 males (median age 2 years). ADO II group (n = 16): Immediate complete closure in 75% of the patients, rising to 93.7% at 24 hours. A residual shunt persisted at 3 months in one child. Aortic narrowing from device protrusion was noted in two type E ducts, without any significant gradient, however. ADO I group (n = 4): In two adolescents and in one adult patient, the duct was successfully closed. In a 2-year-old patient with a 6.6 mm type B duct, the ADO I totally obstructed the aortic flow and was retrieved before releasing. The child was sent for surgery.

Conclusion: Even though we did not compare the ADO II to other devices, we feel that it has the capacity to substitute most of the coils, and some of the original ADO I indications. Arterial access was sufficient in most patients, but venous delivery is advised in small infants with large or long ducts, to avoid aortic protrusion and residual shunts.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.