Volume 20, Issue 1 pp. 85-92

Membrane Time Constant During Internal Defibrillation Strength Shocks in Intact Heart: Effects of Na+ and Ca2+ Channel Blockers

KENT A. MOWREY M.S.

KENT A. MOWREY M.S.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
IGOR R. EFIMOV Ph.D.

IGOR R. EFIMOV Ph.D.

Department of Biomedical Engineering, Washington University, St. Louis, Missouri, USA

Search for more papers by this author
YUANNA CHENG M.D., Ph.D.

YUANNA CHENG M.D., Ph.D.

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, USA

Search for more papers by this author
First published: 29 December 2008
Citations: 8
Address for correspondence: Yuanna Cheng, M.D., Ph.D., Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, NE61, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. Fax: 216-445-4166; E-mail: [email protected]

This study was supported by American Heart Association grants 9960384 V and 0235172 N to Dr. Cheng, and NIH R01-HL67322 and R01-HL074283 to Dr. Efimov.

Manuscript received 25 April 2004; De novo manuscript received 8 June 2008; Accepted for publication 30 June 2008.

Abstract

Introduction: We assessed defibrillation strength shock-induced changes of the membrane time constant (τ) and membrane potential (ΔVm) in intact rabbit hearts after administration of lidocaine, a sodium (Na+) channel blocker, or nifedipine, a L-type calcium (Ca2+) channel blocker.

Methods and Results: We optically mapped anterior, epicardial, electrical activity during monophasic shocks (±100, ±130, ±160, ±190, and ±220 V; 150 μF; 8 ms) applied at 25%, 50%, and 75% of the action potential duration via a shock lead system in Langendorff-perfused hearts. The protocol was run twice for each heart under control and after lidocaine (15 μM, n = 6) or nifedipine (2μM, n = 6) addition. τ in the virtual electrode area away from the shock lead was approximated with single-exponential fits from a total of 121,125 recordings. The same data set was used to calculate ΔVm. We found (1) Under all conditions, there is inverse relationship between τ and ΔVm with respect to changes of shock strength, regardless of shock polarity and phase of application: a stronger shock resulted in a larger ΔVm, which corresponded to a smaller τ (faster cellular response); (2) Lidocaine did not cause appreciable changes in either τ or ΔVm versus control, and (3) Nifedipine significantly increased both τ and ΔVm in the virtual cathode area; in contrast, in the virtual anode area, this effect depended on the phase of shock application.

Conclusion: τ and ΔVm are inversely related. Na+ channel blocker has minimal impact on either τ or ΔVm. Ca2+ blocker caused polarity and phase-dependent significant changes in τ and ΔVm.

The full text of this article hosted at iucr.org is unavailable due to technical difficulties.